SAP Labs India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT

44 SOT 156Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2011#1114 most cited

What is SAP Labs India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT authority for?

Foreign exchange fluctuation gains or losses are operational in nature and must be included in the computation of the operating margin for both the assessee and comparable companies when determining the Arm's Length Price.

100

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2012 to 2022.

Also referred to as

SAP Labs India v ACIT · 44 SOT 156 · 6 ITR (Trib) 81 · foreign exchange fluctuation gain loss · operating margin computation · Arm's Length Price · transfer pricing adjustment · operational income · comparable companies · section 92C(2) · associated enterprises · TNMM

Also reported as

6 ITR (Trib) 81

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing SAP Labs India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT

Arctern Consulting Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 352/BANG/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore11 Oct 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri B. R. Baskaranit(Tp)A No.352/Bang/2017 Assessment Year : 2012-13 M/S. Arctern Consulting Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Embassy Tech Village, Income-Tax, Tower 2B Hibiscus, 5Th Floor, Circle – 1(1)(2), Deverabeesanahalli, Bengaluru. Bengaluru – 560 037. Pan : Aaeca 9113 F Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. T. Suryanarayana, Advocate Revenue By : Shri. Pradeep Kumar, Cit-Dr(Itat)(Bengaluru) Date Of Hearing : 09.10.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 15.10.2019 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri. T. Suryanarayana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Pradeep Kumar, CIT-DR(ITAT)(Bengaluru)
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 92

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N. V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI B. R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT(TP)A No.352/Bang/2017 Assessment year : 2012-13 M/s. Arctern Consulting Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Embassy Tech Village, Income-tax, Tower 2B Hibiscus, 5th Floor, Circle – 1(1)(2), Deverabeesanahalli, Bengaluru. Bengaluru – 560 037. PAN : AAECA 9113 F APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. T. Suryanarayana, Advocate Revenue by : Shri. Pradeep Kumar, CIT-DR(ITAT)(Bengaluru) Date of hearing : 09.10.2019 Date of Pronouncement : 15.10.2019 O R D E R Per N.…

M/S Ocwen Financial Solutions Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax Special Range-5, Bangalore

In the result, the assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2014-15 is partly allowed

ITA 130/BANG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore07 Aug 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Jason P Boaz & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleit(Tp)A No.130/Bang/2019 Assessment Years : 2014-15 M/S. Ocwen Financial Vs. Joint Commissioner Of Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Income-Tax, Pritech Park, Block 12, Unit 2, Special Range-5, 5B & 6A Floors, Bellandur Bengaluru. Village, Sarjapur Marathahalli Ring Road, Bengaluru – 560 103. Pan : Aaaco 7914 J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Chavali Narayan, Ca Revenue By : Shri. K. Devarathna Kumar, Jt.Cit Date Of Hearing : 13.06.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 07.08.2019 O R D E R Per Jason P Boaz: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Final Order Of Assessment Dated 27.11.2018 For Assessment Year 2014-15 Passed Under Section 143(3) R.W.S. 144C(13) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short ‘The Act’); Pursuant To The Directions Issued By The Dispute Resolution Panel – 3, Mumbai Under Section 144C(5) Of The Act On 30.07.2018. 2. Briefly Stated, The Facts Of The Case Are As Under:-

For Appellant: Shri. Chavali Narayan, CAFor Respondent: Shri. K. Devarathna Kumar, Jt.CIT
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 154Section 92C

…nue/ cost. In the following decisions also (filed in the paper book by the assessee), it has been held that foreign exchange fluctuation cannot be excluded from the computation of the operating margin of the assessee company: SAP Labs India P. Ltd. Vs. ACIT - 44 SOT 156 (bang) 1. Prakash I Shah reported in (2008) 115 ITD 167 (Mum) 2. (SB) Smt. Sujata Grover Vs. Dy. CIT (2002) 74 TTJ (Del) 347 3. M/ s. S. Narendra Vs. Addl.CIT - ITA No.6839/ Mum/ 4. 2012 -Mumbai Tribunal M/ s. Mercedes Benz Research & development India Pvt. 5. Ltd. Vs. DCIT (IT/ TP A.No.1222/ Bang/ 2011 - Bangalore Tribunal M/ s. Trilogy E-Busines…