Landmark Cases on Charitable Trusts and Exemptions

309 decisions, ranked by how many judgments on BharatTax rely on them.

Chandraprabhuji Maharaj Jain v. DCIT
110 Taxmann.com 11 · 2019 · High Court
25
citing judgments

Filing Form No. 10 for accumulation of income under section 11(2) beyond the due date does not disentitle a trust from claiming exemption under section 11, and the Assessing Officer should examine the admissibility of the benefit rather than disallowing it on technicalities.

Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board v. ADIT(E)
121 Taxmann.com 88 · 2020 · High Court
25
citing judgments

When an assessee is engaged in charitable activity for the advancement of objects of general public utility, the proviso to Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, will not be applicable.

CIT v. Sunil J. Kinariwala
259 ITR 10 · 2003 · Supreme Court
25
citing judgments

Income that is passed on to a third party after receipt, in discharge of an obligation, is considered an application of income, not a diversion of income.

Goyal v. DCIT
269 ITR 59 · 2004 · High Court
25
citing judgments

Grant of exemption or renewal for charitable trusts is not automatic and requires verification of the genuineness of their activities. The assessing officer must be satisfied with the objects and activities of the trust before granting or renewing exemptions.

Sarafa Association v. CIT
294 ITR 262 · 2007 · High Court
25
citing judgments

The promotion of commercial trade is considered a charitable purpose under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act.

Ms. Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
3 SCC 666 · 1992 · Reported
25
citing judgments

Collecting fees beyond the prescribed government rate for education is illegal and constitutes the sale of education, which is contrary to the constitutional scheme and Indian culture.

CIT v. Common Effluent Treatment Plant (Thane Belapur) Association
328 ITR 362 · 2010 · High Court
25
citing judgments

Interest earned by an association from surplus funds deposited with non-members is taxable and does not fall under the principle of mutuality.

CIT v. Queen Educational Society
177 Taxmann 326 · 2009 · High Court
25
citing judgments

Activities of imparting education with a primary object of earning profit are not considered charitable activities. Therefore, such entities may not be eligible for registration under section 12AA or exemptions under section 10(23C).

Upper Ganges Sugar Mills Ltd. v. CIT
93 Taxmann 645 · 1997 · Supreme Court
25
citing judgments

An institution or fund is deemed to be one to which section 80G applies even if it incurs expenditure of a religious nature not exceeding five per cent. of its total income, overriding Explanation 3 to section 80G(5)(ii).

Commissioner of Income Tax-ll v. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti
12 SCC 267 · 2012 · Reported
24
citing judgments

An authority's activities do not lose their charitable character merely because some profit arises from the activity, provided the predominant object is to carry out a charitable purpose and not to earn profit. Surplus funds generated are to be used for the established charitable objects.

DIT (Exemption) v. Girdharilal Shewnarain Tantia Trust
199 ITR 215 · 1993 · High Court
24
citing judgments

The real income of a trust, not deemed income, is to be considered for accumulation. Deductions allowable in a normal commercial manner should be applied before determining the income to be excluded.

Allahabad Young Men’s Christian Association v. CCIT & Ors.
371 ITR 23 · 2015 · High Court
24
citing judgments

Expenditure cannot be disallowed under Section 14A read with Rule 8D when an assessee has not earned any exempt income during the year. Disallowance is inappropriate if there is no exempt income attributable to the assessee.

Lodging Association vs. CBDT (301 ITR 86) (SC) 2) Queen’s Educational Society v. CIT (
385 ITR 66 · 2016 · Supreme Court
24
citing judgments

The mere fact that an institution generates a surplus of income over expenditure does not automatically mean it is run for profit. Educational institutions often require some surplus to cover expenses and carry on their activities.

CTT v. DSM Group of Industries
4 SCC 272 · 2005 · Reported
24
citing judgments

When interpreting an exemption notification under a fiscal statute, the principle that an obscure provision should be construed in favour of the assessee does not apply. Instead, exemption notifications must be interpreted strictly, and the burden of proving their applicability rests solely on the assessee.

Indore). (iv) Improvement Trust v. CIT, Bhatirda
41 Taxmann.com 403 · 2014 · Reported
24
citing judgments

The activities of an assessee can be regarded as charitable in nature, entitling them to the benefits of Section 11 of the Act, provided the facts and circumstances are identical to prior tribunal decisions.

CIT v. Doon Foundation
154 ITR 208 · 1985 · High Court
24
citing judgments

An educational institution is eligible for exemption under Section 10(22) if its income is derived from an institution existing solely for educational purposes and not for profit. Affiliation with a university or board is not a prerequisite for such exemption.

L&T Finance Ltd. v. DCIT
167 Taxmann.com 503 · 2024 · ITAT
24
citing judgments

Contributions made by a company for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) to a registered charitable institution can be treated as akin to corpus donations, potentially allowing for deduction under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, provided other conditions are met.

CIT v. Spring Dale Educational Society
16 Taxmann.com 285 · 2011 · High Court
24
citing judgments

When considering an application for registration under section 12AA, the Commissioner should only verify the genuineness of the trust's activities and aims, not the manner in which its funds are applied at this stage.

CIT v. Kamalini Khatau
209 ITR 101 · 1994 · Supreme Court
24
citing judgments

Income received by a beneficiary from a trust takes the colour of the trust's income. If the trust distributes capital, it is not income in the hands of the beneficiary.

Nirmal Agricultural Society v. ITO
71 ITD 152 · 1999 · ITAT
24
citing judgments

Corpus collections received by an assessee, which are treated as income by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals), are required to be deleted.

Alubound Dacs India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT
163 Taxmann.com 536 · 2024 · ITAT
24
citing judgments

Expenditure on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities is an allowable deduction under section 80G of the Income Tax Act, provided the conditions stipulated in section 80G are met, irrespective of being part of CSR expenditure.

CIT (Exemption) v. Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purshottam Public Charitable Trust
102 Taxmann.com 122 · 2019 · High Court
24
citing judgments

A lack of specific declaration regarding the purpose of accumulated funds in Form No. 10 does not invalidate an exemption claim under Section 11(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Supreme Court has upheld this position by dismissing the Department's SLP.

CIT v. Palghat Shadi Mahal Trust
254 ITR 212 · 2002 · Supreme Court
24
citing judgments

A charitable trust established for the benefit of a specific community is disqualified from exemption under section 11 if it extends benefits to other communities, as this violates the provisions of section 13(1)(b).

CIT v. Sree Narayana Chandrika Trust
212 ITR 456 · 1995 · High Court
23
citing judgments

The High Court decision in CIT v. Sree Narayana Chandrika Trust (1995) 212 ITR 456 (Ker) is cited in support of the proposition that a trust may not be eligible for exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad) if it derives income from business activities, such as running a theatre.

CIT v. Shree Krishna Bandar Trust
247 ITR 1 · 2001 · High Court
23
citing judgments

A trust cannot be regarded as an Association of Persons (AOP) for income tax purposes if it is a valid trust.

Assessing Officer. 75. In Sanjeevamma Hanumanthe Gowda Charitable Trust v. Director of Income Tax (Exemption)
285 ITR 327 · 2006 · High Court
23
citing judgments

Authorities must consider both the objects and activities of a trust when deciding on registration under Section 12A, and registration cannot be refused solely because charitable activities haven't been conducted yet if the objects are charitable.

CIT v. Pentasoft Technologies Ltd.
347 ITR 578 · 2012 · High Court
23
citing judgments

The exclusion of income derived from the export of computer software under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is permissible even if the business of exporting software was acquired by the assessee.

CIT (E) v. Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority
395 ITR 18 · 2017 · High Court
23
citing judgments

Government bodies are not entitled to exemption if their activities are motivated by profit. The decisive test for 'commercial activity' under section 10(46) is whether the activities for which consideration is collected are intrinsically associated with the object for which the body was set up.

CIT v. Programme for Community Organization
116 Taxmann 608 · 2001 · Supreme Court
23
citing judgments

A charitable or religious trust is entitled to accumulate twenty-five per cent of the income derived from property held under the trust. Donations received by the assessee constitute its property for the purpose of calculating this accumulation.

CIT v. Jodhpur Development Authority
79 Taxmann.com 361 · 2017 · High Court
23
citing judgments

Activities carried out by development authorities are for a charitable purpose under Section 2(15) and therefore qualify for exemption or deduction under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, as they are not in the nature of trade, commerce, or business.

3 SCC 346) and American Hotel & Lodging Association, Educational Institute v. CBDT
10 SCC 509 · 2008 · Reported
22
citing judgments

Educational institutions exist solely for educational purposes, not for profit, when any surplus generated is ploughed back for educational purposes. The predominant object test cannot be applied to educational institutions if they are permitted to record profits and gains of business.

249 ITR 533 (Bom) and CIT(E) v. Audyogik
101 Taxmann.com 247 · 2019 · High Court
22
citing judgments

Denial of exemption under Section 11 to a charitable trust should be limited to the extent of funds diverted or utilized in violation of Section 13(2)(b) read with Section 13(3) of the Income Tax Act, and not the entire exemption or cancellation of registration.

Jhansi Development Authority v. DCIT
123 Taxmann.com 247 · 2021 · ITAT
22
citing judgments

Development authorities, by drawing parallels with other such authorities whose High Courts have ruled in their favour, can demonstrate that their activities do not constitute business or undertaking the same for profit, thereby maintaining their charitable status under Section 2(15). This principle is supported by the favourable decisions of various High Courts concerning similar entities.

Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi v. Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industries, New Delhi
130 ITR 186 · 1981 · Supreme Court
22
citing judgments

Activities are not considered to be for profit if their dominant purpose is the promotion, protection, and development of trade, commerce, and industry, even if they involve income-generating activities like conducting trade fairs or collecting fees.

