Landmark Cases on Business Income and Deductions

1,976 decisions, ranked by how many judgments on BharatTax rely on them.

Regal Theatre v. CIT
334 ITR 326 · 2011 · High Court
13
citing judgments

Payment of interest cannot be disallowed as business expenditure merely because the assessee is a cash-rich company. Expenditure incurred subsequent to project completion, following the percentage completion method, must be allowed as revenue expenditure.

Roger Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. IAC
336 ITR 400 · 2011 · High Court
13
citing judgments

The Assessing Officer cannot arbitrarily reject the profit margin disclosed by the assessee and must base estimations on a rational and fair basis.

(d) TRG Industries P Ltd. v. DCIT
35 Taxmann.com 253 · 2013 · ITAT
13
citing judgments

Businesses engaged in works contracts after amendments to Section 80-IA(4) are not eligible for deduction under that section as works contracts have been specifically excluded.

Commissioner of Income-tax v. Malhar Information Services
351 ITR 119 · 2013 · High Court
13
citing judgments

An assessee engaged in transmitting customized electronic data abroad is entitled to deduction under Section 80HHE, as such business activities fall within the scope of the section.

CIT v. Handicrafts and Handlooms Exports Corporation of India Limited
360 ITR 130 · 2014 · High Court
13
citing judgments

Grants released by the government for repairs and maintenance are capital receipts and not revenue income, thus not taxable.

Oswal Agro Mills Ltd. v. CIT
363 ITR 486 · 2014 · High Court
13
citing judgments

A provision for expenses can only be recognized for tax deduction when the obligation has already fructified, meaning it has become a present liability.

Eastern (P) Ltd. (202) 1224 Taxman 769 (Gau); Commissioner of Income-tax, Panchkula v. Micro Instruments Co.
388 ITR 46 · 2016 · High Court
13
citing judgments

An assessee is not required to maintain separate books of account for an undertaking eligible for deduction under section 80IB of the Income Tax Act.

Collector of Central Excise, Jaipur v. Rajasthan State Chemical Works
4 SCC 473 · 1991 · Reported
13
citing judgments

An activity is considered 'manufacture' if it results in a new and different good with a distinctive name, use, and character, or if the process is so integral to the ultimate production of goods that it is impossible or commercially inexpedient without it.

DCIT v. T.Jayachandran
406 ITR 1 · 2018 · Supreme Court
13
citing judgments

Where an obligation requires a receipt to be applied to discharge it after it has reached the assessee, it forms part of the assessee's income. The nature of the obligation is the determining factor.

PCIT v. Uttarbanga Kshetriya Gramina Bank
408 ITR 393 · 2018 · High Court
13
citing judgments

For the purposes of the deduction under Section 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the aggregate average advances made by rural branches of a scheduled bank should be computed by aggregating separately the advances made by each rural branch as outstanding at the end of the last day of each month comprised in the previous year. The method of taking only the loans and advances made during the year is incorrect.

(i) ACIT v. Tata Housing Development Company Ltd.
45 SOT 9 · 2011 · ITAT
13
citing judgments

Interest paid on borrowed funds used for construction is deductible as a revenue expenditure, even if the assessee follows the projection completion method. Such interest can be allowed as a deduction under section 36(1)(iii).

358 ITR 323 (Guj) & CIT v. Amod Stamping (P.)Ltd.
45 Taxmann.com 427 · 2014 · High Court
13
citing judgments

Where interest-free funds available with the assessee are sufficient to meet the investments made, a presumption arises that such investments are out of interest-free funds, and therefore, interest paid on borrowed funds is deductible. The assessing officer must establish a direct nexus between borrowed funds and the investment in capital work-in-progress (CWIP) to disallow interest.

CIT v. Mogul Lines Ltd.
46 ITR 590 · 1962 · High Court
13
citing judgments

Taxability of an income or expenditure is determined by the provisions of the Income Tax Act, not by the accounting entries made by the assessee. The actual nature of the transaction under the law dictates tax consequences, irrespective of how it is reflected in the books of account.

KMC Construction Ltd. v. ACIT
51 SOT 214 · ITAT
13
citing judgments

The construction, delivery, and maintenance of an infrastructure facility constitutes a transfer of property in chattel, not merely a contract for services. This distinction is relevant in determining tax liabilities, especially for deductions and business income.

DCIT v. UAG Builders Pvt. Ltd.
53 SOT 370 · ITAT
13
citing judgments

Interest paid on debentures, whether fully, partly, or optionally convertible, is deductible as a business expense, as debentures are considered debt until the date of conversion.

151 ITR 653 (Mad.), CIT v. Coimbatore Salem Transports (p) Ltd.
61 ITR 480 · 1966 · High Court
13
citing judgments

The assessee bears the burden of proving that borrowed funds were utilized for business purposes, particularly when claiming deductions for interest paid on such borrowings.

