CIT v. Veerdip Rollers (P.) Ltd.
323 ITR 341High Court2010#1796 most cited
What is CIT v. Veerdip Rollers (P.) Ltd. authority for?
If the revenue does not dispute the quantitative details of stock and fails to inquire into the assessee's explanation regarding a difference in the value of closing stock, a mere difference in valuation may not warrant an adjustment. The burden is on the revenue to investigate the assessee's explanation concerning stock inclusion.
63
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2024.
Also referred to as
CIT v. Veerdip Rollers (P.) Ltd. · 323 ITR 341 · Gujarat High Court · closing stock valuation · quantitative discrepancy · Assessing Officer inquiry · assessee explanation · stock statement · revenue burden of proof · section 145A
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing CIT v. Veerdip Rollers (P.) Ltd.
Showing 1–20 of 63 · Page 1 of 4