Section 40(1)(i) — 12 judgments | BharatTax

DAMODAR MANGALJI & COMPANY LIMITED,PANAJI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 1(1), PANAJI

Appeals stands DISMISSED

ITA 35/PAN/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji18 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 034 & 035/Pan/2025 Assessment Year : 2011-12 & 2014-15 Damodar Mangalji & Company Ltd. Damodar Niwas, 1St Floor, Mc Road, Panaji, Goa-403001. Pan : Aaacd6880G . . . . . . . Appellant V/S Jt./Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1/Circle-1(1), Goa. . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee By : Adv Rahul Sarda [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr M Satish [‘Ld. Dr’] Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 20/11/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 18/12/2025 Order Per G. D. Padmahshali; The Captioned Twin Appeals Of Assessee Instituted U/S 253(1) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [‘The Act’] Are Directed Against Separate Din & Order 1070138041(1) Dt. 08/11/2024 & 1070321994(1) Dt. 13/11/2024 Passed U/S 250 Of The Act By National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Ld. Nfac/Cit(A)’] Which Sprang From Assessment Orders Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Act Anent To Assessment Years 2011-12 & 2014-15 [‘Ay’].

For Appellant: Adv Rahul Sarda [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr M Satish [‘Ld. DR’]

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250Section 253(1)Section 253(3)Section 37(1)Section 40(1)(i)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, GOA BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI

DAMODAR MANGALJI & COMPANY LIMITED,PANAJI vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE - 1, PANAJI

Appeals stands DISMISSED

ITA 34/PAN/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji18 Dec 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 034 & 035/Pan/2025 Assessment Year : 2011-12 & 2014-15 Damodar Mangalji & Company Ltd. Damodar Niwas, 1St Floor, Mc Road, Panaji, Goa-403001. Pan : Aaacd6880G . . . . . . . Appellant V/S Jt./Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1/Circle-1(1), Goa. . . . . . . . Respondent Appearances Assessee By : Adv Rahul Sarda [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr M Satish [‘Ld. Dr’] Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 20/11/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 18/12/2025 Order Per G. D. Padmahshali; The Captioned Twin Appeals Of Assessee Instituted U/S 253(1) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [‘The Act’] Are Directed Against Separate Din & Order 1070138041(1) Dt. 08/11/2024 & 1070321994(1) Dt. 13/11/2024 Passed U/S 250 Of The Act By National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Ld. Nfac/Cit(A)’] Which Sprang From Assessment Orders Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Act Anent To Assessment Years 2011-12 & 2014-15 [‘Ay’].

For Appellant: Adv Rahul Sarda [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr M Satish [‘Ld. DR’]

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250Section 253(1)Section 253(3)Section 37(1)Section 40(1)(i)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, GOA BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI

ACIT , SPL. RANGE-9, NEW DELHI vs. TIMEX GROUP INDIA LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 7598/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vimal Kumar\Nand\Nshri Brajesh Kumar Singh\Nita No.7526/Del/2019\N[Assessment Year: 2013-14]\N\Nm/S Timex Group India Ltd.\N106-107, Ambadeep Building,\Nkasturba Gandhi Marg,\Nnew Delhi-110001\Npan-Aaact0773C\Nassessee\Nvs\Nadditional Commissioner Of Income\Ntax, Special Range-9,\Nnew Delhi-110002\Nrevenue\Nita No.7598/Del/2019\N[Assessment Year: 2013-14]\N\Nadditional Commissioner Of\Nincome Tax, Special Range-9,\Nnew Delhi-110002\Nm/S Timex Group India Ltd.\N106-107, Ambadeep Building,\Nvs Kasturba Gandhi Marg,\Nnew Delhi-110001\Npan-Aaact0773C\Nrevenue\Nassessee\Nassessee By\Nshri Tushar Jarwal, Adv.\Nshri Aayush Nagpal, Adv. &\Nshri Vikrant Maheshwari, Adv.\Nrevenue By\Nshri Rohit Garg, Cit-Dr\Ndate Of Hearing\N01.07.2025\Ndate Of Pronouncement\N26.09.2025\Norder\Nper Brajesh Kumar Singh, Am,\Nthese Are Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee As Well As By\Nthe Revenue, Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of\Nincome Tax (Appeals)-44, New Delhi, Dated 28.06.2019 Arising\Nfrom The Assessment Order Dated 07.02.2017 Passed Under\Nsection 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred\Nto As 'The Act') Relating To Assessment Year 2013-14.\N1.

