DIT v. Jacabs Civil Incorporated/ Mitsubhishi Corporation

330 ITR 578High Court2011#933 most cited

What is DIT v. Jacabs Civil Incorporated/ Mitsubhishi Corporation authority for?

Interest under Section 234B is generally not leviable on non-residents whose income is subject to tax deduction at source under Section 195, provided the non-resident assessee did not induce short or non-deduction of TDS by the payer.

115

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2012 to 2025.

Also referred to as

DIT v. Jacabs Civil Incorporated · DIT v. Mitsubishi Corporation · 330 ITR 578 · Section 234B interest non-resident · Advance tax non-resident · Tax deductible at source Section 195 · Assessee role short deduction TDS · Non-liability interest Section 234B · Section 154 mistake apparent record · Rectification interest levy · Permanent establishment advance tax · Interest under section 234B

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing DIT v. Jacabs Civil Incorporated/ Mitsubhishi Corporation

SCHLUMBERGER ASIA SERVICES LTD.,GURGAON vs. DDIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 6437/DEL/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun05 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri C.N. Prasad[Assessment Year: 2011-12] Schlumberger Asia Services Deputy Director Of Income Tax Limited, (International Taxation), 14Th Floor, Tower C, Building Dehradun No.1, Dlf City, Phase Ii, Gurgaon-122002 Pan-Aadcs1107J Assessee Revenue [Assessment Year: 2011-12] Deputy Director Of Income Tax Schlumberger Asia Services (International Taxation), Limited, Dehradun 14Th Floor, Tower C, Building No.1, Dlf City, Phase Ii, Gurgaon-122002 Pan- Aadcs1107J Revenue Assessee Assessee By Sh. Salil Kapoor, Adv. Ms. Ananya Kappor & Ms. Soumya Singh, Adv. Revenue By Sh. T.S.Mapwal, Sr.Dr

Section 143(3)Section 44BSection 44DSection 9

…resident assessee/payee/deductee has played a role in inducing non-deduction or short-deduction on the part of the payer/deductor. b. The Ld.CIT(A) has erred in failing to take note of the observations of the Hon’ble High Court in the case of M/s Mitsubishi [330 ITR 578, Del] that the role of the assessee/payee/deductee in short-deduction or non¬deduction of tax needs to be ascertained before claim regarding non¬liability to interest u/s 234B of the Act is accepted, a proposition affirmed subsequently in the case of M/s Alcatel Lucent (judgment of Delhi High Court dated 07.11.2013 in ITA No. 327 & Ors of 2012).…

Showing 120 of 115 · Page 1 of 6