PRAMUKH ARANYA DEVELOPERS,JUNAGADH vs. PR. CIT, RAJKOT-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

PDF · subscribers
ITA 372/RJT/2024Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot28 April 2025AY 2018-1916 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the PCIT's order under Section 263 was unsustainable. The AO's assessment order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of revenue, as the AO had made necessary inquiries and taken a plausible view.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a partnership firm, filed a return declaring Nil income. The assessment was completed accepting the returned income. The Principal Commissioner of Income-tax (PCIT) initiated revision proceedings under Section 263, alleging the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct proper inquiry regarding notional rental income on unsold flats and interest on negative capital of partners.

What were the issues?

Whether the PCIT correctly invoked Section 263 when the AO's assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue due to lack of inquiry.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 263,Section 23(5),Section 22

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(7)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Before: DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI & SHRI DINESH MOHAN SINHA

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld. AR, Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld.CIT (DR)
For Respondent: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld. AR, Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld.CIT (DR)

आदेश क� ��त*ल+प अ,े+षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent. 3. संबं.धत आयकर आयु/त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु/त(अपील) / The CIT(A) / Pr.CIT, Rajko-1. 5. +वभागीय ��त�न.ध, आयकर अपील�य अ.धकरण,राजोकट/DR,ITAT, Rajkot 6. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, स�या+पत ��त //True Copy//

More judgments on Section 263

All 13,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 263 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →