ISRAR MOINUDDIN KHAN , THANE vs. ITO, THANE
Before: SHRI AMARJIT SINGH & SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARYAssessment Year 2013-14
PER AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The appeal of the assessee for the assessment year 2013-14
is directed against the order dated 18.09.2024 passed by the ld.
National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi.
2. At the time of hearing, the ld. AR for the assessee filed letter dated 27.01.2025 and submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024. Before us, the ld.
Counsel also submitted that Form No. 1 of Vivad Se Vishwas
Scheme, 2024 filed has also been received. In light of the above and after considering the submission that assessee had received
Form No. 1 under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee with the liberty to reinstate the appeal if its Israr Moinuddin Khan
A.Y. 2013-14
2
application under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 is not accepted.
3. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 30.01.2025. (RAHUL CHAUDHARY) (AMARJIT SINGH)
JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Mumbai, Dated: 30.01.2025
Biswajit, Sr. P.S.
Copy to:
The Appellant: 2. The Respondent: 3. The CIT, 4. The DR
////
[
By Order