Principal Commissioner of Income-tax--8 Mumbai v. Sumatichand Tolamal Gouti

111 Taxmann.com 287Supreme Court of India2019#4277 most cited

What is Principal Commissioner of Income-tax--8 Mumbai v. Sumatichand Tolamal Gouti authority for?

A revisional order under section 263 is not sustainable if the Assessing Officer has made adequate inquiries during the assessment proceedings, even if those inquiries are not explicitly detailed in the assessment order. The adequacy of the inquiry is paramount.

27

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Sumatichand Tolamal Gouti · section 263 · revisionary power · assessing officer inquiry · adequate enquiry · prejudicial to interest of revenue · Principal Commissioner of Income-tax · reassessment · assessment procedure

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Principal Commissioner of Income-tax--8 Mumbai v. Sumatichand Tolamal Gouti

Pramukh Aranya Developers, Junagadh vs. Pr. CIT, Rajkot-1, Rajkot

In the result, the appeal of the assessee (in ITA No

ITA 372/RJT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot28 Apr 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.372 /Rjt/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: (2018-19) M/S. Pramukh Aranya Developers Office No. 5, First Floor, Cit Centre, Opp. New Collector Officer, B/H. Sardar Baug, Junagadh - 362001 The Pr. Cit-1, Vs. Aayakar Bhawan, Race Course Ring Road, Rajkot - 360001 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaofp3393F (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) निर्धारिती की ओर से/Appellant By राजस्व की प्रत्यर्थी ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld. Ar : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld.Cit (Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement Per Dr. A. L. Saini, Am: : 04/02/2025 : 28/04/2025 आदेश / Order By Way Of This Appeal, The Assessee Has Challenged The Correctness Of The Order Dated 30.03.2024, Passed By The Learned Principal Commissioner Of Income- Tax (In Short “Ld Pcit"), Under Section 263 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As 'The Act'), For The Assessment Year2018-19.Grievances Raised By The Assessee, Which, Being Interconnected, Will Be Taken Up Together, Are As Follows: M/S. Pramukh Aranya Developers V. Pcit

For Respondent: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld. AR
Section 143(3)Section 22Section 23(5)Section 263

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, राजकोट न्यायपीठ, राजकोट । IN THE INCOMETAXAPPELLATE TRIBUNAL RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT BEFORE DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER And SHRI DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.372 /RJT/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: (2018-19) M/s. Pramukh Aranya Developers Office No. 5, First Floor, Cit Centre, Opp. New Collector Officer, B/h. Sardar Baug, Junagadh - 362001 The Pr. CIT-1, Vs. Aayakar Bhawan, Race Course Ring Road, Rajkot - 360001 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AAOFP3393F (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) निर्धारिती की ओर से/Appellant by राजस्व की प्रत्…

Principal Commissioner of Income-tax--8 Mumbai v. Sumatichand Tolamal Gouti (111 Taxmann.com 287) — Cited in 27 Judgments | BharatTax