Rajmandir Estate Pvt. Ltd. v. Pr. CIT

70 Taxmann.com 124High Court2016#1304 most cited

What is Rajmandir Estate Pvt. Ltd. v. Pr. CIT authority for?

Under Section 68, the assessee's onus to prove cash credits, such as share application money, is not discharged merely by providing investor addresses and PANs. The assessee must also establish the creditworthiness and capacity of the investors and the genuineness of the transactions, especially when these are doubted by the Assessing Officer.

87

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Rajmandir Estate Pvt. Ltd. · Section 68 · cash credit · share application money · onus of assessee · creditworthiness of creditor · genuineness of transaction · lack of enquiry · erroneous and prejudicial · Section 263

Sections most often in play

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 68Section 115JBSection 132

Issues it is cited on

section 61principal officermalabar industrialcreditworthiness of the creditorsection 144apaper companynon application of mindshare application moneylack of enquirybeneficial ownererroneous and prejudicialborrowed satisfaction

Judgments citing Rajmandir Estate Pvt. Ltd. v. Pr. CIT

M/S Suraj Pulses Pvt.Ltd., Delhi vs. Pr. CIT-8, New Delhi

In the result, the appeals of the Assessees are allowed

ITA 3009/DEL/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Jul 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: S/Shri Shantanu Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Shri H.K. Choudhary, CIT-D.R
Section 133(6)Section 147Section 148Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “G” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.3009 & 3010/DEL/2017 Assessment Year: 2007-08 & 2008-09 Suraj Pulses Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Pr.CIT-8, 4062-630, Naya Bazar, New Delhi. Delhi. TAN/PAN: AAKCS4913P (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No.3011/DEL/2017 Assessment Year: 2007-08 Suraj Buildmart India Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Pr.CIT-8, 4062-630, Naya Bazar, New Delhi. Delhi. TAN/PAN: AAKCS3598L (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No.3012/DEL/2017 Assessment Year: 2009-10 Suraj Pulses Processors Pvt. Vs. Pr.CIT-8, Lt…

Rutvi Oilfields Services Pvt Ltd, Gurgaon vs. Pr. CIT, Gurgaon

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3291/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Jun 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms Suchitra Kamble & Dr. B. R. R. Kumar

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 263Section 40A(2)(b)

…ITA No. 3291/Del/2019 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: ‘F’ NEW DELHI BEFORE MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. B. R. R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 3291/DEL/2019 (A.Y 2014-15) (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) M/s Rutvi Oilfields Services Pvt. Vs Principal Commissioner of Ltd. Income Tax, Gurgaon 327/3, Prem Nagar, HSIIDC Bldg., Vanijya Opposite Haryana Roadways, Nikunj, Gurgaon – 122022 Udyog Vihar, Phase –V, Haryana Gurgaon – 122 016 AAECR0637B Haryana (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by Sh. K. Sampath, Advocate; Respondent by Ms. Parmita M. Biswas, [CIT] – D.R. Date o…

ITO, New Delhi vs. M/S. Elative Building Solutions Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 2498/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Mar 2021AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Sudesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Jagdish Singh, Sr. DR

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : B : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2012-13 ITO, Vs Elative Building Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Ward-8(2), (Formerly M/s Maiden Building CR Building, Solution Pvt. Ltd.), New Delhi. B-5, Nand Ram Park, Bhagat Enclave, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi. PAN: AAHCM7197A (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Sudesh Garg, Advocate Revenue by : Shri Jagdish Singh, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 09.02.2021 Date of Pronouncement : 24.03.2021 ORDER PER R.K. PANDA, AM: This appeal filed by the Revenue is direct…

M/S.Srl Diagnostics Private Limited, Mumbai vs. Principal Commissioner Income Tax-7, Mumbai

Accordingly, the grounds raised by assessee are allowed

ITA 1528/MUM/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Jan 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Am & Shri R. L. Negi, Am आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 1528/Mum/2018 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14)

For Appellant: Shri V. Sridharan & Shri SFor Respondent: Shri Anand Mohan, DR
Section 14ASection 263Section 37

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, AM & SHRI R. L. NEGI, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 1528/Mum/2018 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) PCIT-7, M/s SRL Diagnostics Pvt. Room No. 315, 3rd floor, Ltd. Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. बिधम/ Piramal Tower, Annexe, Road, Mumbai-400 020 Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Vs. Lower Parel, Mumbai-400 013 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ PAN No. AAACT9117E (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : अपीलाथीकीओरसे/ Appellant : Shri V. Sridharan & Shri S. Sriram, ARs by प्रत्यथीकीओरसे/Respondentby : Shri Anand Mohan, DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/ : 18.11.2020 D…

