← All Phrases

“Section 141(1)”

Section References (mined)Section 141Section 141(1)21 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 141(1) is 279 ITR 331/149 Taxman 15 (Guj.); 5. CIT v. Sabari Enterprises (298 ITR 141), cited in 706 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 141(1)

279 ITR 331/149 Taxman 15 (Guj.); 5. CIT v. Sabari Enterprises
298 ITR 141 · 2008 · High Court
706
citing judgments

Employee contributions to provident fund or ESI, even if deposited after the due date specified in the respective welfare statutes, are allowable as a deduction under Section 36(1)(va) if paid before the due date for filing the income-tax return. This judgment aligns the treatment of employee contributions with employer contributions under Section 43B.

Bombay in CIT v. Ghatge Patil Transports Ltd.
53 Taxmann.com 141 · 2015 · High Court
160
citing judgments

The Bombay High Court holds that employees' contributions to provident fund and ESIC, though paid beyond the due dates specified in the respective welfare legislations, are allowable as a deduction under section 36(1)(va) if they are paid before the due date for furnishing the return of income under section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act.

Aztec Software & Technologies Services Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT
107 ITD 141 · 2007 · ITAT
90
citing judgments

OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines can be referred to for resolving transfer pricing disputes in India, even though India is not an OECD member, provided they are consistent with Indian statutory regulations. Availability of exemption under Section 10A does not bar the applicability of Section 92C and 92CA.

Asstt. CIT v. Pratibha Industries Ltd.
141 ITD 151 · 2013 · ITAT
64
citing judgments

Where an assessee invests its own funds in an infrastructure development project, it is presumed to be acting as a developer, not merely a contractor, making it eligible for deduction under section 80-IA(4).

CIT v. Smt. Prabhabati Bansali
141 ITR 419 · 1983 · High Court
36
citing judgments

The annual value of a house property for income tax purposes is to be determined based on the higher of the actual rent received or the annual value determined by the municipal/local authority, provided the municipal assessment is contemporaneous and reflects the true annual value. In cases where the property is self-occupied or not actually let, the municipal valuation serves as a reasonable guide for determining the annual letting value.

Sundaram Multi Pap Ltd. v. ACIT
164 Taxmann.com 414 · 2024 · High Court
31
citing judgments

An order passed under Section 148A(d) and subsequent proceedings are void if the Assessing Officer provides insufficient opportunity for the assessee to file a reply before issuing the notice under Section 148A(b).

CIT v. Madras Radiators and Pressings Ltd.
264 ITR 620 · 2003 · High Court
29
citing judgments

The term 'every month' in the Provident Fund Scheme refers to the month in which wages were actually earned and salary became payable, not the month in which the salary was paid. An employer's responsibility to deposit contributions is independent of the timing of salary payments.

Fluid Air (India) Ltd. v. DCIT
63 ITD 182 · 1997 · ITAT
23
citing judgments

Section 43B and Section 36(1)(va) of the Income-tax Act should be interpreted liberally, with any ambiguity regarding the due dates for employee contribution payments to provident fund being resolved in favour of the assessee. Deductions should be allowed for payments made within the previous year, even if there is a slight delay.

Judgments citing Section 141(1)

Section 141(1) — 21 case laws | BharatTax