Ambey Laboratories Limited, Delhi vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 2334/DEL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri S.Rifaur Rahmanambey Laboratories Limited, Vs. Acit, Circle 2(2), Ground Floor, Property No.555, Delhi. Tarla Mohalla Ghitorni, Delhi – 110 030. (Pan : Aaaca4317R) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Ms. Apoorva Bhardwaj, Ca Revenue By : Shri Ashish Tripathi, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 24.04.2025 Date Of Order : 27.06.2025 O R D E R Per S.Rifaur Rahman: 1. This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Ld. Cit (A)] Dated 31.01.2024 For Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are, Assessee Filed Its Return Of Income On 04.11.2017 Declaring Loss Of Rs.15,30,39,,439/-. The Case Was Selected For Scrutiny Under Cass & Notices Under Section 143(2) & 142(1) Of The Income-Tax
For Appellant: Ms. Apoorva Bhardwaj, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Tripathi, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(2)Section 68
…& Loss Account [PB No. 61-78, relevant at PB No. 77]. 3. Section 36(1 )(vii) of the Act provides that any bad debt written off in the books of account as irrecoverable is an allowable deduction. It has been settled by the Apex Court in TRF Ltd. v. CIT [2010] 323 ITR 397 that writing off of debt in the books of account is the only condition for claiming deduction of bad debt under section 36(1 )(vii) of the Act and it is not necessary for the assessee to establish that the debt become irrecoverable for allowance of deduction. "4. This position in law is well-settled. After 1-4-1989. it is not necessary for the as…