SHREE CHANNAMALESHWARA CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,,KALABURAGI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3 , KALABURAGI

The Ld.DR relied on the order of the Ld.CIT(A) and he submitted that the interest income received by the assessee is not to be considered as a business income since the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court of Karnataka has settled this issue in the case of Totgars’ Co- operative Sales Society Ltd. reported in (2017) 395 ITR 611 (Karnataka) dated 16.06.2017. He also submitted that the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Katlary Kariyana Merchant Sahkari Sarafi Mandali Ltd. reported in (2022) 140 taxmann.com 602 (Gujarat) dated 04.01.2022 on similar facts had decided the issue in favour of the revenue.

He also submitted that the status of the payer of interest also should be seen whether it is co-operative bank or co-operative society. He relied on the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Kerala State Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank Ltd. (KSCARDB) vs. The Assessing Officer, Trivandrum & Ors. reported in (2023) 154 taxmann.com 305 (Supreme Court). He further submitted that the interest received from Co-operative bank is also not eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act because it was received from the co-operative bank which is carrying banking business of banking.

Considering the rival submissions, we note that here the issue is that whether the assessee is eligible to claim of deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) or 80P(2)(d) on the interest income earned on its investments amount made with co-operative banks. The Ld.CIT(A) has not accepted the claim of the assessee by relying on the judgment of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in case of Totgars’ Co-operative Sales Society Ltd. (supra) and Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in case of Katlary Kariyana Merchant Sahkari Sarafi Mandali Ltd. (supra). During the course of hearing, the Ld.AR of the assessee relied on the Circular No. 18/2015 dated 02.11.2015 and submitted that as per the provisions of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, the assessee is required to maintain SLR from the deposits received from the members and has to invest 100% from the general reserve and 25% from the deposits collected from members. Accordingly, assessee has invested in the fixed deposits. As per the circular, the income received from the investments should be treated as business income u/s. 28 and assessee is eligible to make a claim of deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) as business income. Further, the assessee submitted that the investments were made in co-operative banks which are co-operative society. Therefore the interest received on such investments are to be allowed for deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d). In support of his argument, the assessee relied on the following decisions.

We note from plain reading of Circular No. 18/2015 dated 02.11.2015 it is applicable to the banks. As per our considered opinion, this circular is applicable to those co-operative societies / co- operative banks in which the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 applies. During the course of hearing the assessee was asked to submit the requirement of SLR as per Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act and the quantum and period for calculating SLR, the assessee was unable to give reply. Accordingly the assessee is directed to submit the details of SLR requirement before the AO. We further make it clear that if the maintainability of SLR requirement is out of reserve fund then no deduction shall be allowed u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i). Since the interest income received on such investments from co-operative banks is not attributable to main business of the appellant, hence needs to be assessed as ‘income from other source”. The issue regarding the word “attributable” has been discussed elaborately by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of M/s Totgar’s Co-operative Sales Society (2010) reported in [2010] 188 Taxman 282 (SC) where it is held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court that the deduction u/s 80P is available only to the income which is attributable to the business operation. Since the interest income received by the appellant was not attributable to the main business of the appellant the same should not be allowed as deduction u/s 80P of the Act. The AO is further directed that while adjudicating this issue, the provisions of Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, Chapter VII section 57 and 58 is to be considered too.

We note from the submissions of the ld. AR that the assessee has invested in various commercial banks as well as in co-operative banks and earned interest thereon. Section 80P(2)(d) describes that if the assessee has received interest from the co-operative society, then the assessee is eligible for claim of deduction on such interest. However we note that the assessee has received interest from co-operative banks but it is not clear whether the interest payer is a bank and registered with Reserve Bank of India and holding licence from RBI for carrying out banking business as per RBI Act. In addition, in the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Kerala State Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank Ltd. KSCARDB vs. The Assessing Officer, Trivandrum & Ors. (2023) 154 taxmann.com 305 (Supreme Court) it has been discussed in detail the definition of co- operative banks and co-operative society. If the payer bank falls under the definition of co-operative bank in the light of the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court then the assessee is not eligible to get deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) on such interest income received from co-operative banks, therefore this issue is also remitted back to the Ld.AO.

We further note that the assessee has received interest from other co-operative banks/commercial banks on its investments. In this regard, the Ld.CIT(A) has not given benefit of deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) as per the judgment of the Jurisdictional High Court reported in 395 ITR 611 and Hon’ble Gujarat High Court (supra). The revenue authorities have considered the entire interest as income from other sources u/s. 56 and no cost of expenses u/s. 57 has been allowed to the assessee. While calculating the income, the net income should be considered as taxable income after reducing the expenditure incurred towards earning of such income. Therefore relying on the judgment of Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court in case of Totgars’ Co-operative Sales Society Ltd. vs ITO Sirsi, reported in (2015) 58 taxmann.com 35 (Karnataka), the assessee is eligible for claim of its cost of funds on the entire interest income. Reliance is also placed on the judgment of Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in case of The West Coast Paper Mill Employees Souhardha Credit Co-op. Ltd. Accordingly, the assessee is directed to provide the details of cost of funds before the assessing officer. Therefore for allowing cost of funds, we are remitting this issue to the assessing officer for determining the cost of funds for earning interest income.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.