Smt Dayawanti v. CIT
75 Taxmann.com 308High Court2016#778 most cited
What is Smt Dayawanti v. CIT authority for?
Additions to income based on statements recorded under section 132(4) during a search are valid, and such statements possess evidentiary value even if later retracted. Assessments made under section 153A, relying on these statements, are valid if completed within the prescribed time limits.
131
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.
Also referred to as
Smt Dayawanti v. CIT · Smt Dayawanti vs CIT · 75 Taxmann.com 308 · section 132(4) statement · section 153A assessment · retracted statement · evidentiary value · additions based on search statement · time limit for search assessment · validity of assessment
Also reported as
245 Taxmann 293
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing Smt Dayawanti v. CIT
Showing 1–20 of 131 · Page 1 of 7