Chandraprabhuji Maharaj Jain v. DCIT

110 Taxmann.com 11High Court2019#4663 most cited

What is Chandraprabhuji Maharaj Jain v. DCIT authority for?

Filing Form No. 10 for accumulation of income under section 11(2) beyond the due date does not disentitle a trust from claiming exemption under section 11, and the Assessing Officer should examine the admissibility of the benefit rather than disallowing it on technicalities.

25

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Chandraprabhuji Maharaj Jain v. DCIT · section 11(2) · Form 10 · accumulation of income · delay in filing · exemption under section 11 · admissibility of benefit · technicalities

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Chandraprabhuji Maharaj Jain v. DCIT

DEVASAKAYAM AANGILAPPALLI PARIPALANA SABAI,MADURAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD,, MADURAI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 933/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:933/Chny/2025 धनिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Years: 2018-19 Devasakayam Aangilappalli Income Tax Officer, Paripalana Sabai, Vs. Exemptions Ward, No.11, Devasakayam Matriculation Madurai. Hr.Sec.School, Pasumalai, Madurai – 625 004. [Pan:Aaatd-0964-E] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. G. Akash, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Kumar Chandan, J.C.I.T
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 250

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, ‘ए’ न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI श्री जॉजज जॉजज के, उपाध्यक्ष एवं श्री एस.आर.रघुनाथा, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.:933/Chny/2025 धनिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Years: 2018-19 Devasakayam Aangilappalli Income Tax Officer, Paripalana Sabai, vs. Exemptions Ward, No.11, Devasakayam Matriculation Madurai. Hr.Sec.School, Pasumalai, Madurai – 625 004. [PAN:AAATD-0964-E] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर से/Appellant by : Shri. G. Akash, Adv…

MADRAS PORT AND DOCK EDUCATIONAL TRUST HIGHER SEC. SCHOOL,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD-2,, CHENNAI

In the result both the appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 938/CHNY/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Jul 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.:937 & 938/Chny/2025 धनि््रणवर्/ Assessment Years: 2021-22 & 2022-23 Chennai Port & Dock Educational Ito, Trust Higher Secondary School Vs. Exemptions Ward-2, (Formerly Known As Madras Port & Chennai – 600 034. Dock Educational Trust Higher Secondary School), Mdlb Housing Colony, Tondiarpet, Chennai – 600 081. [Pan:Aaaam-8192-L] (अपील्थ्/Appellant) (प्थ्/Respondent) अपील्थ्कीओरसे/Appellant By : Shri. Suraj Nahar, C.A. प्थ्कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri. Kumar Chandan, J.C.I.T. सुनव््कीत्रीख/Date Of Hearing : 17.06.2025 घोरण्कीत्रीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30.07.2025

For Appellant: Shri. Suraj Nahar, C.AFor Respondent: Shri. Kumar Chandan, J.C.I.T
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 234BSection 250

…आयकरअपीलीयअधिकरण, ‘ए’ न्यपीप, चेन् IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI शीजॉज्जॉज्के, उप्ध्एवंशीएस.आर.रघुन्थ्, लेख्सदसकेसम् BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./ITA Nos.:937 & 938/Chny/2025 धनि््रणवर्/ Assessment Years: 2021-22 & 2022-23 Chennai Port and Dock Educational ITO, Trust Higher Secondary School vs. Exemptions Ward-2, (Formerly known as Madras Port and Chennai – 600 034. Dock Educational Trust Higher Secondary School), MDLB Housing Colony, Tondiarpet, Chennai – 600 081. [PAN:AAAAM-8192-L] (अपील्थ्/Appellant) (प्थ्/Responde…

MADRAS PORT AND DOCK EDUCATIONAL TRUST HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD-2,, CHENNAI

In the result both the appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 937/CHNY/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Jul 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.:937 & 938/Chny/2025 धनि््रणवर्/ Assessment Years: 2021-22 & 2022-23 Chennai Port & Dock Educational Ito, Trust Higher Secondary School Vs. Exemptions Ward-2, (Formerly Known As Madras Port & Chennai – 600 034. Dock Educational Trust Higher Secondary School), Mdlb Housing Colony, Tondiarpet, Chennai – 600 081. [Pan:Aaaam-8192-L] (अपील्थ्/Appellant) (प्थ्/Respondent) अपील्थ्कीओरसे/Appellant By : Shri. Suraj Nahar, C.A. प्थ्कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri. Kumar Chandan, J.C.I.T. सुनव््कीत्रीख/Date Of Hearing : 17.06.2025 घोरण्कीत्रीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30.07.2025

