Landmark Cases on Business Income and Deductions

2,356 decisions, ranked by how many judgments on BharatTax rely on them.

CIT v. Williamson Financial Services
165 Taxmann 638 · 2007 · Supreme Court
67
citing judgments

Income-tax is levied on the total income of an assessee, not on gross receipts. The tax is on income, and deductions for expenditure are permissible.

378 ITR 443 (Kerala); and Unifac Management Services (India) P. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT
409 ITR 225 · 2018 · High Court
67
citing judgments

The beneficial provisions of Section 43B do not apply to sums covered by Section 36(1)(va), which are employee contributions to welfare funds. The scope of Section 43B and Section 36(1)(va) are distinct, meaning belated payment of employee contributions is not deductible under Section 43B, and only Section 36(1)(va) read with Section 2(24)(x) governs their deductibility.

DCIT v. Panna Corporation
74 DTR 89 · 2012 · High Court
67
citing judgments

When unaccounted cash or on-money receipts are detected, only the profit element embedded in such receipts is taxable, not the entire gross amount, and this profit requires estimation.

Cummins India Ltd. v. DCIT
96 Taxmann.com 576 · 2018 · ITAT
67
citing judgments

The weighted deduction for scientific research expenditure under Section 35(2AB) is allowable, clarifying that the requirement for the prescribed authority to approve or quantify the expenditure from year to year became effective only from April 1, 2016, through amendments to Rule 6(7A)(b).

CIT v. Britannia Industries Ltd.
280 ITR 525 · 2006 · High Court
67
citing judgments

When an assessee has both borrowed funds and sufficient interest-free own funds, and makes interest-free advances, it is presumed that the advances were made from the own funds, and no interest disallowance is made under Section 36(1)(iii) on the borrowed funds.

Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. v. CIT
63 ITR 57 · 1967 · Supreme Court
67
citing judgments

The question of whether an amount claimed as an expenditure was laid out wholly and exclusively for business purposes must be decided based on the facts and circumstances of each case. The Income-tax Officer retains the discretion to determine the deductibility of an expense, and the mere existence of an agreement or actual payment does not bind the officer to allow the deduction under Section 37.

Champion Engineering Works Ltd. v. CIT (1971) 81 ITR 273 (Bom), CIT v. Bowrisankara Stemp Ferry Co.
165 ITR 63 · 1987 · High Court
66
citing judgments

The case is cited for the principle that when a payment is made for a non-compete agreement which is part of a larger business transfer, the characterisation of the payment depends on whether it is for the enduring benefit of the business or for the loss of potential profits.

CIT v. Synergy Financial Exchange Ltd.
288 ITR 366 · 2007 · High Court
66
citing judgments

Employee contributions to specified funds (like PF/ESI) are deductible under section 36(1)(va) even if paid beyond the statutory due dates, provided they are remitted before the due date for filing the income-tax return.

Punjab Stainless Steel Inds v. CIT
324 ITR 396 · 2010 · High Court
66
citing judgments

This case establishes that merely having sufficient interest-free own funds does not automatically prevent interest disallowance on interest-free advances; the assessee must affirmatively prove the business or commercial expediency of such advances.

Guffic Chem (P.) Ltd. v. CIT
332 ITR 602 · 2011 · Supreme Court
66
citing judgments

Compensation received for a non-compete covenant or for not carrying on a specific business activity is a capital receipt and not liable to tax as business income.

CIT v. Deepak Mittal
361 ITR 131 · 2014 · High Court
66
citing judgments

The Assessing Officer must record explicit dissatisfaction with the assessee's claim or calculation of expenses related to exempt income before applying Rule 8D for disallowance under Section 14A. This principle also extends to the requirement of adequate inquiry before allowing or disallowing Chapter VI-A deductions like Section 80P.

CIT v. Oriental Structural Engineers Pvt. Ltd.
216 Taxmann 92 · 2013 · High Court
66
citing judgments

A joint venture formed solely to secure a contract, with each partner having a distinctly outlined scope of work and individual responsibility, is not considered an 'Association of Persons' for income tax purposes.

CIT v. Ciba India Ltd.
69 ITR 692 · 1968 · Supreme Court
65
citing judgments

Payments for the use of technical know-how or intellectual property, which grant a right to use rather than an outright transfer of ownership, are deductible revenue expenditures as they do not create an enduring benefit, especially in fields with rapid technological obsolescence.

Lakshmiji Sugar Mills Co. (P) Ltd. v. CIT
82 ITR 376 · 1971 · Supreme Court
65
citing judgments

A one-time lease rent payment made for a lease period is generally considered capital expenditure and not deductible as a revenue expenditure.

Simple Foods Products Ltd. v. CIT
84 Taxmann.com 239 · 2017 · High Court
65
citing judgments

An assessee is entitled to the continuance of tax holiday relief for subsequent years if it was granted for the initial assessment year, and the Assessing Officer cannot refuse to continue the allowance without disturbing the relief for the initial year.

