United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors. v. Patricia Jean Mahajan and Ors.

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-6 vs. M/s. Chillara Kalyan

The appeals are disposed of accordingly along with

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

…pendent beneficiaries reside. Two of the dependants, namely, parents aged 69/73 years live in India, but four of them are in the United States. Shri Soli J. Sorabjee submitted that the 8 (2009) 6 SCC 121 9 (2002) 6 SCC 281 Digitally Signed By:PRAMOD KUMAR VATS Signing Date:02.04.2024 21:07:20 Signature Not Verified MAC.APPL. 265/2019 & 351/2019 Page 14 of 26 amount of multiplicand shall surely be relevant and in case it is a high amount, a lower multiplier can appropriately be appli…

THEE COMMISSISONER OF INCOME TAX-IV vs. M/S.NMDC LTD

Bench: T.MADHAVI DEVI,UJJAL BHUYAN

…1,25,000/-. B. LOSS OF INCOME AND FUTURE INCOME 14. As far as loss of income for the period of treatment is concerned, the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs. 43,000/- to the claimant, relying upon his 1 MAC.APP. 352/2006, decided on 26.10.2009. 2 (2002) 6 SCC 281. Signed By:SOMYA SATIJA Signing Date:21.11.2025 18:39:37 Signature Not Verified MAC.APP. 966/2015 & MAC.APP. 395/2016 Page 5 of 8 income tax return for the year 2010-11, which showed an annual income of Rs. 1,71,887/-. The Tribunal accepted that in view of the nature of injuries suffered by the…

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HYD vs. M/S. SREE NAGENDRA CONSTRUCTIONS, KHAMMAM

The appeal is disposed of in the above terms

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

…sent MAC.APP. 472/2016 & 316/2017 Page 6 of 13 case. However, this argument is no longer valid in view of the dicta of the Supreme Court in United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors. vs. Patricia Jean Mahajan and Ors., (2002) 6 SCC 281. Extent of Functional Disability: 11. The insurer further contends that 80% permanent physical disability of the claimant had never been established and his functional disability also remains undetermined. The Court would note that the PW-6, Dr. Sunil Tuli, the Consultant Orthopedic at Orthonova Hospital, New Delhi, had deposed that the…

The Commissioner of Income Tax -I, vs. M/s. Bhagyanagar Studios

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

…d after accounting only for the 50% personal expense deduction on the net figure, aligning with the evidence and precedents such as Sarla Verma v. Delhi Transport Corporation (2009) 6 SCC 121 and United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Patricia Jean Mahajan (2002) 6 SCC 281. There is no apparent error in the final computation that warrants modification, as the effective contribution to the family was appropriately assessed without redundant tax SAURAV PATHANIA 2025.10.29 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RA-CR-133-CII-2016(O&M) 4 adjustment. Therefore, the gri…

SMT.K. SOWBAGHYA vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: ANAND BYRAREDDY

…1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016 BEFORE: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY WRIT PETITION No.14649 OF 2014 (GM-RES) CONNECTED WITH WRIT PETITION No.19732 OF 2014 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: Smt. K. Sowbaghya, Wife of Sri. Katta Subramanya Naidu, Age: 58 years, Resident of No.9, 6th “A” Cross, Sadashivanagara, Bangalore 560 094. …PETITIONER COMMON (By Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate for Shri Kiran S Javali and Shri Chandrashekara .K, Advocates) AND: 1. Union of India, Ministry of F…

SMT.K.SOWBAGHYA vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: ANAND BYRAREDDY

…1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016 BEFORE: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY WRIT PETITION No.14649 OF 2014 (GM-RES) CONNECTED WITH WRIT PETITION No.19732 OF 2014 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: Smt. K. Sowbaghya, Wife of Sri. Katta Subramanya Naidu, Age: 58 years, Resident of No.9, 6th “A” Cross, Sadashivanagara, Bangalore 560 094. …PETITIONER COMMON (By Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate for Shri Kiran S Javali and Shri Chandrashekara .K, Advocates) AND: 1. Union of India, Ministry of F…

The Commissioner of Income-Tax (central) vs. Himagiri Green Fields Pvt Ltd.,

…MAC APP Nos. 491 & 492/2013 Page 1 of 12 $~23 & 24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Decided on: 14.01.2021 + MAC.APP. 491/2013 & CM APPL. 13731/2020 MS BERSHADSKA TETYANA & ORS .... Appellants versus MR SURENDER SINGH & ORS ....Respondents + MAC.APP. 492/2013 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD (INSURER) .... Appellant versus MS BERSHADSKA TETYANA & ORS. ....Respondents Through: Ms. Neha Garg, Mr. Nitin Garg and Mr. Mahender Yadav, Advocates for claimants. Mr. Devansh Gu…