Essar Capital Ltd, Mumbai vs. Pr CIT 6, Mumbai

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3759/MUM/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Jan 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Ram Lal Negiassessment Year: 2012-13 M/S. Vajresh Consultants Prcit 6, Ltd. (Earlier Known As Aayakar Bhavan, Essar Capital Ltd.), Mumbai - 400020 Vs. 40-B, Ridge Road, Malabar Hill, Mumbai – 400 006 Pan: Aabce 7257R (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee By : Shri Nishant Thakkar, A.R. & Shri Hiten Chande, A.R. Revenue By : Shri R. Manjunatha Swamy, D.R. Date Of Hearing : 23.10.2020 Date Of Pronouncement : 08.01.2021 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Nishant Thakkar, A.R. &For Respondent: Shri R. Manjunatha Swamy, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “E”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI RAM LAL NEGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/s. Vajresh Consultants PrCIT 6, Ltd. (Earlier known as Aayakar Bhavan, Essar Capital Ltd.), Mumbai - 400020 Vs. 40-B, Ridge Road, Malabar Hill, Mumbai – 400 006 PAN: AABCE 7257R (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Assessee by : Shri Nishant Thakkar, A.R. & Shri Hiten Chande, A.R. Revenue by : Shri R. Manjunatha Swamy, D.R. Date of Hearing : 23.10.2020 Date of Pronouncement : 08.01.2021 O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member: The p…

Shri Gurvinder Singh Suri, New Delhi vs. Pr CIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2644/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 May 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Sainidr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 2644/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Gurvinder Singh Suri, Vs Pr. Commissioner Of Income C/O M/S Rra Taxindia, Tax (Central)-1, D-28, South Extension, Part-I, New Delhi New Delhi-110049 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaps8291D Assessee By : Sh. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. Revenue By : Smt. Sushma Singh, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 02.03.2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 13.05.2020

For Appellant: Sh. Rakesh Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Smt. Sushma Singh, CIT DR
Section 119Section 263Section 263(1)Section 57

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES ‘F’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. Bhavnesh Saini, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member ITA No. 2644/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Gurvinder Singh Suri, Vs Pr. Commissioner of Income C/o M/s RRA Taxindia, Tax (Central)-1, D-28, South Extension, Part-I, New Delhi New Delhi-110049 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AAAPS8291D Assessee by : Sh. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. Revenue by : Smt. Sushma Singh, CIT DR Date of Hearing: 02.03.2020 Date of Pronouncement: 13.05.2020 ORDER Per Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Accountant Member: The present appeal has been filed by the ass…

Blooming Tradelink (P) Ltd., Kolkata vs. ITO, Ward - 10(1), Kolkata

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 2691/KOL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Feb 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am]

Section 133(6)Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अधीकरण, "यायपीठ – “C” कोलकाता, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH: KOLKATA (सम" "ी ए.ट". वक", "या"यक सद"य एवं डॉ ए.एल. सैनी, लेखा सद"य) [Before Shri A. T. Varkey, JM & Dr. A.L. Saini, AM] I.T.A. No. 2691/Kol/2018 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Blooming Tradelink Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer, Ward-10(1), Kolkata (PAN: AAECB5584F) Appellant Respondent For the Appellant Shri Subash Agarwal, Advocate For the Respondent Shri Supriyo Pal, JCIT, DR Date of Hearing 04.02.2020 Date of Pronouncement 28.02.2020 ORDER Per Shri A.T.Varkey, JM: This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the…

M/S K R Construction, Mumbai vs. Pr CIT Central-3, Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 7615/MUM/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri G. Manjunathak.R.Construction Vs. Principal Commissioner Of Basement, Hinal Residency Income Tax-Central-3 19Th Floor Datta Mandir Road Dahanukar Wadi Air India Building Kandivali(W) Nariman Point Mumbai-400 067 Mumbai-400 021

Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “H”, BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER K.R.Construction Vs. Principal Commissioner of Basement, Hinal Residency Income Tax-Central-3 19th Floor Datta Mandir Road Dahanukar Wadi Air India Building Kandivali(W) Nariman Point Mumbai-400 067 Mumbai-400 021 PAN/GIR No.AANFK0144N Appellant) .. Respondent) Revenue by Shri Rajeev Harit, CIT-DR Assessee by Shri Naresh Jain, AR Date of Hearing 11/02/2020 Date of Pronouncement 28/02/2020 आदेश आदेश / O R D E R आदेश आदेश PER G.MANJUNATHA (A.M): This appeal filed by the…

Klaxon Trading (P) Ltd., New Delhi vs. Pr. CIT, Central- 3, New Delhi

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 7265/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jan 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms Suchitra Kamble & Shri Prashant Maharishii.T.A. No. 7265/Del/2017 (A.Y 2013-14) M/S Klaxon Trading (P.) Ltd., Vs Pcit, Warehouse A-97B, Khasra Central – 3, No.50/4, New Delhi Behind Friends Dharam Kanta Shahbad Daulatpur, New Delhi – 110 042 (Pan : Aaack 3487 E) (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 263

…1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: ‘D’ NEW DELHI BEFORE MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 7265/DEL/2017 (A.Y 2013-14) M/s Klaxon Trading (P.) Ltd., Vs PCIT, Warehouse A-97B, Khasra Central – 3, No.50/4, New Delhi Behind Friends Dharam Kanta Shahbad Daulatpur, New Delhi – 110 042 (PAN : AAACK 3487 E) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by Sh. Rakesh Gupta & Sh. Somil Aggarwal, Adv. Respondent by Shri G. Johnson, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing 09.01.2020 Date of Pronouncement 27.01.2020 ORDER PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JM This appeal is filed…

Rajgul Ctrditnvest P.Ltd, New Delhi vs. Prcit, Delhi-7, New Delhi

In the result, the Appeal filed by the Assessee stands allowed

ITA 2519/DEL/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri O.P. Kant

For Appellant: Sh. Gautam Jain, Adv. &For Respondent: Smt. Sulekha Verma, CIT(DR)
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 44ASection 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “F”, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 2519/DEL/2019 A.Y. : 2009-10 RAJGUL CREDITNVEST P. LTD., PR. CIT, DELHI-7 474-75, AGGARWAL MILLENNIUM VS. NEW DELHI TOWER-II, NETAJI SUBHASH PLACE, PITAMPURA, NEW DELHI – 110 034 (PAN: AAACR5900M) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Assessee by : Sh. Gautam Jain, Adv. & Sh. Lalit Kumar, Adv. Department by : Smt. Sulekha Verma, CIT(DR) ORDER PER H.S. SIDHU : JM This Appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the Order dated 18/21-01-2019 passed by the Ld. Pr. Com…

Ashok Kumar Sinha, Ghaziabad vs. Prcit, Ghaziabad

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3615/DEL/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Aug 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N. K. Billaiya & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 133(6)Section 147Section 263

…1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: ‘A’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI N. K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 3615/DEL/2019 (A.Y. 2009-10) Ashok Kumar Sinha, Vs. Pr. CIT C-258, Govindpuram, 1st Floor, CGO Complex –I, Ghaziabad Hapur Road, PAN : AWKPS6166R Kamla Nehru Nagar Ghaziabad (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by Sh. Vinod Kumar Bindal, CA & Ms. Rinki Sharma, ITP Respondent by Sh. Sanjay Goyal, CIT-DR Date of Hearing 30.07.2019 Date of Pronouncement 20.08.2019 ORDER PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JM This appeal is filed against the order dated 30.03.20…

T I Steels Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. Pr. CIT- 9, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2176/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Jul 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. H. S. Sidhudr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 2176/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 T.I. Steels Pvt. Ltd., Vs Income Tax Officer, H.No. 98A, Block-Af, Shalimar Ward-25(1), Bagh, New Delhi-110088 New Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabct9896R Assessee By : Sh. Mohit Sachdeva, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.07.2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 08.07.2019 Order Per B. R. R. Kumar:

For Appellant: Sh. Mohit Sachdeva, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR
Section 10CSection 119Section 143(3)Section 262Section 263Section 80I

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES ‘G’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. H. S. Sidhu, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member ITA No. 2176/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 T.I. Steels Pvt. Ltd., Vs Income Tax Officer, H.No. 98A, Block-AF, Shalimar Ward-25(1), Bagh, New Delhi-110088 New Delhi-110002 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AABCT9896R Assessee by : Sh. Mohit Sachdeva, Adv. Revenue by : Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR Date of Hearing: 04.07.2019 Date of Pronouncement: 08.07.2019 ORDER Per B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member: The assessee has raised following effective grounds of appeal: ”1. That…

