← All Phrases

“undisclosed income”

Search & SeizureSection 153ASection 153A9,092 judgments

The decision most relied on for undisclosed income is CIT v. Kabul Chawla (380 ITR 573), cited in 3,235 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on undisclosed income

CIT v. Kabul Chawla
380 ITR 573 · 2016 · High Court
3,235
citing judgments

In a search assessment under Section 153A, additions can only be made for completed or non-abated assessment years if incriminating material relevant to those years is found during the search, although notice under Section 153A(1) is mandatorily issued for six assessment years preceding the search.

CIT v. Simit P. Sheth
356 ITR 451 · 2013 · High Court
1,465
citing judgments

Additions for alleged bogus purchases should be restricted to the profit element, not the entire turnover. The profit element is often estimated at 12.5% of the purported bogus purchases.

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Harjeev Aggarwal
290 CTR 263 · 2016 · High Court
583
citing judgments

Assessment based solely on a statement recorded under Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act requires the statement to be relatable to incriminating material or evidence found during the search, especially when considering Section 158BB(1) which restricts computation of undisclosed income to evidence found during search.

CIT v. Anil Kumar Bhatia
352 ITR 493 · 2013 · High Court
537
citing judgments

Section 153A can be invoked to reassess income for all years under consideration prior to a search, even if returns for those years were processed under Section 143(1)(a). The Assessing Officer has the power to reassess total income in such cases without fetters.

CIT v. P. Mohanakala
291 ITR 278 · 2007 · Supreme Court
525
citing judgments

The Supreme Court emphasized that in the absence of concrete rebuttal by the assessee, circumstantial evidence holds significant weight, applying the doctrine of preponderance of probability, particularly when assessing undisclosed income or unexplained cash credits.

Society v. UOI
394 ITR 220 · 2017 · Supreme Court
493
citing judgments

Uncorroborated loose papers or documents found during a search operation have no evidentiary value and cannot be the sole basis for determining undisclosed income. Additions based on such material require independent evidence to establish trustworthiness and a direct link to the assessee.

CIT v. President Industries
258 ITR 654 · 2002 · High Court
471
citing judgments

When books of account are rejected and unaccounted sales or receipts are discovered, the income addition is restricted to the net profit element embedded in these undisclosed transactions, not the entire sale proceeds or receipts, especially if corresponding purchases are not proven to be outside the books.

CIT v. Gurinder Singh Bawa
386 ITR 483 · 2016 · High Court
416
citing judgments

If no incriminating material is found during a search operation regarding a particular issue, then no addition can be made concerning that issue in an assessment under section 153A of the Income-tax Act.

Judgments citing undisclosed income

Saraf the Jeweller, Chandigarh vs. The DCIT/ACIT Central Circle- 2, Chandigarh

Appeal stand dismissed

ITA 1232/CHANDI/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh12 Mar 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.1232/Chandi/2025 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2021-22) Saraf The Jeweller Dcit / Acit (Central)-2 बनाम/ Sco 45, Pocket No.1 C.R. Building Nac Showroom, Manimajra Himalaya Marg, Vs. Chandigarh – 160101 Sector-17E, Chandigarh "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Adafs-2345-B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) & 2. आयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.1594/Chandi/2025 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2021-22) Dcit / Acit (Central)-2 Saraf The Jeweller बनाम/ C.R. Building Sco 45, Pocket No.1 Himalaya Marg, Nac Showroom, Manimajra Vs. Sector-17E, Chandigarh Chandigarh – 160101 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Adafs-2345-B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) Assessee By : Sh. Sudhir Sehgal (Advocate) & Sh. Sahil Ratra (Advocate) – Ld. Ars Revenue By : Sh. Abhishek Pal Garg (Cit) & Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl. Cit) – Ld. Drs सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 12.02.2026 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement 12.03.2026 : आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal (Advocate) and Sh. Sahil RatraFor Respondent: Sh. Abhishek Pal Garg (CIT) & Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 65BSection 69C

appreciating the fact that the amount of Rs.9,57,05,100/- sale suppression during AY 2021- 22 was to be considered as undisclosed income of the assessee. 2. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the Ld. CIT(A) failed to appreciate the fact that the assessee failed ... with the customers and strike good bargains with the customers, all these objections stood rejected by Ld. AO. Finally, this amount was added as undisclosed income of the assessee. 2.4 The Ld. AO, thereafter, went on to extrapolate similar findings for the remaining units also. The addition of Rs.1570.95 Lacs

Saraf the Jeweller, Chandigarh vs. The DCIT/ACIT Central Circle -2, Chandigarh

Appeal stand dismissed

ITA 1231/CHANDI/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh12 Mar 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.1231/Chandi/2025 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2020-21) Saraf The Jeweller Dcit / Acit (Central)-2 बनाम/ Sco 45, Pocket No.1 C.R. Building Nac Showroom, Manimajra Himalaya Marg, Vs. Chandigarh – 160101 Sector-17E, Chandigarh "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Adafs-2345-B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) & 2. आयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.1593/Chandi/2025 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2020-21) Dcit / Acit (Central)-2 Saraf The Jeweller बनाम/ C.R. Building Sco 45, Pocket No.1 Himalaya Marg, Nac Showroom, Manimajra Vs. Sector-17E, Chandigarh Chandigarh – 160101 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Adafs-2345-B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/Appellant Sh. Sudhir Sehgal (Advocate) & Sh. Sahil Ratra (Advocate) – Ld. Ars By : ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Sh. Abhishek Pal Garg (Cit) & Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl. Cit) – Ld. Drs सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 12.02.2026 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement 11.03.2026 : आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench

