← All Phrases

“liable to tax”

Chapter I - PreliminarySection 2 - DefinitionsSection 2(29A)2,645 judgments

The decision most relied on for liable to tax is DIT v. NGC Network Asia LLC (313 ITR 187), cited in 144 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on liable to tax

DIT v. NGC Network Asia LLC
313 ITR 187 · 2009 · High Court
144
citing judgments

Where a duty is cast on the payer to deduct and pay tax at source under Section 195, the payee-assessee cannot be levied interest under Section 234B for failure to pay advance tax if the payer defaults on its TDS obligation. This principle may also extend to interest under Section 234C.

CIT v. Nestle India Ltd.
14 Taxmann 99 · 1983 · High Court
125
citing judgments

Club entrance fees, if incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes, are allowable as revenue expenditure under Section 37(1). Furthermore, an order holding a deductor liable for TDS defaults under Section 201 must be preceded by an inquiry into the deductee's actual tax payment.

CIT v. Karnataka Power Corporation
247 ITR 268 · 2001 · Supreme Court
124
citing judgments

Income earned during the project construction stage, which has a direct nexus or is inextricably linked to the project's setting up, constitutes a capital receipt not liable to tax and reduces the project cost.

CIT v. Rasoi Ltd.
335 ITR 438 · 2011 · High Court
107
citing judgments

Sales tax subsidies and Industrial Promotion Assistance received under the West Bengal Incentive Scheme are capital receipts and therefore not liable to tax. The ruling clarifies the inapplicability of the Sahney Steel judgment to such subsidies.

(supra), Rama Bai v. CIT
181 ITR 408 · 1990 · Supreme Court
84
citing judgments

Interest received on delayed payment or enhanced compensation awarded under compulsory acquisition is a revenue receipt and is liable to income tax.

Bank Vs. ACIT (2005) 142 Taxman 98 (Kerala) (v) CIT(TDS) v. Director, DPS
115 ITD 411 · ITAT
81
citing judgments

The case is an authority regarding the conditions under which an assessee can be held liable, and orders confirmed, under Section 201(1) of the Income-tax Act for failure to deduct tax at source (TDS). It clarifies the circumstances for deeming an assessee to be in default for non-deduction or non-payment of TDS.

CIT v. Chaphalkar Brothers
351 ITR 309 · 2013 · High Court
77
citing judgments

A subsidy or incentive provided by the government for meeting capital expenditure, to achieve a national objective or public interest, is a capital receipt and thus not liable to income tax. The nature of the subsidy is determined by applying the 'purpose test'.

CIT v. Wipro Ltd. (
70 Taxmann.com 129 · Reported
77
citing judgments

Payments are liable for deduction of tax at source when they are in the nature of royalty. The withholding tax liability can be worked out by applying a proportion to the total remittance.

Judgments citing liable to tax

Prem Trading Co, Kalanwali vs. Income Tax Officer, Sirsa

The appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed

ITA 483/CHANDI/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh09 Dec 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Sanjay Gargआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No. 483/Chd/2024 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2023-24 बनाम Prem Trading Co., Income Tax Officer 16, Nai Mandi, Kalanwali, Sirsa Haryana 125201 "थायीलेखासं./Pan No: Aahfp 2628Q अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent (Physical Hearing) "नधा"रतीक"ओरसे/Assessee By : Ms. Ashisha Mittal, C.A. राज"वक"ओरसे/ Revenue By : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. D.R. सुनवाईक"तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 12.11.2024 उदघोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 09.12.2024 आदेश/Order The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Appeal Addl/Jcit(A)-5, Mumbai [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Ld. Cit(A)”] Dated 28.02.2024 For The Assessment Year 2023-24. 2. The Assessee In This Appeal Has Raised The Followings Grounds Of Appeal:

For Appellant: Ms. Ashisha Mittal, C.AFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. D.R
Section 194HSection 194Q

ought to have been deducted in the name of the farmers ignoring the fact that income of the farmers is not liable to tax and hence they are not liable to file income tax return. 5. The appellant craves leave to add, delete, modify/amend the above grounds of appeal