KNIGHT RIDERS SPORTS P. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 29, MUMBAI
The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations
ITA 1307/MUM/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Dec 2017AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri G.S.Pannu, Am & Shri Ravish Sood, Jm M/S Knight Riders Sports Acit, Central Circle-29, Private Limited, Deepvan बिधम/ Mumbai. Anand Vihar Society, 20Th Vs. Road, Khar (W), Mumbai-400 052 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ Pan No. Aadck3118M (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) :
For Appellant: Mr. J.D. Mistry, A.RFor Respondent: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32(1)(ii)Section 37(1)
…eral decisions in which it has been held that payments made for securing the right to supply of raw materials for several years would be on revenue account - Supreme Court decision in case of in Gotan Lime Syndicate Vs. CIT 59 ITR 718 and M. A. Jabbar Vs. CIT 68 ITR 493, and of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in G. Venkata Bhooma Reddy Vs. CIT 43 ITR 100. The courts have held that there is a distinction between payments made for acquiring a capital asset and therefore capital expenditure and payment for securing raw material and therefore revenue expenditure. Enduring benefit: As highlighted above in Para 5.3, KRSP…