For Respondent: Sh. Abhishek Pal Garg (CIT) & Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl. CIT) –
Section 115BSection 153A(1)(b)Section 153DSection 65BSection 68Section 69C

appreciating the fact that the amount of Rs.9,99,86,930/- sale suppression during AY 2020- 21 was to be considered as undisclosed income of the assessee. 2. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the Ld. CIT(A) failed to appreciate the fact that the assessee failed ... with the customers and strike good bargains with the customers, all these objections stood rejected by Ld. AO. Finally, this amount was added as undisclosed income of the assessee. 2.4 The Ld. AO, thereafter, went on to extrapolate similar findings for the remaining units also. The addition of Rs.1302.90 Lacs

DCIT, Central Circle 1, Rajkot vs. Buildfolio Realties LLP, Rajkot

ITA 683/RJT/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/.Ita No. 509 & 510/Rjt/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष /Assessment Year: 2021-22 & 2022-23 (Hybrid Hearing) Vs Buildfolio Realities Llp Shop No. 5Gf, Business Edifice, Canal Road 37, Karanpura Corner, Rajkot Rajkot-360005 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-1 Income Tax Office, Amruta Estate Building, Near Girnar Cinema, M G Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 स्थायीलेखासं/. जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aawfb8233C (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं/.Ita No. 683/Rjt/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year: 2021-22 (Hybrid Hearing) The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-1 Vs Buildfolio Realities Llp Shop No. 5Gf, Business Edifice, Canal Road 37, Karanpura Corner, Rajkot Rajkot-360005 Income Tax Office, Amruta Estate Building, Near Girnar Cinema, M G Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 स्थायीलेखासं/. जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aawfb8233C (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri D.M. Rindani, Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147

Ahmedabad-Trib.), evidence was unearthed about on- money received on sale of flats. The Tribunal held that what could be taxed as undisclosed income was a reasonable amount of profit earned by the assessee out of on-money but not the entire on-money. 4. Vide above show cause notice ... Kishor Mohanlal Telwala vs. ACIT (1999) 64 TTJ (Ahd) 543 the Ahmedabad Bench of the ITAT has held that what can be taxed is undisclosed income and not undisclosed receipt and the AO was not justified in making addition u/s.158BC of the total undisclosed receipt on account of "on-money

DCIT, Central Circle 1, Rajkot vs. R K Dreamland, Rajkot

ITA 564/RJT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/. Ita No. 555 To 560/Rjt/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year: 2016-17 To 2021-22 (Hybrid Hearing) M/S R K Dreamland 204, Surya Arcade, Nr. Bank Of Baroda Main Branch, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 Vs. The Dcit, Cc-1 Aaykar Bhawan, Amruta Estate, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 स्थायीलेखासं/. जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aarfr4023P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं/. Ita No. 563 & 564/Rjt/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year: 2016-17 To 2017-18 The Dcit, Cc-1 Aaykar Bhawan, Amruta Estate, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 Vs. M/S R K Dreamland 204, Surya Arcade, Nr. Bank Of Baroda Main Branch, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 स्थायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aarfr4023P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) निर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.Ar राजस्व की ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16/01/2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 11/03/2026 Order Per, Bench: Captioned Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue, Pertaining To

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

only from the illegal business but also the unaccounted transaction of purchase and sale only profit/ income on sales could be assessed as undisclosed income and could be subjected to tax. Case laws to the point are as under: 1. Dr. T.A. Quereshi (157 taxmann.com 514) (Supreme Court) 2. Piara ... assessment order, then simply that name & address of purchasers are not provided the entire amount of sale cannot in law be treated as undisclosed income, only profit earned from said transactions which has been admitted by assessee at Rs.45,00,000/- can only be assessed to tax more so when

DCIT, Central Circle 1, Rajkot vs. R K Dreamland, Rajkot

ITA 563/RJT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/. Ita No. 555 To 560/Rjt/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year: 2016-17 To 2021-22 (Hybrid Hearing) M/S R K Dreamland Vs. The Dcit, Cc-1 204, Surya Arcade, Nr. Bank Of Baroda Main Branch, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 Aaykar Bhawan, Amruta Estate, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 स्थायीलेखासं/. जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aarfr4023P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं/. Ita No. 563 & 564/Rjt/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year: 2016-17 To 2017-18 The Dcit, Cc-1 Vs. M/S R K Dreamland Aaykar Bhawan, Amruta Estate, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 204, Surya Arcade, Nr. Bank Of Baroda Main Branch, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 स्थायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aarfr4023P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) निर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee By राजस्व की ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.Ar : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16/01/2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 11/03/2026 Order Per, Bench: Captioned Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue, Pertaining To

For Respondent: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.AR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

only from the illegal business but also the unaccounted transaction of purchase and sale only profit/ income on sales could be assessed as undisclosed income and could be subjected to tax. Case laws to the point are as under: 1. Dr. T.A. Quereshi (157 taxmann.com 514) (Supreme Court) 2. Piara ... assessment order, then simply that name & address of purchasers are not provided the entire amount of sale cannot in law be treated as undisclosed income, only profit earned from said transactions which has been admitted by assessee at Rs.45,00,000/- can only be assessed to tax more so when

R K Dreamland, Rajkot vs. DCIT, CC-1, Rajkot

ITA 560/RJT/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/. Ita No. 555 To 560/Rjt/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year: 2016-17 To 2021-22 (Hybrid Hearing) Vs. The Dcit, Cc-1 Aaykar Bhawan, Amruta Estate, M G Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 M/S R K Dreamland 204, Surya Arcade, Nr. Bank Of Baroda Main Branch, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) स्थायीलेखासं/. जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aarfr4023P आयकर अपील सं/. Ita No. 563 & 564/Rjt/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year: 2016-17 To 2017-18 The Dcit, Cc-1 Aaykar Bhawan, Amruta Estate, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 Vs. M/S R K Dreamland 204, Surya Arcade, Nr. Bank Of Baroda Main Branch, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) स्थायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aarfr4023P निर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.Ar राजस्व की ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16/01/2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 11/03/2026 Order Per, Bench: Captioned Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue, Pertaining To

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

only from the illegal business but also the unaccounted transaction of purchase and sale only profit/ income on sales could be assessed as undisclosed income and could be subjected to tax. Case laws to the point are as under: 1. Dr. T.A. Quereshi (157 taxmann.com 514) (Supreme Court) 2. Piara ... assessment order, then simply that name & address of purchasers are not provided the entire amount of sale cannot in law be treated as undisclosed income, only profit earned from said transactions which has been admitted by assessee at Rs.45,00,000/- can only be assessed to tax more so when

Rk Dreamland, Rajkot vs. ACIT, CC-1, Rajkot

ITA 556/RJT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/. Ita No. 555 To 560/Rjt/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year: 2016-17 To 2021-22 (Hybrid Hearing) M/S R K Dreamland 204, Surya Arcade, Nr. Bank Of Baroda Main Branch, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 Vs. The Dcit, Cc-1 Aaykar Bhawan, Amruta Estate, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 स्थायीलेखासं/. जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aarfr4023P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं/. Ita No. 563 & 564/Rjt/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year: 2016-17 To 2017-18 The Dcit, Cc-1 Aaykar Bhawan, Amruta Estate, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 Vs. M/S R K Dreamland 204, Surya Arcade, Nr. Bank Of Baroda Main Branch, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 स्थायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aarfr4023P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) निर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee By राजस्व की ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.Ar : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16/01/2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 11/03/2026 Order Per, Bench: Captioned Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue, Pertaining To

For Respondent: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.AR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

only from the illegal business but also the unaccounted transaction of purchase and sale only profit/ income on sales could be assessed as undisclosed income and could be subjected to tax. Case laws to the point are as under: 1. Dr. T.A. Quereshi (157 taxmann.com 514) (Supreme Court) 2. Piara ... assessment order, then simply that name & address of purchasers are not provided the entire amount of sale cannot in law be treated as undisclosed income, only profit earned from said transactions which has been admitted by assessee at Rs.45,00,000/- can only be assessed to tax more so when

R K Dreamland, Rajkot vs. ACIT, CC-1, Rajkot, Rajokt

ITA 555/RJT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/. Ita No. 555 To 560/Rjt/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year: 2016-17 To 2021-22 (Hybrid Hearing) Vs. The Dcit, Cc-1 Aaykar Bhawan, Amruta Estate, M G Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 M/S R K Dreamland 204, Surya Arcade, Nr. Bank Of Baroda Main Branch, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) स्थायीलेखासं/. जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aarfr4023P आयकर अपील सं/. Ita No. 563 & 564/Rjt/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year: 2016-17 To 2017-18 Vs. M/S R K Dreamland The Dcit, Cc-1 Aaykar Bhawan, Amruta Estate, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 204, Surya Arcade, Nr. Bank Of Baroda Main Branch, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) स्थायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aarfr4023P निर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee By राजस्व की ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.Ar : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16/01/2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 11/03/2026 Order Per, Bench: Captioned Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue, Pertaining To

For Respondent: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.AR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

only from the illegal business but also the unaccounted transaction of purchase and sale only profit/ income on sales could be assessed as undisclosed income and could be subjected to tax. Case laws to the point are as under: 1. Dr. T.A. Quereshi (157 taxmann.com 514) (Supreme Court) 2. Piara ... assessment order, then simply that name & address of purchasers are not provided the entire amount of sale cannot in law be treated as undisclosed income, only profit earned from said transactions which has been admitted by assessee at Rs.45,00,000/- can only be assessed to tax more so when