← All Phrases

“maximum marginal rate”

Chapter I - PreliminarySection 2 - DefinitionsSection 2(29C) / ITR-6 Schedule 115TD587 judgments

The decision most relied on for maximum marginal rate is 1. Father Mullers Charitable Institutions 363 IT 230 (Kar.) 2. DIT(E) v. Sheth Mafatlal Gagalbhai Foundation Trust (249 ITR 533), cited in 108 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on maximum marginal rate

1. Father Mullers Charitable Institutions 363 IT 230 (Kar.) 2. DIT(E) v. Sheth Mafatlal Gagalbhai Foundation Trust
249 ITR 533 · 2001 · High Court
108
citing judgments

Income of a trust that is taxable at the maximum marginal rate should be taxed accordingly, while other income is eligible for exemption under Section 11 of the Income-tax Act.

DIT v. Bharat Diamond Bourse
259 ITR 280 · 2003 · Supreme Court
86
citing judgments

Violation of investment mandates under Section 13(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for a charitable trust results in the complete denial of exemption under Section 11 of the Act.

Trust (249 ITR 533) (Bom.) 3. CIT vs. Red Rose School (163 Taxman 19 (All.) 4. DIT(E) v. Alarippu (
172 ITR 698 · 1988 · High Court
61
citing judgments

Income received by a trust from sources like extra fees can be taxed at the maximum marginal rate, while other income remains eligible for exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act.

CWT v. Trustees of H.E.H. Nizam’s
108 ITR 555 · 1977 · Supreme Court
46
citing judgments

Where the shares of beneficiaries in a trust are determinate, trustees must be assessed separately for each beneficiary's share, treating each beneficiary as an individual. The income is then taxed at the marginal rate applicable to individuals, not at the maximum rate for an association of persons.

CIT v. Working Women’s Forum
365 ITR 353 · 2014 · High Court
34
citing judgments

When an exemption is denied under Section 13(1)(c) or (d), the denial of exemption applies only to the portion of income that violates these provisions, not the entire income.

CIT v. V.S. Dempo & Co. Pvt. Ltd.
336 ITR 209 · 2011 · High Court
27
citing judgments

Disallowance under Section 40A(2)(b) is not maintainable when both the payer and payee are assessed at the maximum marginal rate, as it results in a revenue-neutral situation.

Kar.) 2. DIT(E) vs. Sheth Mafatlal Gagalbhai Foundation Trust (249 ITR 533) (Bom.) 3. CIT v. Red Rose School (
224 ITR 358 · High Court
22
citing judgments

Income received by a trust that is considered 'extra fees' is taxable at the maximum marginal rate, while other income of the trust is eligible for exemption under Section 11.

Araadhya Jain Trust v. ITO
173 Taxmann.com 343 · 2025 · ITAT
22
citing judgments

The definition of maximum marginal rate under section 2(29C) can be interpreted to determine the applicable surcharge rates, particularly for income including dividends, as per the First Schedule to the Finance Act. This affects how surcharge is calculated on taxable income.

Judgments citing maximum marginal rate

Maharashtra Cricket Association, Pune vs. ACIT(E), Pune

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 975/PUN/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune11 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Astha Chandraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1387 & 975/Pun/2024 धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Years : 2011-12 & 2012-13 Maharashtra Cricket Association, Acit(E), Pune Gahunje Stadium, At Post Gahunje, Thehsil-Maval, Pune-412101 Vs. Pan : Aaatm2192D अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Assessee By : Shri C.H. Naniwadekar & Kiran Sanmane Department By : Shri Amol Khairnar Date Of Hearing : 16-01-2025 Date Of 11-04-2025 Pronouncement : आदेश / Order Per Astha Chandra, Jm : Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Two Separate Orders Dated 22.04.2024 & 12.03.2024 Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)/Nfac, Delhi [“Cit(A)”] Pertaining To Assessment Years (“Ays”) 2011-12 & 2012-13. Since The Issue(S) Involved Are Identical, These Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Common Order.

For Appellant: Shri C.H. Naniwadekar &For Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 11Section 2(15)

computing the income of the assessee as an AOP by recasting the income and expenditure statement at maximum marginal rate. The Ld. AO made the following major disallowances : “a. Withdrawal of Claim u/s 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and treating the Assessee as AOP liable for taxation

Maharashtra Cricket Association, Pune vs. ACIT(E), Pune

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1387/PUN/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune11 Apr 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Astha Chandraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1387 & 975/Pun/2024 धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Years : 2011-12 & 2012-13 Maharashtra Cricket Association, Acit(E), Pune Gahunje Stadium, At Post Gahunje, Thehsil-Maval, Pune-412101 Vs. Pan : Aaatm2192D अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Assessee By : Shri C.H. Naniwadekar & Kiran Sanmane Department By : Shri Amol Khairnar Date Of Hearing : 16-01-2025 Date Of 11-04-2025 Pronouncement : आदेश / Order Per Astha Chandra, Jm : Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Two Separate Orders Dated 22.04.2024 & 12.03.2024 Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)/Nfac, Delhi [“Cit(A)”] Pertaining To Assessment Years (“Ays”) 2011-12 & 2012-13. Since The Issue(S) Involved Are Identical, These Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Common Order.

For Appellant: Shri C.H. Naniwadekar &For Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 11Section 2(15)

computing the income of the assessee as an AOP by recasting the income and expenditure statement at maximum marginal rate. The Ld. AO made the following major disallowances : “a. Withdrawal of Claim u/s 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and treating the Assessee as AOP liable for taxation

Date Property Trust, Pune vs. ITO Ward 12(1), Pune

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 496/PUN/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 Apr 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.496/Pun/2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2023-24 Date Property Trust, V The Income Tax Officer, 265 A/3, Yashwant Building, S Ward-12(1), Pune. Shaniwarpeth, Opp.Omkareshwar Temple, Lokmanyanagar, S.O.Pune, Pune – 411030. Pan: Aaatd4736C Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Smt.Deepa Khare – Ar Revenue By Shri Harish Bist – Addl.Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 03/04/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 04/04/2025 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against The Order Of Ld.Additional/Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-2, Ahmedabad Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961, 30.12.2024 For Assessment Year 2023-24. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :

Section 143(1)Section 234Section 246ASection 250Section 250(4)Section 250(6)Section 251Section 251(1)(a)

appeal : ITA No.496/PUN/2025 [A] “1. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in taxing income of the trust at the maximum marginal rate instead of slab rate as applicable to AOP confirming THE TAX DEMAND OF Rs.48,408/-. 2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred ... ld.CIT(A). Ld.AR submitted that the issue involved is that under section 143(1) for A.Y.2023-24 Revenue has taxed assessee’s income at maximum marginal rate without giving any valid reason. Assessee had filed Return of Income on 24.07.2023, whereas due date for filing return was 31.07.2023, thus, return

Arulmigu Ayyappaswamy Temple, Coimbatore vs. ACIT, Exemptions, Coimbaotore

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are decided as detailed hereunder:-

ITA 3142/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Apr 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No3139/Chny/2024, Assessment Years-2015-16 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No3140/Chny/2024, Assessment Years-2016-17 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No3141/Chny/2024, Assessment Years-2017-18 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No3142/Chny/2024, Assessment Years-2018-19 Arulmigu Ayyappaswamy Temple, Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chinnaswamy Naidu Road, (Exemptions), New Siddhapudur, Siddhapudur Post, Coimbatore. Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu-641 044. [Pan: Aaeta8276C] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Mr..S.Sridhar, Advance (Erode) By Virtual प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Dr.I.Roopa, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27.02.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 04.04.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M : The Below Mentioned Appeals Have Been Filed By The Appellant Assessee For Ay-2015-16 To Ay-2018-19 Contesting The Order Of Ld. First Appellate Authority Indicated Column-E, Herein Below:- S. Appeal Ays Appellant Cit(A) Order Details Respondent No. Nos. A B C D E F Din & Order No. Itba / Nfac Arulmigu

For Appellant: Mr..S.Sridhar, Advance (Erode) by virtualFor Respondent: Dr.I.Roopa, Addl. CIT

taxes were levied on gross income and not on net in some years and in others they were taxed net but by applying maximum marginal rate of taxes. It was accordingly requested that all the matters be considered for restoration to the Ld.AO for passing fresh orders de novo drawing

Arulmigu Ayyappaswamy Temple, Coimbatore vs. ACIT, Exemptions, Coimbaotore

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are decided as detailed hereunder:-

ITA 3141/CHNY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No3139/Chny/2024, Assessment Years-2015-16 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No3140/Chny/2024, Assessment Years-2016-17 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No3141/Chny/2024, Assessment Years-2017-18 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No3142/Chny/2024, Assessment Years-2018-19 Arulmigu Ayyappaswamy Temple, Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chinnaswamy Naidu Road, (Exemptions), New Siddhapudur, Siddhapudur Post, Coimbatore. Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu-641 044. [Pan: Aaeta8276C] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Mr..S.Sridhar, Advance (Erode) By Virtual प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Dr.I.Roopa, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27.02.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 04.04.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M : The Below Mentioned Appeals Have Been Filed By The Appellant Assessee For Ay-2015-16 To Ay-2018-19 Contesting The Order Of Ld. First Appellate Authority Indicated Column-E, Herein Below:- S. Appeal Ays Appellant Cit(A) Order Details Respondent No. Nos. A B C D E F Din & Order No. Itba / Nfac Arulmigu

For Appellant: Mr..S.Sridhar, Advance (Erode) by virtualFor Respondent: Dr.I.Roopa, Addl. CIT

taxes were levied on gross income and not on net in some years and in others they were taxed net but by applying maximum marginal rate of taxes. It was accordingly requested that all the matters be considered for restoration to the Ld.AO for passing fresh orders de novo drawing

Arulmigu Aayyappaswamy Temple, Coimbatore vs. ACIT, Exemptions, Chennai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are decided as detailed hereunder:-

ITA 3140/CHNY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Apr 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No3139/Chny/2024, Assessment Years-2015-16 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No3140/Chny/2024, Assessment Years-2016-17 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No3141/Chny/2024, Assessment Years-2017-18 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No3142/Chny/2024, Assessment Years-2018-19 Arulmigu Ayyappaswamy Temple, Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chinnaswamy Naidu Road, (Exemptions), New Siddhapudur, Siddhapudur Post, Coimbatore. Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu-641 044. [Pan: Aaeta8276C] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Mr..S.Sridhar, Advance (Erode) By Virtual प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Dr.I.Roopa, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27.02.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 04.04.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M : The Below Mentioned Appeals Have Been Filed By The Appellant Assessee For Ay-2015-16 To Ay-2018-19 Contesting The Order Of Ld. First Appellate Authority Indicated Column-E, Herein Below:- S. Appeal Ays Appellant Cit(A) Order Details Respondent No. Nos. A B C D E F Din & Order No. Itba / Nfac Arulmigu

For Appellant: Mr..S.Sridhar, Advance (Erode) by virtualFor Respondent: Dr.I.Roopa, Addl. CIT

taxes were levied on gross income and not on net in some years and in others they were taxed net but by applying maximum marginal rate of taxes. It was accordingly requested that all the matters be considered for restoration to the Ld.AO for passing fresh orders de novo drawing

Arulmigu Ayyappaswamy Temple, Coimbatore vs. ACIT, Exemptions, Coimbatore

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are decided as detailed hereunder:-

ITA 3139/CHNY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Apr 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No3139/Chny/2024, Assessment Years-2015-16 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No3140/Chny/2024, Assessment Years-2016-17 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No3141/Chny/2024, Assessment Years-2017-18 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No3142/Chny/2024, Assessment Years-2018-19 Arulmigu Ayyappaswamy Temple, Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chinnaswamy Naidu Road, (Exemptions), New Siddhapudur, Siddhapudur Post, Coimbatore. Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu-641 044. [Pan: Aaeta8276C] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Mr..S.Sridhar, Advance (Erode) By Virtual प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Dr.I.Roopa, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27.02.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 04.04.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M : The Below Mentioned Appeals Have Been Filed By The Appellant Assessee For Ay-2015-16 To Ay-2018-19 Contesting The Order Of Ld. First Appellate Authority Indicated Column-E, Herein Below:- S. Appeal Ays Appellant Cit(A) Order Details Respondent No. Nos. A B C D E F Din & Order No. Itba / Nfac Arulmigu

For Appellant: Mr..S.Sridhar, Advance (Erode) by virtualFor Respondent: Dr.I.Roopa, Addl. CIT

taxes were levied on gross income and not on net in some years and in others they were taxed net but by applying maximum marginal rate of taxes. It was accordingly requested that all the matters be considered for restoration to the Ld.AO for passing fresh orders de novo drawing