ITO, Ward-10(4), Kolkata vs. M/S Gateway Enclave Pvt.Ltd., Kolkata

In the result, appeal of Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2269/KOL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 May 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 68

…1 M/s. Gateway Enclave Pvt. Ltd., AY 2012-13 आयकर अपील"य अधीकरण, "यायपीठ – “C” कोलकाता, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH: KOLKATA (सम") "ी ऐ. ट". वक", "यायीक सद"य एवं डॉ. अजु"न लाल सैनी, लेखा सद"य) [Before Shri A. T. Varkey, JM & Dr. A. L. Saini, AM] I.T.A. No. 2269/Kol/2016 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Income-tax Officer, Wd-10(4), Vs. M/s. Gateway Enclave Pvt. Ltd. Kolkata. (PAN: AAECG 0052 F) Appellant Respondent Date of Hearing 12.02.2019 Date of Pronouncement 01.05.2019 For the Appellant Shri Shankar Halder, JCIT, Sr. DR For the Respondent Shri Manish Tiwari, FCA ORDER Per Shri A.T.Varkey…

Rajesh Kumar, Hisar vs. CIT, Hisar

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 3337/DEL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Mar 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kantassessment Year: 2008-09 Shri Rajesh Kumar, Vs. Cit, 1931, Gate No. 2, Behind Hisar M.G. Road, Hisar Pan :Aohpk1201L (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Manoj Kumar, Adv. Respondent By Smt. Sulekha Verma, Cit(Dr)

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 263(1)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: “F”, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2008-09 Shri Rajesh Kumar, Vs. CIT, 1931, Gate No. 2, Behind Hisar M.G. Road, Hisar PAN :AOHPK1201L (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Shri Manoj Kumar, Adv. Respondent by Smt. Sulekha Verma, CIT(DR) Date of hearing 05.03.2019 Date of pronouncement 29.03.2019 ORDER PER O.P. KANT, A.M.: This appeal by the assessee is directed against order dated 26/03/2013 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax, Hisar (in short ‘the Ld. CIT’ ) under section…

M/S Abhijeet Enterprise Ltd., Kolkata vs. ITO, Ward 2(2), Kolkata

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 308/KOL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata27 Mar 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 68

…1 Abhijeet Enterprise Ltd. , AY 2013-14 आयकर अपील"य अधीकरण, "यायपीठ – “C” कोलकाता, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH: KOLKATA (सम") "ी ऐ. ट". वक", "यायीक सद"य एवं डॉ. अजु"न लाल सैनी, लेखा सद"य) [Before Shri A. T. Varkey, JM & Dr. A. L. Saini, AM] I.T.A. No. 308/Kol/2017 Assessment Years: 2013-14 M/s. Abhijeet Enterprise Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer, Wd-2(2), Kolkata (PAN: AAJCA4713C) Appellant Respondent For the Appellant Shri M. D. Shah, AR For the Respondent Shri P. K. Srihari, CIT, DR Date of Hearing 08.03.2019 Date of Pronouncement 27.03.2019 ORDER Per Shri A.T.Varkey, JM This appeal of t…

ITO, Ward-10(4), Kolkata vs. M/S Positive Properties Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata

In the result, appeal of revenue is dismissed

ITA 2274/KOL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Jan 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 68

…1 Positive Properties Pvt. Ltd., AY 2012-13 आयकर अपील"य अधीकरण, "यायपीठ – “B” कोलकाता, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH: KOLKATA (सम") "ी ऐ. ट". वक", "यायीक सद"य एवं डॉ. अजु"न लाल सैनी, लेखा सद"य) [Before Shri A. T. Varkey, JM & Dr. A. L. Saini, AM] I.T.A. No. 2274/Kol/2016 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Income-tax Officer, Wd-10(4), Vs. M/s. Positive Properties Pvt. Ltd. Kolkata. (PAN: AAFCP7164E) Appellant Respondent Date of Hearing 01.01.2019 Date of Pronouncement 09.01.2019 For the Appellant Shri Pijush Mukherjee, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR For the Respondent Shri Manish Tiwari, AR ORDER Per Shri A.T.V…

