CIT v. Veerdip Rollers (P.) Ltd.
323 ITR 341High Court2010#1795 most cited
What is CIT v. Veerdip Rollers (P.) Ltd. authority for?
The Revenue must discharge the primary burden of proof to establish understatement or concealment of income before making additions. Additions cannot be sustained if the Revenue fails to discharge this burden.
63
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2024.
Also referred to as
CIT v. Veerdip Rollers (P.) Ltd. · addition u/s 69B · burden of proof · understatement of income · concealment of income · Revenue's burden · Assessing Officer · concurrent findings of fact