CIT v. Sree Narayana Chandrika Trust

212 ITR 456High Court1995#5008 most cited

What is CIT v. Sree Narayana Chandrika Trust authority for?

The High Court decision in CIT v. Sree Narayana Chandrika Trust (1995) 212 ITR 456 (Ker) is cited in support of the proposition that a trust may not be eligible for exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad) if it derives income from business activities, such as running a theatre.

23

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Sree Narayana Chandrika Trust · 212 ITR 456 · section 10(23C)(iiiad) · charitable trust exemption · business income of trust · Geethangali Theatre income · educational purposes · trust running business · exemption denial · exemption eligibility

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Sree Narayana Chandrika Trust

M/S. B.BANAMBER & CO.,CUTTACK vs. CIT, BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as per the direction indicated above

ITA 404/CTK/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack29 Mar 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: S/ S/Shri Chandra Mohan Garg, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiaassessment Year : 2009-2010 2010 M/S. B.Banamber & Co., M/S. B.Banamber & Co., Vs. Cit, Bhubaneswar Cit, Bhubaneswar Bhairabi Sahi, Talcher. Bhairabi Sahi, Talcher. Pan No.Aadfb 2121 Q Pan No.Aadfb 2121 Q (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By Assessee By : S/Shri S.N..Sahu & Somanath Sahu S.N..Sahu & Somanath Sahu, Ars Revenue By : Shri M.K.Goutam, M.K.Goutam, Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 10/3/ 20 / 2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 29/ /3/2022 O R D E R Per C.M.Garg G, Jm

For Appellant: S/Shri S.N..Sahu, & Somanath SahuFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Goutam
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 263Section 44A

…e and effective, it should be issued, so as to be beyond the control of the authority concerned, for any possible change or modification therein. This should be done within the prescribed period. Case laws referred : a. CIT Vs. Shree Narayan Chandrika Trustee 212 ITR 456 (Ker) b. Shelat (B. J.) State of Guj'rat AIR 1978 SC 1109. 4. That once learned AO has resorted to estimate by way of adhoc disallowance of expenses claimed, it is an implied way of rejection of accounts. There can be no further addition relying on the same accounts. Case laws cited : a. Teja Construction - 129 TTJ - 57 b. Indwell Construction Vs…

Showing 120 of 23 · Page 1 of 2

CIT v. Sree Narayana Chandrika Trust (212 ITR 456) — Cited in 23 Judgments | BharatTax