Shree Jain Swetamber Murtipujak Tapagachha Sangh v. CIT (Exemptions)
161 Taxmann.com 114 · 2024 · High Court
22
citing judgments

Delay in filing Form No. 10 beyond the due date is condonable if the delay is not intentional and arises from a bona fide oversight by the assessee's professional, preventing the assessee from being prejudiced due to such ignorance.

InterGlobe Technology Quotient P Ltd. v. ACIT
163 Taxmann.com 542 · 2024 · High Court
22
citing judgments

Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenditure does not automatically justify its disallowance under Section 80G of the Income-tax Act, provided other conditions for the deduction are met. CSR expenses are not eligible for deduction as business expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Act.

CIT (Exemption) v. Anjana Foundation
168 Taxmann.com 462 · 2024 · High Court
22
citing judgments

A charitable trust is entitled to claim exemption under Section 11 even if Form 10B is filed at a later stage, as the filing of this form is a procedural requirement and not a condition precedent for claiming exemption.

CIT v. Strawboard Manufacturing Company Limited
177 ITR 431 · 1989 · Supreme Court
22
citing judgments

Provisions in a taxing statute that provide for concessional rates of tax to encourage industrial activity should be construed liberally.

Kar.) 2. DIT(E) vs. Sheth Mafatlal Gagalbhai Foundation Trust (249 ITR 533) (Bom.) 3. CIT v. Red Rose School (
224 ITR 358 · High Court
22
citing judgments

Income received by a trust that is considered 'extra fees' is taxable at the maximum marginal rate, while other income of the trust is eligible for exemption under Section 11.

Gujarati Charitable Foundation Poona (2018) 402 ITR 441(SC) 4. CIT v. Sardarilal& Co.
266 CTR 181 · 2014 · Reported
22
citing judgments

Exemption under Section 11 of the Income-tax Act can be denied if trustees manage the trust's financial affairs as their personal business, particularly by collecting excess fees from students.

ITO v. Gujarat Information Technology Fund
45 SOT 529 · 2011 · ITAT
22
citing judgments

The case is cited as authority for exemption under Section 10(23FB) of the Income Tax Act.

PTC India Ltd. v. DCIT: ITA Nos. 580 and 581 (Del) 2009 (Del)
52 SOT 39 · 2012 · ITAT
22
citing judgments

Before invoking Section 14A read with Rule 8D, the Assessing Officer must examine the assessee's voluntary disallowance or non-disallowance of expenditure related to exempt income. The AO cannot automatically apply Rule 8D without being satisfied that the assessee's claim is incorrect.

Rajasthan Cricket Association v. Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-2(3), Jaipur
164 ITD 212 · 2017 · ITAT
22
citing judgments

An organization's primary activity of conducting cricket matches, which is for the advancement of a general public utility, will not disqualify it from charitable status under section 2(15) merely because it derives ancillary income from sources like TV subsidies or match receipts.

Araadhya Jain Trust v. ITO
173 Taxmann.com 343 · 2025 · ITAT
22
citing judgments

The definition of maximum marginal rate under section 2(29C) can be interpreted to determine the applicable surcharge rates, particularly for income including dividends, as per the First Schedule to the Finance Act. This affects how surcharge is calculated on taxable income.

New Noble Educational Society v. Chief CIT
334 ITR 303 · 2011 · High Court
22
citing judgments

In Andhra Pradesh, only societies, associations, or trusts can establish educational institutions, as individuals are prohibited from doing so under Section 20A of the AP Education Act.

CIT v. Sakal Relief Fund
81 Taxmann.com 396 · 2017 · High Court
22
citing judgments

For a charitable trust to claim exemption under Section 11, intimation in Form 10 must be filed with the Assessing Officer before the completion of assessment proceedings. This requirement applies even if the Form 10 is filed during reassessment proceedings.

Association of Indian Panelboard Manufacturer v. DCIT
143 Taxmann.com 418 · 2022 · ITAT
21
citing judgments

The jurisdictional Commissioner or Director of Income Tax, not the Commissioner (Appeals), has the power to condone delays in filing Form 10B under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act.

R.B. Shreeram Religious and Charitable Trust v. CIT
172 ITR 373 · 1988 · Supreme Court
21
citing judgments

Voluntary contributions specifically received towards the corpus of a trust cannot be assessed as income, even when considering the law prior to amendments to Section 12 of the Income Tax Act.

Jammu Development Authority v. CIT, Jammu
23 Taxmann.com 343 · 2012 · Reported
21
citing judgments

The introduction of the proviso to Section 2(15) resulted in the omission of Section 10(20A), thereby removing the exemption benefit previously available to authorities constituted for housing, planning, development, or improvement of cities and villages.

DIT v. Pariwar Sewa Sansthan
254 ITR 268 · 2002 · High Court
21
citing judgments

Payments to parties specified under section 13(3) do not violate section 13(1)(c) if they are reasonable and not excessive. Such cases do not give rise to a question of law for appeal.