Jabbar (M.A.) v. CJT, Andra Pradesh
68 ITR 493 · 1968 · Supreme Court
13
citing judgments

Expenditure is revenue in character if the object for which a lease is taken and the nature of payment are for acquiring a short-term asset for disposal, rather than for acquiring an asset of enduring benefit.

Raipur Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 19 STC 1 (SC), Director of Supplies and Disposal v. Member, Board of Revenue
71 ITR 504 · 1969 · High Court
13
citing judgments

The terms "trade, commerce or business" can be explained through the concept of "economic activity", which is relevant for indirect taxes like sales tax, VAT, and excise duty, as the taxable event arises from such activity, not income. This applies even if the activity is conducted on a "no loss no profit" basis.

CIT v. JCB India Ltd.
71 Taxmann.com 30 · 2016 · High Court
13
citing judgments

Research and development charges are to be allowed as revenue expenditure under Section 37 of the Income-tax Act if they are incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes.

Blue Star Engineering Co.(Bombay)(p.) Itd v. CIT
73 ITR 283 · 1969 · High Court
13
citing judgments

For a business connection to exist under section 42, the non-resident's activity in India must have a continuous, intimate, and real relationship with their business, contributing to profit generation. Rectification under section 154 extends to eliminating errors that may undermine the entire order.

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. Principal Officer, Hill View Infrastructure (P) Ltd.
81 Taxmann.com 58 · 2017 · High Court
13
citing judgments

Where an assessee company consistently follows the project completion method for computing profits in the real estate business, the Assessing Officer cannot unilaterally apply the percentage completion method.

SIAL SBEC Bioenergy Ltd. v. DCIT
83 TTJ 866 · 2004 · ITAT
13
citing judgments

Steam generated is considered a form of power for the purpose of claiming deductions under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act.

1. CIT v. Golani Brothers
85 Taxmann.com 355 · 2017 · High Court
13
citing judgments

If business receipts are accepted based on seized documents, related expenditure must also be accepted, and net income estimated. No separate addition for unexplained expenditure under section 69C is permissible if business receipts under section 28 are already accepted.

Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Company Ltd. v. DCIT
87 Taxmann.com 213 · 2017 · ITAT
13
citing judgments

Technical know-how fees are recoverable for a specified period, and this recovery is permissible when approved by the RBI. The issue has been decided in favour of the assessee in its own case for identical facts and assessment years.

CIT v. Sarabhai Sons Pvt.Ltd.(973
90 ITR 318 · 1973 · High Court
13
citing judgments

A business is considered 'set up' when it is established and ready to start functioning as a manufacturing or business organization, distinguishing it from mere operations for setting up or commencement of business. Expenses incurred before the actual commencement but after the business is set up are allowable as revenue expenditure.

Amar Raja Batteries Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT
91 ITD 280 · 2004 · ITAT
13
citing judgments

Expenditure treated as deferred revenue expenditure, where the benefit is enduring but the expenditure is in the revenue field, is considered revenue expenditure. This implies that tax law does not recognise a separate concept of deferred revenue expenditure distinct from capital or revenue expenditure.

1331TR 34 (Mad), CIT v. Wheels India Ltd.
95 TTJ 14 · ITAT
13
citing judgments

Income from the sale of scrap generated during manufacturing activities is eligible for deduction under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act.

Kolkata in ABN Amro Bank v. JCIT
97 ITD 1 · 2005 · ITAT
13
citing judgments

Expenses incurred wholly and exclusively by an Indian branch are not allocable to other branches or the head office, and Section 44C of the Act is not applicable in such cases.

98 DTR 105 (Raj.) (HC) CIT v. Udaipur DugdhUtpadakSahakariSangh Ltd.
98 DTR 109 · 2013 · High Court
13
citing judgments

The employer's contribution to employees' provident fund paid after the due date is not eligible for deduction if paid after the due date for filing the return of income.

Kansara Bearings Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT
99 TTJ 164 · 2006 · ITAT
13
citing judgments

When rejecting an assessee's books of account, the Assessing Officer should use the assessee's past profit history as the best guide for estimating trading results. This past history takes precedence over comparable cases.

T.T. (P) Ltd. v. CIT
139 ITR 827 · 1983 · High Court
13
citing judgments

The Assessing Officer (AO) cannot intervene in business decisions made by an assessee for commercial expediency, nor can the AO replace the assessee's judgment in such matters. Decisions made by the assessee are presumed to be taken out of commercial expediency.

Smith Kline & French (India) Ltd. v. CIT
193 ITR 582 · 1992 · High Court
13
citing judgments

Sales promotion and publicity expenses are considered business expenditures aimed at generating goodwill and facilitating business operations, falling under commercial expediency. These activities are not limited to direct media propaganda but can include indirect approaches to market presence.

Shivshakti Flour Mills (P.) Ltd. v. CIT
390 ITR 346 · 2017 · High Court
13
citing judgments

A transport subsidy intended to stimulate industrial activity and development in a backward region is a capital receipt, not a revenue receipt, regardless of the accounting procedure followed by the assessee.

Ayush Ajay Construction Ltd. v. ITO (
95 ITD 1 · 2005 · ITAT
13
citing judgments

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) confirmed a decision regarding the eligibility for deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The High Court formulated a question of law concerning whether the assessee fulfilled the conditions for this deduction.

CIT v. Mehsana District Co-operative Milk Producers Union Ltd.
146 Taxmann 355 · 2006 · High Court
13
citing judgments

Payments made by a milk cooperative union to its member societies based on the quantity of milk supplied, representing a final rate difference, are not distributions of profit and are allowable as business expenditure. This is because the resolutions to pay were passed before the end of the financial year, even if disbursement occurred later.

CIT v. G.K. Patel & Co.
212 Taxmann 384 · 2013 · High Court
13
citing judgments

Provisions of Section 41(1) cannot be invoked to treat an unpaid liability as income unless there is a declaration by the assessee that it does not intend to honor the liability, or there is a discharge of debt.

Arisudana Spinning Mills Ltd. v. CIT
26 Taxmann.com 39 · 2012 · Supreme Court
13
citing judgments

An assessee must maintain separate books of accounts for an industrial undertaking to be eligible for deductions under Section 80-IA, even if centralized accounts are maintained, provided there is no interlacing or interdependence between units.

CIT v. Spice Distribution Ltd.
54 Taxmann.com 325 · 2015 · High Court
13
citing judgments

Expenses incurred by an assessee are considered revenue in nature if they are ongoing and incurred for the purpose of earning profits, rather than for establishing the profit-earning machinery.

Thackers H.P. & Co. v. CIT
134 ITR 21 · 1982 · High Court
13
citing judgments

Forfeited security deposits paid by a tendu leaves trader under a contract with a forest corporation, when the contract is not fulfilled, can be claimed as a business loss. The disallowance by the Assessing Officer is incorrect, and the claim can be allowed by the appellate authorities.

Marksans Pharma Ltd. v. DCIT
155 Taxmann.com 59 · 2023 · ITAT
13
citing judgments

The Assessing Officer (AO) cannot override the decision of the prescribed authority (DSIR) regarding the approval of expenditure for weighted deduction under section 35(2AB). The AO must allow the assessee an opportunity to be heard before quantifying any expenditure.

CIT v. Tata Robins Fraser Ltd.
211 Taxmann 257 · 2012 · High Court
13
citing judgments

Expenditure is capital in nature when its purpose is to bring a capital asset into existence, as determined by settled tests.

Manoj Kumar Samdaria v. CIT
223 Taxmann 245 · 2014 · High Court
13
citing judgments

Income arising from the sale of shares is assessable as business income when the assessee is selling shares very frequently with high volume and magnitude, and earning only a meagre amount of dividend.

Pr. CIT v. Shreno Ltd.
102 Taxmann.com 129 · 2019 · High Court
13
citing judgments

When an amount is written off as a bad debt in the assessee's books, it is sufficient compliance for claiming it as a deduction under section 36(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, without requiring the assessee to prove that the debt has actually become bad or unrecoverable.

Cooper Engineering Ltd. v. CIT
135 ITR 597 · 1982 · High Court
13
citing judgments

Where an assessee fails to furnish necessary details for a claim, the claim can be disallowed on the ground that the assessee has not established that the expenditure was incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of business.

CIT v. Computer Graphics Ltd.
285 ITR 84 · 2006 · High Court
13
citing judgments

The reasonableness of an expenditure must be judged from the viewpoint of a prudent businessman, considering the legitimate business needs and the benefit derived by the company, and not solely from the revenue's perspective. The approach should be that of a businessman.

DCM Ltd. v. CIT
198 ITR 69 · 1992 · Supreme Court
13
citing judgments
PCIT v. Sanghi Infrastructure Ltd. (
96 Taxmann.com 370 · 2018 · High Court
13
citing judgments

Deductions under Section 40(a)(ia) for payments where TDS was not deducted are not permissible if the liability was contingent and no bills were issued in the year of consideration.

CIT v. Prem Heavy Engg. Works (P.) Ltd.
150 Taxmann 90 · 2006 · High Court
13
citing judgments

Payment for acquiring technical know-how for the manufacture of a plant for a limited period is revenue expenditure, not capital expenditure.

CIT v. Pure Pharma (P) Ltd.
270 ITR 382 · 2005 · High Court
13
citing judgments

If an assessee proves that an expenditure was incurred in its commercial expediency for running the business effectively, the Revenue cannot deem it unnecessary or uncalled for.

CIT v. Sakthi Finance Ltd.
352 ITR 102 · 2013 · High Court
13
citing judgments

RBI norms permitting recognition of interest on NPAs on a cash basis for accounting do not override tax provisions; such interest income is taxable under the Income Tax Act even if not accrued in the assessee's books.