← All Phrases

“short deduction of TDS”

DisallowancesSection 40(a)(ia)Section 40(a)(ia)177 judgments

The decision most relied on for short deduction of TDS is CIT v. Ansal Landmark Township (P.) Ltd. (61 Taxmann.com 45), cited in 177 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on short deduction of TDS

CIT v. Ansal Landmark Township (P.) Ltd.
61 Taxmann.com 45 · 2015 · High Court
177
citing judgments

Disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) cannot be made when the assessee has deducted tax at a lesser rate, as opposed to no deduction. The second proviso to section 40(a)(ia) is applicable retrospectively, mitigating disallowance where tax is deposited by the recipient.

CIT v. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd.
292 ITR 636 · 2007 · High Court
153
citing judgments

The deduction of tax at source under section 192 is not to be considered short if the employer makes a bona fide estimate of the taxable salary income of the employee.

CIT v. S.K. Tekriwal
361 ITR 432 · 2014 · High Court
150
citing judgments

Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act does not apply to disallow expenses when there is a short deduction of tax at source. This includes situations where TDS is deducted at a lower rate than required or under an incorrect section.

DIT v. Jacabs Civil Incorporated/ Mitsubhishi Corporation
330 ITR 578 · 2011 · High Court
115
citing judgments

Interest under Section 234B is generally not leviable on non-residents whose income is subject to tax deduction at source under Section 195, provided the non-resident assessee did not induce short or non-deduction of TDS by the payer.

Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd. v. CIT
196 ITR 406 · 1992 · High Court
37
citing judgments

Interest levied for delayed payment or short deduction of TDS is not an allowable business expenditure.

State Bank of India v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax
144 Taxmann.com 131 · 2022 · Supreme Court
35
citing judgments

An assessee is required to deduct tax at source on reimbursements, even if the assessee acted under a bona fide belief that such reimbursements were exempt.

DCIT v. Chandabhoy & Jassobhoy
49 SOT 448 · 2012 · ITAT
24
citing judgments

Section 40(a)(ia) is not applicable where tax has been deducted at source, even if at a lower rate than required, due to a difference in opinion regarding the nature of the payment.

(RE: CIT v. SK Tekriwal
90 DTR 26 · 2013 · High Court
20
citing judgments

Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act for short deduction of TDS is not permissible if tax has been deducted, even if under a bona fide wrong impression of the correct TDS provision.

Judgments citing short deduction of TDS

Expertease (India) Private Limited, Mumbai vs. ITO TDS 1(2)(2), Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for

ITA 1594/MUM/2024[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Jul 2024AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri Renu Jauhrii Ta. No. 1594/Mum/2024 (A.Y.2009-10) Expertease (India) Pvt Ltd, Vs Ito (Tds)-1(2)(2) 3102, Gokul Concorde, Roomno. 805, 8Th Flr, Thakur Village, Smt K G Mittal Kandivali (East), Ayurvedic Hospitalbldg Mumbai-400101. Charni Road, Mumbai-400002. Pan/Gir No. Aabce2693P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) Appellant By Shri Prakash Jotwani. Ar Respondent By Shri P.D Chougule. Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing 27.06.2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 29.07.2024 Order Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed The Appeal Against The Common Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)(Cit(A))- 59 Mumbai Passed U/Sec 201(1)/201(1A) & U/Sec 250 Of The Act. 2. At The Time Of Hearing, It Was Brought To The Knowledge Of The Bench That, The Assessee Has Filed The Appeal Electronically On 07.12.2018 & Emphasized On Facts & Relied On The Affidavit Of The Director Of The Assesse Company As Under:

Section 194Section 194CSection 194HSection 201

TDS certificates were not issued in time (iii) non-payment of TDS liability on time and (iv) non deduction of TDS and short deduction of TDS. In compliance, the Ld. AR of the assessee appeared from time to time and submitted the details. The A.O on verification of the details ... found that in the F.Y 2008-09m there is a delay in depositing the TDS and short deduction of TDS and accordingly dealt on the provisions of the Act and the A.O on the expenditure claimed by the asssessee has raised the demand u/sec 201(1)and u/sec