CIT v. Cadila Healthcare Ltd.
31 Taxmann.com 300High Court2013#2247 most cited
What is CIT v. Cadila Healthcare Ltd. authority for?
Section 35(2AB), an incentive provision, allows weighted deduction for expenditure 'on in-house research or development facility' even if related activities like clinical trials are conducted externally, provided they are for the in-house research. This requires a liberal interpretation of the provision.
52
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2026.
Also referred to as
CIT v. Cadila Healthcare Ltd. · Cadila Healthcare · Section 35(2AB) · weighted deduction · scientific research expenditure · in-house research · R&D expenses · clinical trials · liberal interpretation · expenditure outside facility
Also reported as
214 Taxmann 672
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing CIT v. Cadila Healthcare Ltd.
Showing 1–20 of 52 · Page 1 of 3