Vittal Grameena Sahakari Bank Niyamitha, Vittal vs. Income-Tax Officer, Ward-2(5), Mangaluru
ITA 895/BANG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Feb 2024AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Chandra Poojariassessment Year: 2017-18 Vittal Grameena Sahakari Bank Niyamitha F.F. 94, Palace Road Vittal Bantwal Taluk Ito Vs. Vittal 574 222 Ward-2(5) Karnataka Mangaluru Pan No.Aaava1252A Assessee Respondent Assessee By : Ms. Harsha J., A.R. Revenue By : Shri Parithivel, D.R. Date Of Hearing : 06.02.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 06.02.2024 O R D E R Per Chandra Poojari: This Appeal By Assessee Is Directed Against Order Of Nfac For The Assessment Year 2017-18 Dated 12.9.2023 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short “The Act”). The Assessee Has Raised Following Grounds Of Appeal: 1. “The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Passed Under Section 250 Of The Act Is Opposed To Law, Equity, Weight Of Evidence, Probabilities & The Facts & Circumstances In The Appellant'S Case. 2. The Appellant Denies To Be Assessed To Tax On Total Income As Determined By The Learr.Ad Ao Of Rs. 2,52,38,729/- As Against The Total Income Reported By The Appellant Of Rs. Nil On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case.
For Appellant: Ms. Harsha J., A.RFor Respondent: Shri Parithivel, D.R
Section 250Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)
…ITA No.895/Bang/2023 Vittal Grameena Sahakari Bank Niyamitha, Vittal IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K., VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2017-18 Vittal Grameena Sahakari Bank Niyamitha F.F. 94, Palace Road Vittal Bantwal Taluk ITO Vs. Vittal 574 222 Ward-2(5) Karnataka Mangaluru PAN NO.AAAVA1252A ASSESSEE RESPONDENT Assessee by : Ms. Harsha J., A.R. Revenue by : Shri Parithivel, D.R. Date of Hearing : 06.02.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 06.02.2024 O R D E R PER CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: This appeal by asse…