Anandakrishnan Badrinarayanan, Chennai vs. ITO, Corp Ward 4(1), Chennai
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn
ITA 2806/CHNY/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jan 2025AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं/.Ita No.: 2806/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 Shri Anandakrishnan The Income Tax Officer, Badrinarayanan, V. Corporate Ward 4(1), 13, 3Rd Floor, Rams Apartment, Chennai. 181, Ttk Road, Alwarpet, Chennai – 600 018. Pan: Aacpb 6471A (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri D. Anand, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. R. Anitha, Addl.Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 29.01.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 29.01.2025 आदेश/ O R D E R Per S. R. Raghunatha: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, Dated 18.03.2024 & Pertains To Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. At The Outset, We Find That There Is A Delay Of 171 Days In Appeal Filed By The Assessee, For Which Petition For Condonation Of Delay Along With Reasons For Delay Has Been Filed. After Considering
For Appellant: Shri D. Anand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. R. Anitha, Addl.CIT
assessee for adjudication.
3. At the time of hearing, the ld.AR for the assessee has stated that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas
Scheme, 2024 and has filed copy of Form 2 issued by the PCIT under the VSVS Scheme, 2024 and requested for withdrawal ... light of the above, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee with a liberty to reinstate the appeal if his application under Direct
Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, is not accepted.
4. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced