Araadhya Jain Trust v. ITO

173 Taxmann.com 343Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2025#5429 most cited
22

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2025 to 2026.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Araadhya Jain Trust v. ITO

ROSE TRUST,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed as above

ITA 725/DEL/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Oct 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraita No.725/Del/2025, A.Y. 2023-24 Rose Trust, Dy. Commissioner Of B-60/61, C/O Bajaj Auto Ltd., Income Tax, Circle-49(1), Naraina Ind. Area, Phase-Ii, Vs. Civic Centre, Mito Road New Delhi-110028 New Delhi Pan: Aaatr0380G (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Ms. Vasanti Patel, Ar Sh. Mahendra Gohel, Ca Respondent By Sh. Om Prakash, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 10/10/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 31/10/2025 Order Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am This Appeal Of The Assessee For The Assessment Year (‘Ay’) 2023-24 Is Directed Against The Order Dated 31.12.2024 Of The Additional/Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal), Mysore [‘Addl. Cit(A)’].

Section 11Section 115ASection 115BSection 143(1)Section 154Section 2

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘C’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.725/Del/2025, A.Y. 2023-24 Rose Trust, Dy. Commissioner of B-60/61, C/o Bajaj Auto Ltd., Income Tax, Circle-49(1), Naraina Ind. Area, Phase-II, Vs. Civic Centre, Mito Road New Delhi-110028 New Delhi PAN: AAATR0380G (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Ms. Vasanti Patel, AR Sh. Mahendra Gohel, CA Respondent by Sh. Om Prakash, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 10/10/2025 Date of Pronouncement 31/10/2025 ORDER PER AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA, AM This appeal of the as…

SHRI RAMPURUSH MANDIR SOCIETY,CUNCOLIM vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX - CPC, BANGALORE

ITA 76/PAN/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji26 Aug 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 75 & 76/Pan/2025 Assessment Year : 2021-22 & 2022-23 Shri Rampurush Mandir Society Veroda, Cuncolim, Salcete, Goa-403703. Pan : Aadas9268E . . . . . . . Appellant V/S Asstt. Director Of Income Tax, Cpc, Bengaluru. . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee By : Mr Narcinva Lotlikar [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Ish Gupta [‘Ld. Dr’] Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 25/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 26/08/2025 Order Per G. D. Padmahshali; The Twin Appeals Of The Appellant Assessee Impugns Separate Din & Orders Both Dt. 10/03/2025 Passed By The Addl./Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Appeals(2), Kolkata [‘Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac’ Hereinafter] U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [‘The Act’ Hereinafter] Which In Turn Emanated Out Of Respective Summary Assessment Dt. 23/09/2022 & 16/03/2023 Passed U/S 143(1) Of The Act By The National Faceless E-Asstt Centre [‘Ld. Ao’ Hereinafter] Anent To Assessment Years 2021- 22 & 2022-23 [‘Ays’ Hereinafter].

For Appellant: Mr Narcinva Lotlikar [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Ish Gupta [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 143(1)Section 164Section 167BSection 2Section 246ASection 250

…pplied according to slabs prescribed under the relevant Finance Act or to be applied correspondingly at the highest rate with applicable MMR is no more res-integra in view of the decision of Ld. Special Bench in the case of ‘Araadhya Jain Trust Vs ITO’ [2025, 173 Taxmann.com 343 (Mum)]. The ratio laid therein ITAT-Panaji Page 17 of 18 Shri Rampurush Mandir Society Vs CPC ITA Nos.75 & 76/PAN/2025 AY: 2021-22 & 2022-23 that, where any income of an assessee is charged to tax @MMR, the surcharge (if any) to be charged thereon shall be computed on the income tax having reference to the slab rates prescribed in the…

SHRI RAMPURUSH MANDIR SOCIETY,CUNCOLIM vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, CPC, BANGALORE

ITA 75/PAN/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji26 Aug 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 75 & 76/Pan/2025 Assessment Year : 2021-22 & 2022-23 Shri Rampurush Mandir Society Veroda, Cuncolim, Salcete, Goa-403703. Pan : Aadas9268E . . . . . . . Appellant V/S Asstt. Director Of Income Tax, Cpc, Bengaluru. . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee By : Mr Narcinva Lotlikar [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Ish Gupta [‘Ld. Dr’] Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 25/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 26/08/2025 Order Per G. D. Padmahshali; The Twin Appeals Of The Appellant Assessee Impugns Separate Din & Orders Both Dt. 10/03/2025 Passed By The Addl./Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Appeals(2), Kolkata [‘Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac’ Hereinafter] U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [‘The Act’ Hereinafter] Which In Turn Emanated Out Of Respective Summary Assessment Dt. 23/09/2022 & 16/03/2023 Passed U/S 143(1) Of The Act By The National Faceless E-Asstt Centre [‘Ld. Ao’ Hereinafter] Anent To Assessment Years 2021- 22 & 2022-23 [‘Ays’ Hereinafter].

For Appellant: Mr Narcinva Lotlikar [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Ish Gupta [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 143(1)Section 164Section 167BSection 2Section 246ASection 250

…pplied according to slabs prescribed under the relevant Finance Act or to be applied correspondingly at the highest rate with applicable MMR is no more res-integra in view of the decision of Ld. Special Bench in the case of ‘Araadhya Jain Trust Vs ITO’ [2025, 173 Taxmann.com 343 (Mum)]. The ratio laid therein ITAT-Panaji Page 17 of 18 Shri Rampurush Mandir Society Vs CPC ITA Nos.75 & 76/PAN/2025 AY: 2021-22 & 2022-23 that, where any income of an assessee is charged to tax @MMR, the surcharge (if any) to be charged thereon shall be computed on the income tax having reference to the slab rates prescribed in the…

M V SUBRAMANIAN FAMILY TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW-1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1087/CHNY/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Aug 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1087/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2021-22 M/S. M V Subramanian Family The Income Tax Officer, Trust, Non-Corporate Ward 1(1), 10, Valliammai Achi Road, Vs. Chennai. Kotturpuram, Chennai – 600 085. Pan: Aaetm 9151C (""यथ"/Respondent) (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri Ashwin, Ca ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. Anitha, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24.07.2025 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 25.08.2025

For Appellant: Shri Ashwin, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Anitha, Addl.CIT
Section 111ASection 112ASection 143(1)Section 154Section 2Section 234BSection 234C

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,‘सी’ "यायपीठ,चे"नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी मनु कुमार "ग"र, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी एस.आर.रघुनाथा, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.: 1087/CHNY/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2021-22 M/s. M V Subramanian Family The Income Tax Officer, Trust, Non-Corporate Ward 1(1), 10, Valliammai Achi Road, Vs. Chennai. Kotturpuram, Chennai – 600 085. PAN: AAETM 9151C (""यथ"/Respondent) (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant by : Shri Ashwin, CA ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent by : Ms.…

Showing 120 of 22 · Page 1 of 2