CIT v. Lok
308 ITR 356 · 2009 · High Court
65
citing judgments

Interest earned by an assessee on temporary deposits of surplus funds, which are received as advances in a business activity and are inextricably linked to that business, is assessable as 'Profits and Gains from Business or Profession' rather than 'Income from Other Sources'.

CIT v. Cadila Healthcare Ltd.
31 Taxmann.com 300 · 2013 · High Court
65
citing judgments

Section 35(2AB), an incentive provision, allows weighted deduction for expenditure 'on in-house research or development facility' even if related activities like clinical trials are conducted externally, provided they are for the in-house research. This requires a liberal interpretation of the provision.

Narain Swadeshi Weaving Mills v. Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax
26 ITR 765 · 1954 · Supreme Court
64
citing judgments

The definition of 'business' is of wide import, encompassing any trade, commerce, manufacture, or adventure in the nature of trade. Even a single and isolated transaction can constitute an 'adventure in the nature of trade' if it bears the clear indicia of trade, and no fixed formula can be evolved to determine the character of such isolated transactions.

CIT v. Mahalaxmi Glass Works (P) Ltd.
318 ITR 116 · 2009 · High Court
64
citing judgments

When the valuation of closing stock is adjusted to include CENVAT or Modvat credit under Section 145A, a corresponding adjustment must also be made to the opening stock.

CIT v. CPL Tannery
318 ITR 179 · 2009 · High Court
64
citing judgments

Disallowance under Section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is not justified for cash payments if they are genuine, made out of business expediency, and the assessee's bona fides are not disputed, even after the 2009 amendments to the section.

Bright Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT
381 ITR 107 · 2016 · High Court
64
citing judgments

No disallowance of interest expenditure can be made under Section 36(1)(iii) merely on the presumption of diversion of borrowed funds, if the assessee possesses sufficient interest-free own funds to cover interest-free advances.

CIT v. Best & Co. (P.) Ltd.
60 ITR 11 · 1966 · Supreme Court
64
citing judgments

Compensation received for the breach of a contract for hotel management is a capital receipt, not a trading receipt. Similarly, compensation for agreeing not to carry on competitive business or for loss of goodwill is also considered a capital receipt.

Foundry (P.) Ltd. v. CIT
78 Taxmann.com 47 · 2017 · High Court
64
citing judgments

An employer can claim deduction for employee contributions to provident fund or ESI under Section 36(1)(va) if these sums are deposited on or before the due date for filing the income tax return under Section 139, extending the benefit of Section 43B to such payments.

Pragathi Krishna Gramin Bank v. JCIT
95 Taxmann.com 41 · 2018 · High Court
64
citing judgments

No disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act is warranted when the assessee's own interest-free funds are sufficient to cover the tax-free investments made.

CIT v. AKS Alloys (P.) Ltd.
18 Taxmann.com 25 · 2012 · High Court
64
citing judgments

For claiming deductions under Section 80IB, the audit report in Form 10CCB can be filed any time before the assessment is completed, even if not submitted along with the original return of income.

Pr. CIT v. Welspun Steel Ltd.
264 Taxmann 252 · 2019 · High Court
64
citing judgments

Payments made to meet any portion of the actual cost, as contemplated under Explanation 10 to Section 43(1) of the Income Tax Act, are eligible for consideration.

Asstt. CIT v. Pratibha Industries Ltd.
141 ITD 151 · 2013 · ITAT
64
citing judgments

Where an assessee invests its own funds in an infrastructure development project, it is presumed to be acting as a developer, not merely a contractor, making it eligible for deduction under section 80-IA(4).

Commissioner of Income-tax v. Motor Industries Company Limited
223 ITR 112 · 1997 · High Court
64
citing judgments

The issuance of bonus shares by capitalizing profits does not result in an increase in the company's capital employed or an expansion of its profit-making apparatus.

Calico Dyeing & Printing Works v. CIT
34 ITR 265 · 1958 · High Court
63
citing judgments

For claiming a deduction of interest paid on borrowed capital under Section 36(1)(iii), an assessee must show that the capital was used for business purposes; the nature of the asset acquired (revenue or capital) with such capital is irrelevant.

CIT v. Vasisth Chay Vyapar Ltd.
410 ITR 244 · 2019 · Supreme Court
63
citing judgments
CIT v. Samtel Color Ltd.
326 ITR 425 · 2010 · High Court
63
citing judgments

Corporate club membership fees, including admission and subscription fees, incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes to improve business relations and prospects, are allowable as revenue expenditure. This principle applies when there is a proximate nexus between the expenditure and the business.

B.T. Patil& Sons Belgaum Construction P. Ltd. v. ACIT
126 TTJ 577 · 2009 · ITAT
63
citing judgments

A Special Bench decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concerning Section 80IA deduction for infrastructure facility developers can be recalled if it fails to consider a binding jurisdictional High Court judgment.

KeshrichandJaisukhlal v. CIT
199 ITR 702 · 1993 · High Court
62
citing judgments

Notional income, such as notional interest on interest-free loans, cannot be brought to tax without a specific statutory provision in the Income Tax Act. Only real income that has accrued or been received by the assessee is subject to income tax.

272 CTR 282 (Del) CIT v. Lakhani Marketing Incl
272 CTR 265 · 2014 · High Court
62
citing judgments

No disallowance of expenditure can be made when there is no income generated from the investment.

Hindustan Unilever Ltd. v. DCIT
325 ITR 102 · 2010 · High Court
62
citing judgments

The deduction under Section 10A/10B is a deduction, not an exemption, and must be given effect to at the stage of computing the profits and gains of business. For this purpose, commercial profits mean profits without adjustment of depreciation as per the Income Tax Act.

CIT v. Nangalia Fabrics (P.) Ltd.
40 Taxmann.com 206 · 2013 · High Court
62
citing judgments

Where purchases are supported by bills, reflected in books of account, and payments are made through account payee cheques, such purchases cannot be treated as bogus in the absence of specific contrary evidence from the Assessing Officer.

State Bank of Patiala v. CIT
272 ITR 54 · 2005 · High Court
62
citing judgments

A claim for deduction under Section 36(1)(viia) for bad and doubtful debts is restricted to the actual amount of provision made by the assessee, as the statutory language is clear and unambiguous.

CIT v. Canfin Homes Ltd.
347 ITR 382 · 2012 · High Court
62
citing judgments

Interest income from non-performing assets (NPAs) is not assessable as income, even for assessees following the mercantile system of accounting, in the context of Section 145 of the Income-tax Act.

PCIT v. Delhi International Airport (P) Ltd.
144 Taxmann.com 80 · 2022 · High Court
62
citing judgments

Section 14A, read with Rule 8D, does not apply if no exempt income was earned or is receivable in the relevant assessment year. Amendments to Section 14A are generally clarificatory and applied prospectively.

PCIT v. Rajasthan State Beverages Corporation Ltd.
250 Taxmann 16 · 2017 · Supreme Court
61
citing judgments

Amounts claimed on account of employees' contributions to Provident Fund (PF) and Employees' State Insurance (ESI), if deposited on or before the due date for filing the income-tax return, cannot be disallowed under Section 43B or Section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act.

CIT v. Symphony Marketing Solutions India Pvt.Ltd.
388 ITR 457 · 2016 · Reported
61
citing judgments

Ad-hoc disallowances of employee per diem allowances are not permissible solely due to non-collation of bills if the expenditure is actually incurred.

PRINCIPAL COMMISSINOEI? OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER v. GOLDMEN SACHS SERVICES P. LTD.
409 ITR 258 · 2018 · High Court
61
citing judgments

Disallowance under Section 14A towards interest expenditure is permissible when there is no direct nexus established between the borrowed funds and tax-exempt investments, particularly if tax-free investments have decreased.

19 ITR 191 Lakshimaratan Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. v. CIT (SC)
73 ITR 634 · 1969 · Supreme Court
61
citing judgments

When claiming an expenditure under section 37(1), the onus is on the assessee to prove the necessary facts, not on the revenue. Mere production of vouchers is insufficient if the genuineness of payment is doubted.

General Insurance Corporation of India v. CIT
240 ITR 139 · 1999 · Supreme Court
61
citing judgments

Rule 5(a) of the First Schedule to the Income Tax Act applies to add back an amount only if it is an expenditure or allowance contemplated in sections 30 to 43A and is specifically disallowed. Without such a specific prohibition, amounts like provisions for preference share redemption or amortization cannot be added back to an insurance company's profits.

Mysore Kirloskar Ltd. v. CIT
166 ITR 836 · 1987 · High Court
61
citing judgments

For an expenditure to be deductible under Section 37(1), its object or motive must be solely for promoting the business. Donations made for the smooth functioning or commercial expediency of the business can also be allowable.

CIT v. Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd.
355 ITR 14 · 2013 · High Court
61
citing judgments

For Section 80IA and 80IB deductions, the profits of an eligible industrial undertaking or unit must be computed independently based on its actual profitability and market-rate inter-unit transactions, rather than applying a global profit margin of all the assessee's units.

Kesoram Industries & Cotton Mills Ltd. v. CIT
196 ITR 845 · 1992 · High Court
61
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred for exploring the feasibility of expanding or extending an existing business by setting up a new unit in the same line of business is revenue expenditure, not capital expenditure. Such expenditure, including obtaining project reports or legal opinions on desirability or feasibility, does not constitute the setting up of a new business.

Income Tax, (1989) 111 ITR 377 (SC) and Jonas Woodhead and Sons (India) Limited v. CIT
224 ITR 342 · 1997 · Supreme Court
60
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred for the expansion, extension, or betterment of an existing business, or for improvisation that is part of the existing business, is allowable as revenue expenditure. Payments made for acquiring technical know-how and exclusive rights for setting up a new business can be capital expenditure.

SPL Industries v. CIT
9 Taxmann.com 195 · 2011 · High Court
60
citing judgments

Employee contributions to welfare funds are deductible if paid by the Income Tax Return due date, regardless of the due date prescribed under the specific fund Acts.

Binani Cements Ltd. v. CIT
380 ITR 116 · 2016 · High Court
60
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred in respect of abandoned cell towers is an allowable business expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, especially when no new business was being set up by the assessee.