TRACTORS AND FARM EQUIPMENT LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(2), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that payments made for services utilized in a business carried on outside India for earning income from a source outside India are excluded from the deeming provisions of Section 9(1) of the Income Tax Act. Warranty obligations are part of sales transactions and not fees for technical services.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a tractor manufacturer, reimbursed overseas distributors for warranty expenses. The Assessing Officer (AO) held that tax should have been deducted at source on these reimbursements, treating them as fees for technical services. The Commissioner (Appeals) granted partial relief, directing the AO to ascertain repair charges excluding material costs.
What were the issues?
Whether reimbursements for warranty expenses to overseas distributors constitute 'fees for technical services' requiring TDS deduction. Whether payments for services utilized outside India for earning income outside India are taxable in India.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM: These are appeals preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, (hereinafter in short "the Ld.CIT(A)”), Chennai-16, dated 05.04.2024 for the Assessment
Year (hereinafter in short "AY”) 2012-13 & 2013-14 respectively. Both
sides agreed that the facts & grounds of appeal are same in both the ITA Nos.1676 & 1
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 9(1)(vii)(b)
- Sasken Technologies Limited, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle-6(1)(1), BangaloreITA 2058/BANG/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Jun 2026AY 2020-21
- Sasken Technologies Limited, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle-6(1)(1), BangaloreITA 2057/BANG/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Jun 2026AY 2017-18
- Income Tax Officer, Minto Road vs Hcl Technologies Ltd., Nehru PlaceITITA 59/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed23 Mar 2026AY 2020-21
- Income Tax Officer, Minto Road vs Hcl Technologies Limited, Nehru PlaceITITA 58/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed23 Mar 2026AY 2019-20
- General Reinsurance Ag, Mumbai vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 887/MUM/2023[2020-21]Status: Disposed30 Jan 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026