Section 143(3)Section 40Section 92Section 92BSection 92C

{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL\nDELHI BENCH, ‘D’: NEW DELHI\nBEFORE SHRI VIMAL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER\nAND

TIMEX GROUP INDIA LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADDI. CIT SPL.RANGE-9, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 7526/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vimal Kumar & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2013-14] M/S Timex Group India Ltd. Additional Commissioner Of Income 106-107, Ambadeep Building, Tax, Special Range-9, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, Vs New Delhi-110002 New Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaact0773C Assessee Revenue [Assessment Year: 2013-14] Additional Commissioner Of M/S Timex Group India Ltd. Income Tax, Special Range-9, 106-107, Ambadeep Building, New Delhi-110002 Vs Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaact0773C Revenue Assessee Assessee By Shri Tushar Jarwal, Adv. Shri Aayush Nagpal, Adv. & Shri Vikrant Maheshwari, Adv. Revenue By Shri Rohit Garg, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 01.07.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 26.09.2025

Section 143(3)Section 40Section 92Section 92BSection 92C

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH, ‘D’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI VIMAL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI BRAJESH

MACE PROJECT AND COST MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 16(1), DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 955/DEL/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Vimal Kumarassessment Year: 2017-18 Mace Project & Cost Vs. Dcit, Management Private Limited, Circle 16(1), 01A171 & 01A172, New Delhi Platina Tower, M.G. Road, Sector 28, Gurgaon-122002 Haryana Pin 122002 Pan No. Aahcm0132D (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Manish Garg, CAFor Respondent: Shri Choudhary, Sr. DR

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40(1)(i)

portal and the case was completed under e- proceedings. On completion of proceedings, Ld. AO vide order dated 11.12.2019 made various additions under Section 40(1)(i) of the Act. The assessee against order dated 11.12.2019 filed appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), which was dismissed vide order dated

SAHANA BUILDERS DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. CIT(A) 52, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2217/MUM/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Dec 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Gagan Goyalm/S Sahana Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd., 402, Plot No.54, Sagar Avenue, S.V. Road, Andheri (West), Mumbai-400058. Pan: Aahcs4782P ...... Appellant Vs. Cit(A)-52, 6Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Marg, Mumbai-400020. ..... Respondent Dy.Cit-4(2), Room No. 1918, 19Th Floor, Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. ..... Appellant Vs. M/S Sahana Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd., 402, Plot No.54B, Junction Of S.V. Road & Lallubhai Park, Andheri (West), Mumbai-400058. Pan: Aahcs4782P ...... Respondent Appellant/Assessee By : Sh. Amit Bothra & Ms. Manish Chandak, Ar Respondent/Revenue By : Sh. Soumendu Kumar Dash- Sr. Dr M/S Sahana Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Date Of Hearing : 14/09/2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 12/12/2022 Order Per Gagan Goyal, A.M:

For Appellant: Sh. Amit Bothra &For Respondent: Sh. Soumendu Kumar Dash- Sr. DR

Section 14ASection 36Section 36(1)(ii)Section 37(1)Section 41(1)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “G”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GAGAN GOYAL

M/S. STANDARD CHARTERED BANK,MUMBAI vs. THE DIT (I.T), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 3345/MUM/2004[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Oct 2022AY 1999-2000

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Blestandard Chartered Bank V. The Director Of Income-Tax (It) 3Rd Floor, Tax Department 1St Floor, Scindia House 23-25, M.G. Road, Fort N.M. Road Ballard Pier Mumbai - 400001 Mumbai - 400038 Pan: Aabcs4681D (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee Represented By : Shri P.J. Pardiwala & Shri Fenil Bhatt Department Represented By : Shri. Soumendu Kumar Dash

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S

JCIT, SPECIAL RANGE-1, NEW DELHI vs. AMERICAN EXPRESS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the Cross-objection filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 4487/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Sept 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.K.Panda & Shri Kul Bharatassessment Year : 2012-13 American Express (India) Pvt.Ltd., Vs Jcit, Metropolitan Saket, 7Th Floor, Office Special Range-I, Block, District Centre, Saket, New Delhi-110002. New Delhi-110017. Pan-Aaaca8163F Appellant Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 253Section 40