For Appellant: Shri. Suraj Nahar, C.AFor Respondent: Shri. Kumar Chandan, J.C.I.T
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 234BSection 250

…आयकरअपीलीयअधिकरण, ‘ए’ न्यपीप, चेन् IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI शीजॉज्जॉज्के, उप्ध्एवंशीएस.आर.रघुन्थ्, लेख्सदसकेसम् BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./ITA Nos.:937 & 938/Chny/2025 धनि््रणवर्/ Assessment Years: 2021-22 & 2022-23 Chennai Port and Dock Educational ITO, Trust Higher Secondary School vs. Exemptions Ward-2, (Formerly known as Madras Port and Chennai – 600 034. Dock Educational Trust Higher Secondary School), MDLB Housing Colony, Tondiarpet, Chennai – 600 081. [PAN:AAAAM-8192-L] (अपील्थ्/Appellant) (प्थ्/Responde…

M/S. ALTERNATIVE INDIA FOR DEVELOPMENT,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD-4, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2114/CHNY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 2114/Chny/2024 निर्ाारण वर्ा /Assessment Years: 2016-17 M/S.Alternative India For Development The Income Tax Officer, No.1, Vgn Nagar, Iyyappanthangal, Exemption Ward(4), Kattupakkam Post, Chennai. Chennai-600 056. [Pan: Aaata4184H] (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri D.Anand & Mr.P.Hari, Advocates. प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Ms.E.Pavuna Sundari, Addl.Cit सुिवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 07.01.2025 घोर्णा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 22.01.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M :

For Appellant: Shri D.Anand & Mr.P.Hari, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Ms.E.Pavuna Sundari, Addl.CIT
Section 11Section 11(2)Section 250

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, ‘‘ए’ न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI श्री यस यस विश्वनेत्र रवि, न्यावयक सदस्य एवं श्री अविताभ शुक्ला, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE SHRI SS VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No. 2114/Chny/2024 निर्ाारण वर्ा /Assessment Years: 2016-17 M/s.Alternative India for Development The Income Tax Officer, No.1, Vgn Nagar, Iyyappanthangal, Exemption Ward(4), Kattupakkam Post, Chennai. Chennai-600 056. [PAN: AAATA4184H] (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee by : Shri D.An…

RAJIV COLLEGE OF EXCELLENCE EDUCATIONAL TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ACIT (EXEMPTIONS), CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed for the statistical purposes

ITA 1433/CHNY/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Sept 2024AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.: 1433/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2022-23 Assistant Commissioner Of Rajiv College Of Excellence V. Income Tax (Exemptions), Educational Trust, Chennai – 600 034. 5/516B, Sakthisai Ram Street, Ganapathy Nagar, Alapakkam, Chennai – 600 116. [Pan:Aabtr-0607-B] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri. M. Karunakaran, Advocate ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By : Smt. M.S. Deeptha, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 07.08.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 04.09.2024 आदेश /O R D E R Per S. R. Raghunatha:

For Appellant: Shri. M. Karunakaran, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. M.S. Deeptha, JCIT
Section 1Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(b)Section 143Section 143(1)

…tion of assessment. Similar is the decision of Jaipur Tribunal in the case of DCIT vs. State Institute of Health & Family Welfare (153 Taxmann.com 740). The ratio of case law of Hon’ble High Court of Madras in the case of Chandraprabhuji Maharaj Jain vs DCIT (110 Taxmann.com 11) also supports the above conclusion. In this decision, Hon’ble Court has held that filing of Form No.10 for accumulation of income u/s 11(2) which was filed beyond due date could not disentitle the trust from exemption claimed u/s 11. The Hon’ble Court directed Ld. AO to examine the admissibility of benefit rather than to foreclose Assesse…

Showing 120 of 25 · Page 1 of 2