ITO, Ward-10(1), Kolkata vs. M/S Sunglow Dealcom Private Limited, Kolkata

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2178/KOL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi) Assessment Year: 2012-13 Income Tax Officer, Ward-10(1), Kolkata.……......……......………………..……….…….…............Appellant Vs. M/S. Sunglow Dealcom Private Limited……..........…………..……………….…...……..….…......Respondent 3Rd Floor 89, N.S. Road Kolkata – 700 001 [Pan : Aadcs 7562 F]

Section 133(6)Section 250Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA ‘D’ BENCH, KOLKATA (Before Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Accountant Member & Sri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Judicial Member) Assessment Year: 2012-13 Income Tax Officer, Ward-10(1), Kolkata.……......……......………………..……….…….…............Appellant Vs. M/s. Sunglow Dealcom Private Limited……..........…………..……………….…...……..….…......Respondent 3rd Floor 89, N.S. Road Kolkata – 700 001 [PAN : AADCS 7562 F] Appearances by: Shri S.M. Surana, Advocate, appeared on behalf of the assessee. Shri C.J. Singh, Sr. D/R. appearing on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing : Octobe…

Gumpro Drilling Fluids Private Limited, Mumbai vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax - 15, Mumbai

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2868/MUM/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2013-14 Gumpro Drilling Fluids Vs Pr. Cit-15, Private Limited, Room No.517, 5Th Floor, Opp. Karma Stambha, Aayakar Bhavan, Hazarat Compound, Lbs M. K. Road, Marg, Vikhroli (West), Mumbai-400020 Mumbai-400083 ("नधा"रती /Assessee) (राज"व /Revenue) Pan. No.Aadcg2319N "नधा"रती क" ओर से / Assessee By Shri Ashok J. Patil राज"व क" ओर से / Revenue By Shri L.K.S. Dahiya Cit-Dr

Section 120Section 144ASection 263Section 35

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, मुंबई "यायपीठ,जी,मुंबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES “G”, MUMBAI "ी जो"ग"दर "संह, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी रिमत कोचर, लेखा सद"य, के सम" Before Shri Joginder Singh, Judicial Member, and Shri Ramit Kochar, Accountant Member Assessment Year: 2013-14 Gumpro Drilling Fluids vs Pr. CIT-15, Private Limited, Room No.517, 5th Floor, Opp. Karma Stambha, Aayakar Bhavan, Hazarat Compound, LBS M. K. Road, Marg, Vikhroli (West), Mumbai-400020 Mumbai-400083 ("नधा"रती /Assessee) (राज"व /Revenue) PAN. No.AADCG2319N "नधा"रती क" ओर से / Assessee by Shri Ashok J. Patil राज"व क" ओर से / Revenue b…

ACIT, Central Circle- 26, New Delhi vs. Gd Foods Manufacturing (India) Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1470/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

…IT Vs. Nova Promoters and Finlease (P) Ltd. (2012) 342 ITR 169 (Del) and CIT Vs. N.R.portfolio Pvt. Ltd.(2014) 264 CTR 258 (Del) are relied upon. Further, the judgement of Hon'ble Kolkata High Court in the case of Rajmandir Estate Pvt. Ltd. (2016) reported in 70 Taxmann.com 124 (Cat) and the judgement of ITAT, 'D' Bench, Mumbai in ITA no.l835/Mum/2014 dated 24.8.2016 in the case of Royal Rich Developers Pvt. Ltd. are also relied upon. In view of the facts of the case, I am of the considered view that this is not sufficient to discharge the onus cast on the appellant as contemplated u/s.68 of the Act just giving a…

ACIT, Central Circle- 26, New Delhi vs. Gd Foods Manufacturing (India) Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1469/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

…IT Vs. Nova Promoters and Finlease (P) Ltd. (2012) 342 ITR 169 (Del) and CIT Vs. N.R.portfolio Pvt. Ltd.(2014) 264 CTR 258 (Del) are relied upon. Further, the judgement of Hon'ble Kolkata High Court in the case of Rajmandir Estate Pvt. Ltd. (2016) reported in 70 Taxmann.com 124 (Cat) and the judgement of ITAT, 'D' Bench, Mumbai in ITA no.l835/Mum/2014 dated 24.8.2016 in the case of Royal Rich Developers Pvt. Ltd. are also relied upon. In view of the facts of the case, I am of the considered view that this is not sufficient to discharge the onus cast on the appellant as contemplated u/s.68 of the Act just giving a…