SIX TWENTY REALTY PVT. LTD.,RAJKOT vs. DCIT, CC-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that unaccounted profit from 'on-money' receipts should be taxed in the year the sale deed is executed, not when the 'on-money' was received. It also noted that ICDS-III was not applicable to the assessee.
What were the facts?
During a survey, the assessee, a real estate developer, was found to have unaccounted cash receipts and payments, primarily from 'on-money' received on sale of flats. The Assessing Officer reopened the case and made additions based on this.
What were the issues?
The primary issues were the validity of proceedings initiated under Section 147/148 and the year in which 'on-money' receipts should be taxed for a real estate developer.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 133A,Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 148,Section 148A,Section 151,Section 145
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(12)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. S C Kothari111 citing82 ITR 794 · 1971 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Piara Singh95 citing124 ITR 40 · 1980 · SC · Read judgment
- 157 Taxmann.com 51461 citing157 Taxmann.com 514
- CIT v. Shivalik Buildwell P Ltd.44 citing40 Taxmann.com 219 · 2013 · HC
- CIT v. Happy Home Corporation42 citing94 Taxmann.com 292 · 2018 · HC · Read judgment
- Jay Builder v. ACIT36 citing215 Taxmann 50 · 2013 · HC
- D.N. Kamani (HUF) v. DCIT34 citing70 ITD 77 · 1999 · ITAT
- Abhishek Corporation v. DCIT23 citing63 TTJ 651 · 1999 · ITAT
- N.R. Paper & Boards Ltd. v. Dy. CIT22 citing234 ITR 733 · 1998 · HC
- CIT v. Dolphin Builders (P) Ltd.14 citing356 ITR 420 · 2013 · HC
- CIT v. Dolphin Builders pvt. Ltd.8 citing63 DTR 145
- DCIT v. Adarsh Industrial Estate\nPvt. Ltd.5 citing190 ITD 878 · 2021 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI & DR. DINESH MOHAN SINHA
Per, Bench: Captioned appeals filed by the Assessee and Revenue, pertaining to Asse
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 133A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ranchhodbhai Kurjibhai Kakadiya, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 553/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Amr Infrastructures, Hyderabad vs DCIT., Central Circle-2(1), HyderabadITA 818/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Vikaskumar Macwan, Nadiad vs Dc/ACIT Central Circle 3, VadodaraITA 2022/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026