Smt Dayawanti v. CIT

75 Taxmann.com 308High Court2016#779 most cited

What is Smt Dayawanti v. CIT authority for?

Additions to income based on statements recorded under section 132(4) during a search are valid, and such statements possess evidentiary value even if later retracted. Assessments made under section 153A, relying on these statements, are valid if completed within the prescribed time limits.

131

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Smt Dayawanti v. CIT · Smt Dayawanti vs CIT · 75 Taxmann.com 308 · section 132(4) statement · section 153A assessment · retracted statement · evidentiary value · additions based on search statement · time limit for search assessment · validity of assessment

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Smt Dayawanti v. CIT