← All Phrases

“disallowance u/s 14A”

DisallowancesSection 14ASection 14A2,938 judgments

The decision most relied on for disallowance u/s 14A is CIT v. Corrtech Energy (P.) Ltd. (223 Taxmann 130), cited in 579 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on disallowance u/s 14A

CIT v. Corrtech Energy (P.) Ltd.
223 Taxmann 130 · 2014 · High Court
579
citing judgments

Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D is not warranted if the assessee has not earned any exempt income in the relevant assessment year.

CIT v. Gem Plus Jewellery India Ltd.
330 ITR 175 · 2011 · High Court
207
citing judgments

Disallowances made under various sections, such as for PF/ESIC contributions, result in an increase in business profits, and these enhanced profits are eligible for deduction under Sections 10A and 10AA. Similarly, gains from foreign exchange fluctuations directly linked to export sales are also eligible for deduction under Section 10A.

Cargo Motors (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT
145 Taxmann.com 641 · 2022 · High Court
46
citing judgments

The disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, particularly Rule 8D(iii) for administrative expenses, should only consider investments that have actually yielded exempt income during the relevant assessment year. Section 14A empowers the Assessing Officer to determine expenditure related to income not forming part of total income.

Sobha Developers Ltd. v. DCIT
125 Taxmann.com 72 · 2021 · High Court
44
citing judgments

Disallowance under section 14A is a notional disallowance and cannot be added back while computing Book Profits under section 115JB for Minimum Alternate Tax purposes.

Tata Industries Ltd. v. ITO
181 TTJ 600 · 2016 · ITAT
29
citing judgments

Disallowance under Section 14A cannot exceed the exempt income earned by the assessee. Even if interest expenditure is considered, it cannot be solely attributed to earning exempt dividend income as investors also consider potential capital gains.

PCIT v. J.J. Glastronics (P.) Ltd.
139 Taxmann.com 375 · 2022 · High Court
28
citing judgments

Additions made under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, read with Rule 8D, cannot be considered for computing book profit under Section 115JB of the Act.

M/s.Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. ACIT
38 DTR 282 · 2010 · Reported
26
citing judgments

Section 14A of the Income-tax Act is not applicable to insurance businesses governed by specific provisions of Section 44 and Schedule 1. Profit on sale of investments by insurance companies is not taxable, especially after the deletion of sub-rule (b) of Rule 5 of the First Schedule.

PCIT v. Dipesh Lalchand Shah
143 Taxmann.com 419 · 2022 · High Court
18
citing judgments

Disallowance under section 14A cannot be made if the assessee has not earned any exempt income in the relevant assessment year. This applies even if the assessee has made investments in shares or has income from a partnership that is negative.

Judgments citing disallowance u/s 14A

Rakesh Bhatt, New Delhi vs. ACIT Central Circle-18, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1181/DEL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Mar 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shris.Rifaur Rahmanbhl Forex & Finlease Limited, Vs. Dcit, Central Circle - 2, 6, Mohan Singh Place, New Delhi. Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001. (Pan : Aabcb8886H) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Ms. Gini Gandhi, Advocate Ms. Anu Bajaj, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 13.03.2025 Date Of Order : 14.05.2025 O R D E R 1. The Assessee Has Filed This Appeal Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-23, New Delhi [“Ld. Cit(A)”, For Short] Dated 11.07.2023 For The Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. At The Time Of Hearing, Ld. Ar Of The Assessee Submitted That The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against Imposition Of Penalty Under Section 271(1)(C) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (For Short ‘The Act’). In This Regard, He Submitted That Assessee Has Filed Its Original Return Of Income U/S 139(4) Of The Act Which Was Belated Return & Declared The Loss. As Per The Provisions Of The Act, The Losses Declared In The Belated Returns

For Appellant: Ms. Gini Gandhi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 139Section 139(4)Section 147Section 148Section 14ASection 271(1)(c)

Addition on account of disallowance of expenses of 96,84,734/- (suo moto Rs.96,84,734 disallowed) Addition on account of disallowance u/s 14A of the 1,56,583/- (suo moto Act disallowed) Addition on account of late deposit of TDS/ST 1,28,064/- (suo moto disallowed) (vi) Any other

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Ludhiana vs. Oasis Commercial Private Limited, Chandigarh

The appeal of the revenue stand dismissed

ITA 544/CHANDI/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh24 Mar 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.414/Chandi/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17) M/S Oasis Commercial Pvt. Ltd. Dcit- Circle-2 Village Jatwar Tehsil Naraingarh बनाम/ Central Revenue Building District Ambala-134201 Opp. Bvm School Vs. Kitchlu Nagar, Ludhiana 141001 & 2. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.544/Chandi/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17) Dcit- Circle-2 M/S Oasis Commercial Pvt. Ltd. Central Revenue Building Village Jatwar Tehsil Naraingarh बनाम/ Vs. Opp. Bvm School District Ambala-134201 Kitchlu Nagar, Ludhiana 141001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaaco-8412-B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri Sudhir Sehgal (Advocate) – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Ms. Kusum Bansal (Cit)- Ld. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18-03-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 24-03-2025 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal ()

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Ms. Kusum Bansal (CIT)- Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 68

order so. The appeal of the revenue stand dismissed. Assessee’s Appeal 4.1 The sole subject matter of assessee’s appeal is disallowance u/s 14A. The assessee earned exempt dividend income of Rs.3.50 Lacs but did not offer any disallowance u/s 14A on the ground that no expenses were incurred

Oasis Commercial Pvt. Ltd, Vill. Jatwar District Ambala vs. DCIT, Central Circle-2, Income Tax Department

The appeal of the revenue stand dismissed

ITA 414/CHANDI/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh24 Mar 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.414/Chandi/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17) M/S Oasis Commercial Pvt. Ltd. Dcit- Circle-2 Village Jatwar Tehsil Naraingarh बनाम/ Central Revenue Building District Ambala-134201 Opp. Bvm School Vs. Kitchlu Nagar, Ludhiana 141001 & 2. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.544/Chandi/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17) Dcit- Circle-2 M/S Oasis Commercial Pvt. Ltd. Central Revenue Building Village Jatwar Tehsil Naraingarh बनाम/ Vs. Opp. Bvm School District Ambala-134201 Kitchlu Nagar, Ludhiana 141001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaaco-8412-B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri Sudhir Sehgal (Advocate) – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Ms. Kusum Bansal (Cit)- Ld. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18-03-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 24-03-2025 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal ()

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Ms. Kusum Bansal (CIT)- Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 68

order so. The appeal of the revenue stand dismissed. Assessee’s Appeal 4.1 The sole subject matter of assessee’s appeal is disallowance u/s 14A. The assessee earned exempt dividend income of Rs.3.50 Lacs but did not offer any disallowance u/s 14A on the ground that no expenses were incurred