Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-2, Meerut v. Canara Bank Securities Ltd.

114 Taxmann.com 545Supreme Court of India2020#1992 most cited

What is Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-2, Meerut v. Canara Bank Securities Ltd. authority for?

Property held as stock-in-trade is not assessable under the head 'Income from House Property' (Section 23). An Assessing Officer's decision not to tax such income, when supported by inquiry, typically cannot be considered erroneous and prejudicial under Section 263.

57

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Canara Bank Securities · Section 263 · Section 23 · stock-in-trade · income from house property · erroneous and prejudicial · inadequate inquiry · PCIT revision · 114 Taxmann.com 545

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-2, Meerut v. Canara Bank Securities Ltd.

Satishbhai Mohanbhai Zalavadia, Na vs. Ari, Vs.the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajkot-1, Rajkot

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 122/RJT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot10 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. A.L. Saini, Am & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.122/Rjt/2022 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Physical He Aring) Satishbhai Mohanbhai Zalavadia, The Pr. Cit – 1, Vs. 2622, Sarvoday Park, Khundh Rajkot Khundh, Chikhli, Navsari - 396521 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Acnpp0527F (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Rajendra Singhal, Ar Respondent By : Shri Shramdeep Sinha, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : Heard On 23/07/2024 & Refix For Clarification On 24.04.2025

For Appellant: Shri Rajendra Singhal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Shramdeep Sinha, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT BEFORE DR. A.L. SAINI, AM & SHRI DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JM आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.122/RJT/2022 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Physical He aring) Satishbhai Mohanbhai Zalavadia, The Pr. CIT – 1, Vs. 2622, Sarvoday Park, Khundh Rajkot Khundh, Chikhli, Navsari - 396521 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: ACNPP0527F (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Rajendra Singhal, AR Respondent by : Shri Shramdeep Sinha, CIT-DR Date of Hearing : Heard on 23/07/2024 & Refix for clarification on 24.04.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 10/06/2025 आदेश / O R D E…

Pramukh Aranya Developers, Junagadh vs. Pr. CIT, Rajkot-1, Rajkot

In the result, the appeal of the assessee (in ITA No

ITA 372/RJT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot28 Apr 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.372 /Rjt/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: (2018-19) M/S. Pramukh Aranya Developers Office No. 5, First Floor, Cit Centre, Opp. New Collector Officer, B/H. Sardar Baug, Junagadh - 362001 The Pr. Cit-1, Vs. Aayakar Bhawan, Race Course Ring Road, Rajkot - 360001 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaofp3393F (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) निर्धारिती की ओर से/Appellant By राजस्व की प्रत्यर्थी ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld. Ar : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld.Cit (Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement Per Dr. A. L. Saini, Am: : 04/02/2025 : 28/04/2025 आदेश / Order By Way Of This Appeal, The Assessee Has Challenged The Correctness Of The Order Dated 30.03.2024, Passed By The Learned Principal Commissioner Of Income- Tax (In Short “Ld Pcit"), Under Section 263 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As 'The Act'), For The Assessment Year2018-19.Grievances Raised By The Assessee, Which, Being Interconnected, Will Be Taken Up Together, Are As Follows: M/S. Pramukh Aranya Developers V. Pcit

For Respondent: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld. AR
Section 143(3)Section 22Section 23(5)Section 263

…not required to offer any 6|Page M/s. Pramukh Aranya Developers v. PCIT ITA No.372/Rjt/2024AY. 2018-19 property income from stock-in-trade. For that, Ld.Counsel relied on the judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Canara Bank Securities reported at 114 Taxmann.com 545 (SC).The Ld. Counsel therefore, submitted that the assessing officer conducted sufficient inquiry in respect of issue, pertaining to section 23 of the Act. The assessing officer, issued a notice under section 142(1) of the Act, which is placed in Paper Book Page No. 18 of assessee`s paper book. In response to that the assessee submitted i…

M\S. Lexico Ceramics, Rajkot vs. The Pr. CIT-1, Rajkot

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1/RJT/2023[2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Rajkot12 May 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalassessment Year : 2015-15 M/S Lexico Ceramics, C/O Kalpesh S. Doshi & Co., Vs Principal Commissioner Of Chartered Accountants, Income-Tax-1, 1006-09, The Spire-2, Near Sheetal Rajkot Park Brts Stop, 150 Ft. Ring Road, Rajkot-360005 Pan : Aaefl 8870 D अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ar Revenue By : Shri Shramdeep Sinha, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 19/04/2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 12/05/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Waseem Ahmed, Am :

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Shramdeep Sinha, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 263(1)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT (through web-based video conferencing platform) ] BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2015-15 M/s Lexico Ceramics, C/o Kalpesh S. Doshi & Co., Vs Principal Commissioner of Chartered Accountants, Income-tax-1, 1006-09, The Spire-2, Near Sheetal Rajkot Park BRTS Stop, 150 Ft. Ring Road, Rajkot-360005 PAN : AAEFL 8870 D अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Kalpesh Doshi, AR Revenue by : Shri Shramdeep Sinha, CIT-DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 19/04/2023 घो…

Shri Tulshibhai Polabhai Sakariya, Rajkot vs. The Pr. CIT-1, Rajkot

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is allowed

ITA 93/RJT/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot15 Feb 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 93/Rjt/2021 िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Year:2015-16 िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष" Shri Tulsibhai Polabhai Sakariya Vs. The Pr. C.I.T, 2-Bombay Housing Society, Rajkot-1, Meghdhara, University Road, Rajkot. Opp. G. K. Dholakiya, Rajkot

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Shramdeep Sinha, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 54F

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, राजकोट "यायपीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER And MS. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No. 93/Rjt/2021 िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Year:2015-16 िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष" Shri Tulsibhai Polabhai Sakariya Vs. The Pr. C.I.T, 2-Bombay Housing Society, Rajkot-1, Meghdhara, University Road, Rajkot. Opp. G. K. Dholakiya, Rajkot PAN: EEDPS9685N (Applicant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No. 94/Rjt/2021 िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Year:2015-16 िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष" Shri Khodabhai Polabhai Sakariya Vs. The Pr. C.I.T, Megh…