← All Phrases

“regular assessment”

Chapter I - PreliminarySection 2 - DefinitionsSection 2(40) / Section 143(3) / Section 1442,899 judgments

The decision most relied on for regular assessment is CIT v. Continental Warehousing Corporation (Nhava Sheva) Ltd. (374 ITR 645), cited in 1,823 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on regular assessment

CIT v. Continental Warehousing Corporation (Nhava Sheva) Ltd.
374 ITR 645 · 2015 · High Court
1,823
citing judgments

In Section 153A proceedings, the scope of assessment extends to abated proceedings, enabling an assessee to raise fresh legal claims that could have been made in regular assessment proceedings.

Lalchand Bhagat Ambica Ram v. CIT
37 ITR 288 · 1959 · Supreme Court
570
citing judgments

Where an assessee maintains regular books of account, and these books are not rejected or found defective by the Assessing Officer, any cash deposits or available cash shown in the cash book, if sufficient to cover the transaction, cannot be treated as unexplained income or an addition under sections 68 or 69A.

Canara Housing Development Co. v. DCIT
49 Taxmann.com 98 · 2014 · High Court
283
citing judgments

Proceedings under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act are not confined solely to incriminating material found during a search, and the Assessing Officer can assess total income for the relevant years.

DCIT v. Sunil Kumar Sharma
159 Taxmann.com 179 · 2024 · High Court
269
citing judgments

Loose sheets of paper containing jottings, not shown to be part of regularly maintained books of accounts, do not constitute incriminating material for initiating assessment under section 153C. The satisfaction note required for 153C proceedings must specify the assessment year to which the alleged incriminating material belongs.

CIT v. British Paints India Ltd.
188 ITR 44 · 1991 · Supreme Court
204
citing judgments

The Assessing Officer has a duty to examine whether an assessee's books of account truly disclose the correct income and is not bound to accept the accounting system regularly employed by the assessee or methods followed in earlier years. Each assessment year is a distinct and self-contained unit for tax purposes.

CIT v. Lavanya Land (P) Ltd.
83 Taxmann.com 161 · 2017 · High Court
172
citing judgments

In a search assessment under Section 153A or 153C, additions cannot be sustained if the material or transactions relied upon do not relate or pertain to the assessee. Regular books of accounts not unearthed during search do not constitute incriminating material to justify additions.

All Cargo Global Logistics Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax
23 Taxmann.com 103 · 2012 · High Court
162
citing judgments

Additions cannot be made under Section 153A for assessment years where original assessments have become final, unless incriminating material relevant to those years is unearthed during the search operation under Section 132.

CIT v. Gurubachhan Singh J. Juneja
302 ITR 63 · 2008 · High Court
147
citing judgments

When unaccounted receipts or suppressed sales are detected and books of account are rejected under Section 145(3), additions to income must be restricted to the profit element embedded in such transactions, not the entire transaction value. This profit element is to be estimated by considering the assessee's regular profit ratio as per books of account.

Judgments citing regular assessment

Balasinor Vikas Co. Op. Credit Society Ltd., Mahisagar vs. The Pr. CIT, Vadodara-1, Vadodara

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 908/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad01 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 908/Ahd/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18) बनाम/ Balasinor Vikas Co.Op. The Principal Credit Society Ltd. Commissioner Of Income Vs. Rajpuri Darwaja, Opp. Tax Masjit, Balasinor - Vadodara-1, Baroda - 388255, Gujarat 390007 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaaab4748H (Appellant) .. (Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant By : Shri Mehul K. Patel, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By Shri Sudhendu Das, Cit. Dr : Date Of Hearing 02/09/2024 01/10/2024 Date Of Pronouncement O R D E R Per Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha, Am: This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Principle Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pcit, Vadodara-1 (In Short ‘The Pcit’), Dated 22.03.2024 Passed Under Section 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short ‘The Act’) For The Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2017-18. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Had Filed His Return Of Income For A.Y. 2017-18 On 18.10.2017 Declaring Nil Income. The Original Assessment Was Completed U/S.143(3) Of The

For Appellant: Shri Mehul K. Patel, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

deduction, therefore no action u/s 147 can be taken on this issue. Further, the same issue was already examined during the course of regular assessment and reopening on mere change of opinion is not in consonance with the decisions of jurisdictional high court and the Apex Court which are cited