← All Phrases

“registration under section 12A”

Charitable TrustsSection 12ASection 12A2,527 judgments

The decision most relied on for registration under section 12A is ACIT v. Surat City Gymkhana (300 ITR 214), cited in 125 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on registration under section 12A

ACIT v. Surat City Gymkhana
300 ITR 214 · 2008 · Supreme Court
125
citing judgments

Once an institution receives registration under Section 12AA, the Assessing Officer must compute its income as per Section 11, focusing only on the application of income and not re-examining the charitable nature of its activities. The Supreme Court also clarified the meaning and scope of 'general public utility' under Section 2(15).

Ananda Social and Educational Trust v. CIT
426 ITR 340 · 2020 · Supreme Court
116
citing judgments

For registration under Section 12AA, the Commissioner (Exemptions) must examine the objects of the trust and the genuineness of its proposed activities, even if the trust has not yet commenced actual charitable activities or incurred expenditure.

Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority v. ACIT
396 ITR 323 · 2017 · High Court
108
citing judgments

Development authorities can continue to be regarded as existing for a 'Charitable Purpose' under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, even after the introduction of the proviso to that section. The contention that such authorities automatically lose their charitable status due to the proviso is incorrect.

CIT v. Gujarat Maritime Board
295 ITR 561 · 2007 · Supreme Court
98
citing judgments

A statutory corporation undertaking activities that generate income qualifies as a charitable entity under Section 2(15) if its dominant object is general public utility and it is legally obligated to apply its income solely for that purpose, even if the activities appear to be in the nature of trade or business. Such an entity is entitled to registration under Section 12A and exemptions under Section 11.

CIT v. Dawoodi Bohra Jamat
364 ITR 31 · 2014 · Supreme Court
83
citing judgments

A trust's objects, even if based on religious tenets, can qualify as charitable for tax exemptions if its benefits are not exclusively restricted to a particular religious community or caste.

CIT v. Ahmedabad Rana Caste Association
140 ITR 1 · 1983 · Supreme Court
82
citing judgments

An object beneficial to a section of the public, as distinguished from an individual or group of individuals, qualifies as an object of general public utility under Section 2(15) and hence a charitable purpose. This applies even if the benefits are restricted to a specific caste, community, or professional group.

CIT v. Parma Nand
268 ITR 172 · 2004 · High Court
81
citing judgments

Whether there was sufficient cause for delay in making applications for registration under section 12A and 80G is always a question of fact, and contumacious conduct by the assessee must be established for levying penalty under section 271C for non-deduction of TDS.

Barendra Prasad Ray v. ITO
129 ITR 295 · 1981 · Supreme Court
80
citing judgments

When determining if an activity serves charitable purposes for tax exemption, the primary consideration is whether its predominant object is to make a profit or to carry out charitable activities.

Judgments citing registration under section 12A

Mangalayatan University, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh vs. Ld. CIT (Exemption), Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh

ITA 96/JAB/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Jul 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Sh. Kul Bharat & Sh. Nikhil Choudharya.Y. 2022-23 Mangalayatan University, Vs. Ld. Cit (Exemption), Bhopal, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh Madhya Pradesh Pan:Aaajm2753J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sh. K. Sampath & Sh. B. Rajkumar, Advocates Revenue By: Sh. Shrawan Kumar Meena, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 20.05.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 22.07.2025 O R D E R Per Nikhil Choudhary, A.M. This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Learned Cit (Exemption), Bhopal Against The Rejection Of The Application Filed By The Assessee Under Section 12Ab(1)(Ac)(Iii) Of The Income Tax Act. The Grounds Of Appeal Are Under:- “1. The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) Bhopal, Has Erred In Rejecting The Application Under Section 12Ab(1)(Ac)(Iii) Of The Act Filed By The Appellant Trust (M/S Mangalayatan University) On The Ground That Proper Books Of Accounts Have Not Been Maintained The Appellant Trust. Based On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Action Of Ld. Cit(Exemption) Of Rejecting The Application Filed U/S 12Ab(1)(Ac)(Iii) Of The Act Is Incorrect & Unlawful. 2. The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) Bhopal Has Erred In Rejecting The Application Filed By The Appellant Trust On The Ground That The Appellant Trust Have Not Complied With Csr Rules As Per Mca Notification Dated 22Nd January 2021 & Treated Violation Of Section 12Ab(1)(B)(I)(B) Of The Income Tax Act. Based On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Action Of Ld. Cit(Exemption) Of Rejecting The Application Filed U/S 12Ab(1)(Ac) (Iii) Of The Act Is Incorrect & Unlawful. 3. That On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, Ld. Cit (Exemption) Be Directed To Consider The Application & Grant The Registration Under Section 12Ab(1)(Ac)(Iii) Of The Act.

For Appellant: Sh. K. Sampath & Sh. B. Rajkumar, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Sh. Shrawan Kumar Meena, CIT DR
Section 12A

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JABALPUR BENCH, JABALPUR (By Virtual Mode) BEFORE SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH

Shree Satyay Mataji Mandir Mangroliya Parivar Trust Pithvajal, Amreli vs. The CIT(Exemption), Ahmedabad

ITA 844/RJT/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot21 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/.Ita No.844 & 845/Rjt/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष/Assessment Year: N.A. Shree Satyay Mataji Mandir Mangroliya Parivar Trust-Pithvajal Jisignpara Street No.2, Amreli, Gujarat-365601 Pan : Abits4939F (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) The Cit(Exemption), Ahmedabad Vs. (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) निर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee By : Shri D. M. Rindani, Ld.Ar राजस्व की ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख /Date Of Hearing : 08/07/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 21/07/2025 Order Per, Dr. Arjun Lal Saini: Captioned Two Appeals Filed By The Same Assessee, Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax(Exemption), Ahmedabad [In Short 'Ld.Cit(E)' Wherein The Ld.Cit(E) Has Rejected The Assessee'S Application In Form 10Ab U/S. 12(1)(Ac)(Vi) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961(Hereinafter Referred To As 'The Act') & The Ld. Cit(E) Also Rejected The Assessee'S Application In Form 10Ab, U/S. 80G(5)(Iv)(B) Of The Act Dated 30.08.2024. Shree Satyay Mataji Mandir Mangroliya Parivar Trust

For Appellant: Shri D. M. Rindani, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, CIT-DR
Section 12(1)(ac)Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)(iv)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT BEFORE DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI DINESH MOHAN