← All Phrases

“direct tax vivad se vishwas”

Settlement & AmnestyDTVSV 2020DTVSV 20202,154 judgments

Judgments citing direct tax vivad se vishwas

Harilal Lakhamshi Jewellers Private Limited, Gandhidham vs. AO, Gandhidham

In the result, the appeal of the assessee (in ITA No

ITA 25/RJT/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot03 Feb 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am. & Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.25/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (2014-15) (Hybrid Hearing) Harilal Lakhamshi Jewellers Private Vs. The Acit, Circle Gandhidham. Limited. Haribhai Soni Building, L.B. Shastri Road, Anjar, Kachchh. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadcm2942H (Respondent) Appellant By : Withdrawal Application By The Assessee Respondent By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 30 /01 /2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 03 /02 /2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm: Captioned Appeal Filed By Assessee Pertaining To Assessment Year 2014- 15, Is Directed Against Order Passed By Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal), Order Dated 03/10/2023, Which Intern Arises Out Of Order Passed By Assessing Officer Dated 31/01/2018 U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 144C(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. By Way Of Letter Dated 24/12/2024 Assessee Submitted That He Has Opted Benefit Of The “Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024”. Form No.02 Dated 16/12/2024 With Acknowledgement Number 755219021161224 Is Placed On Record & Requested For Withdrawal Of Appeal.

For Appellant: Withdrawal Application by the assesseeFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. By way of letter dated 24/12/2024 assessee submitted that he has opted benefit of the “Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024”. Form No.02 dated 16/12/2024 with acknowledgement number 755219021161224 is placed on record and requested for withdrawal of appeal. ITA-25/RJT/2024

Induben Narendra Patel, Junagadh vs. ACIT, Junagadh Circle, Junagadh

In the result, the appeal of the assessee (in ITA No

ITA 339/RJT/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot03 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am. & Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.339 & 340/Rjt/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (2016-17 & 2017-18) (Hybrid Hearing) Smt. Induben Narendra Patel, Vs. The Acit, Circle Junagadh. Junagadh. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Acjpp0001D (Respondent) Appellant By : Withdrawal Application By The Assessee Respondent By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 30 /01 /2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 03 /02 /2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm: Captioned Appeals Filed By Assessee Pertaining To Assessment Year 2016- 17 & 2017-18, Are Directed Against Order Passed By Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal), Orders Dated 31/07/203 , Which Intern Arises Out Of Order Passed By Assessing Officer Dated 29/12/2018 U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 & Order Dated 12/12/2019 U/S 143(3). 2. By Way Of Letters Dated 24/12/2024 Assessee Submitted That He Has Opted Benefit Of The “Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024” & Requested For Withdrawal Of Appeals.

For Appellant: Withdrawal Application by the assesseeFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

order dated 12/12/2019 u/s 143(3). 2. By way of letters dated 24/12/2024 assessee submitted that he has opted benefit of the “Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024” and requested for withdrawal of appeals. 3. On the other hand, the Ld. Sr. DR for the Revenue did not have

Vestas Wind Systems A/S, Chennai vs. ACIT, Intnl Tax Circle-2(2), Chennai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 292/CHNY/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Hon’Ble Shri Jagadishआयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.292/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2016-2017) Vestas Wind Systems A/S, Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of C/O. Vestas Wind Technology India Income Tax, Private Limited, International Tax Circe 2(2) 298, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Chennai. Old Mahabalipuram Road, Sholinganallur, Chennai 600 119. [Pan: Aadcv 3144Q] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri N.V. Balaji, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Ms. Ann Marry Baby, Cit.

For Appellant: Shri N.V. Balaji, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Ann Marry Baby, CIT

stated that the present appeal is intended to be withdrawn by the appellant, for the purpose of opting the benefit under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (DTVSV), 2024. Assessee also informed that Form No.1 DTVSV has been filed on 30.12.2024 and Form No.2 is issued ... Accordingly, noting the fact that the assessee is opted for resolution of dispute under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (DTVSV), 2024, we treat this appeal being dismissed as withdrawn. 4. The assessee is given liberty for restoration of the present appeal in case the resolution of dispute under Direct

Anandakrishnan Badrinarayanan, Chennai vs. ITO, Corp Ward 4(1), Chennai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn

ITA 2806/CHNY/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं/.Ita No.: 2806/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 Shri Anandakrishnan The Income Tax Officer, Badrinarayanan, V. Corporate Ward 4(1), 13, 3Rd Floor, Rams Apartment, Chennai. 181, Ttk Road, Alwarpet, Chennai – 600 018. Pan: Aacpb 6471A (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri D. Anand, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. R. Anitha, Addl.Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 29.01.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 29.01.2025 आदेश/ O R D E R Per S. R. Raghunatha: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, Dated 18.03.2024 & Pertains To Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. At The Outset, We Find That There Is A Delay Of 171 Days In Appeal Filed By The Assessee, For Which Petition For Condonation Of Delay Along With Reasons For Delay Has Been Filed. After Considering

For Appellant: Shri D. Anand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. R. Anitha, Addl.CIT

assessee for adjudication. 3. At the time of hearing, the ld.AR for the assessee has stated that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and has filed copy of Form 2 issued by the PCIT under the VSVS Scheme, 2024 and requested for withdrawal ... light of the above, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee with a liberty to reinstate the appeal if his application under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, is not accepted. 4. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced