Vegesina Komala v. ITO, Palakol
66 Taxmann.com 280Reported decision2016#10707 most cited
What is Vegesina Komala v. ITO, Palakol authority for?
An inadequate inquiry by the Assessing Officer (AO) does not automatically render an order erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue for the purpose of revision under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. Lack of inquiry, however, can be a valid ground for revision.
10
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2023.
Also referred to as
Vegesina Komala v. ITO · Section 263 · Revisionary powers · Pr. CIT · erroneous order · prejudicial to revenue · inadequate enquiry · lack of enquiry · assessment order · CIT v. Rameshwari Devi