SAP Labs India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT

44 SOT 156Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2011#1114 most cited

What is SAP Labs India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT authority for?

Foreign exchange fluctuation gains or losses are operational in nature and must be included in the computation of the operating margin for both the assessee and comparable companies when determining the Arm's Length Price.

100

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2012 to 2022.

Also referred to as

SAP Labs India v ACIT · 44 SOT 156 · 6 ITR (Trib) 81 · foreign exchange fluctuation gain loss · operating margin computation · Arm's Length Price · transfer pricing adjustment · operational income · comparable companies · section 92C(2) · associated enterprises · TNMM

Also reported as

6 ITR (Trib) 81

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing SAP Labs India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT

Indigra Exports Pvt. Limited, Bangalore vs. DCIT, Bangalore

Appeal of the Revenue is dismissed whereas appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 309/BANG/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Nov 2015AY 2010-11

Bench: Smt. Asha Vijayaraghavan & Shri. Abraham P. Georgei.T(Tp).A No.309/Bang/2015 (Assessment Year : 2010-11) Indigra Exports P. Ltd, 46, 2Nd Floor, Cc Villa, Ejipura Main Road, Viveknagar Post, Bangalore 560095 .. Appellant Pan : Aaaci3513M V. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle -11(4), Bangalore .. Respondent I.T(Tp).A No.193/Bang/2015 (Assessment Year : 2010-11) (By The Revenue) Assessee By : Shri. C. J. Brito, Ca Revenue By : Shri. Sanjay Kumar, Cit-Iii Heard On : 13.10.2015 Pronounced On : 10.11.2015 O R D E R Per Abraham P. George: These Are Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue Respectively Against An Assessment Order Dt.25.02.2014 Passed Pursuant To Directions Of Drp U/S.144C Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’ In Short).

For Appellant: Shri. C. J. Brito, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Sanjay Kumar, CIT-III
Section 144C

…transaction though they may form part of the gain/loss of the enterprise and therefore they should be excluded while determining operating cost. On the above issue we find that the Bangalore Bench of ITAT in the case of Sap Labs India (P) Ltd. Vs. ACIT (2011) 44 SOT 156 (Bang.) has taken the view that Foreign Exchange Fluctuation gains are required to be added to operating revenue. Following the same, the AO is directed to accept the claim of the Assessee in this regard. As far as provision for bad debts are concerned, the TPO has accepted that the same would be part of operating expenses provided the same is inc…

M/S Biesse Manufacturing Company Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Asst.C.I.T., Bangalore

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for Assessment Year 2010-11 is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 97/BANG/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Nov 2015AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijaypal Rao & Shri Jason P. Boazi.T.(T.P.)A. No.97/Bang/2015 (Assessment Year : 2010-11) M/S. Biesse Manufacturing Co. Vs. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Pvt. Ltd., Tax, Sy.No.32, No.469, Jakkasandra Village, Circle 2(1)(1), Sondekappa Road, Nelamangala Taluk, Bengaluru-1. Bengaluru Ruraldistrict-562 123 Pan Aaccb 7928D Appellant Respondent. I.T.(T.P.)A. No.493/Bang/2015 (Assessment Year : 2010-11) (By Revenue) Assessee : Shri K.K. Chythanya, Advocate. Revenue By : Shri Ganapati R Bhat,Cit-Iii (D.R) Date Of Hearing : 10.09.2015. Date Of Pronouncement : 6.11.2015. O R D E R Per Shri Jason P. Boaz, A.M. : These Are Cross Appeals, One By The Assessee & The Other By Revenue, Directed Against The Final Order Of Assessment For Assessment Year 2010-11 Passed Under Section 143(3) Rws 144C(13) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short 'The Act') Vide Order Dt.31.12.2014, In Pursuance Of The Directions Issued By The Dispute Resolution Panel (‘Drp’) Under Section 144C(5) Of The Act Dt.21.11.2014. 2. The Facts Of The Case, Briefly, Are As Under :- 2.1 The Assessee Company Is Engaged In The Manufacturing & Trading Of Wood Working Machinery, Spare Parts & Tools & Also Provides Software Testing, Technical Design & Marketing Services To Its Parent Company, Biesse Spa, Italy. The Assessee

For Appellant: Shri K.K. Chythanya, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ganapati R Bhat,CIT-III (D.R)
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 92C

…NXP Semi Conductors India Pvt. Ltd. in IT(TP)A No.1662/Bang/2014 dt.12.8.2015 which has followed the decisions of earlier co-ordinate bench of this Tribunal in the case of Triology E-Business Software India Pvt. Ltd. (supra) and Sap Labs India (P) Ltd. (2011) 44 SOT 156 (Bang). 16.3 We have heard the rival contentions and perused and carefully considered the material on record; including the judicial decisions cited and placed reliance upon. We observe that it has not been disputed that the foreign exchange gain/loss has arisen as a consequence of the realization of the consideration in the course of business ope…

DCIT vs. M/S Electronics for Imaging India Pvt. Ltd

In the result, appeal of the Revenue and cross objection of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 876/BANG/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Sept 2015AY 2004-05

Bench: Smt. Asha Vijayaraghavan & Shri. Abraham P. Georgei.T(Tp).A No.876/Bang/2013 (Assessment Year : 2004-05) Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle 11(3), Bangalore ..Appellant V. M/S. Electronics For Imaging India P. Ltd, Kalyani Platina, 4Th Floor, Block –I, 24, Epip Zone, Phase –Ii, Whitefield, Bangalore 560 066 ..Respondent Pan : Aaacg6053E Cross Objection No.167/Bang/2015 I.T(Tp).A No.876/Bang/2013 (Assessment Year : 2004-05) (By The Assessee) Assessee By : Shri. Padam Chand Khindha, Ca Revenue By : Dr. P. K. Srihari, Addl. Cit Heard On : 08.09.2015 Pronounced On : 30.09.2015 O R D E R Per Abraham P. George:

For Appellant: Shri. Padam Chand Khindha, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. K. Srihari, Addl. CIT
Section 92C

…nd liabilities. These causes and factors were operating in nature, as per paragraph 134 on page 46 of OECD Draft Guidelines on Transactional Profit Methods. Reliance was placed on the decision of the Bengaluru bench of the hon’ble ITAT in the case of Sap Labs 6 ITR (Trib) 81, where it was held that foreign exchange gain needed to be considered as operating in nature while determining the ALP.” Considering the nature of activities of assessee and the nature of revenues earned by it from software development activities rendered abroad, we are of the opinion that the foreign exchange gain could have been construed…