MANGALAYATAN UNIVERSITY,JABALPUR, MADHYA PRADESH vs. LD. CIT (EXEMPTION), BHOPAL, BHOPAL, MADHYA PRADESH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(Exemption)'s conclusion regarding incorrect interest payable was premature as all facts were not on record. Regarding CSR violation, the Tribunal noted that the assessee received funds, applied for registration promptly, and eventually obtained it. The Tribunal questioned whether belated compliance amounted to a violation of law or mere irregularity, suggesting that such determination should be made by authorities implementing the Companies Act.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Mangalayatan University, applied for registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application based on the grounds that the assessee did not maintain proper books of accounts and had violated CSR Rules by receiving CSR funds before obtaining registration. The assessee argued that the loan interest was confirmed and the CSR compliance was belated but not a violation.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of the registration application under Section 12AB was justified based on alleged improper maintenance of accounts and violation of CSR rules.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
12AB(1)(ac)(iii), 12AB(1)(b)(i)(B), 12AB(4)(f)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH, JABALPUR
PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M.
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the learned CIT (Exemption), Bhopal against the rejection of the application filed by the assessee under section 12AB(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The grounds of appeal are under:- “1. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) Bhopal, has erred in rejecting the application under section 12AB(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act filed by the Appellant Trust (M/s Mangalayatan University) on the ground that proper books of accounts have not been maintained the Appellant Trust. Based on the facts and circumstances of the case, the action of Ld. CIT(Exemption) of rejecting the application filed u/s 12AB(1)(ac)(iii) of t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026