Section 9(1)(vii)(b) of the Income Tax Act
The decision most relied on for Section 9(1)(vii)(b) is CIT v. Havells India Ltd. (352 ITR 376), cited in 97 of the 45 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.
Leading authorities on Section 9(1)(vii)(b)
For royalty income, especially in the context of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAA), the 'source of income' is the determinative factor for taxability, rather than merely the 'source of receipt'.
The case elucidates the meaning of 'management services', detailing its components and considering whether such services qualify as 'technical services' for income tax purposes, particularly in relation to fees for technical services.
Payments made for services that are utilized for earning income from outside India, where the customers are foreign-based companies, are not taxable in India as Fees for Technical Services, particularly when excluded by Section 9(1)(vii)(b) of the Income-tax Act.
Income is not taxable in India if it arises from a business carried on outside India or is earned from a source outside India. The payment to a non-resident service provider with no business activity in India is not taxable in India.
Judgments on Section 9(1)(vii)(b)
Showing 1–20 of 45 · Page 1 of 3