Pr. CIT v. Totagars Co-operative Sales Society

83 Taxmann.com 140High Court2017#256 most cited

What is Pr. CIT v. Totagars Co-operative Sales Society authority for?

Interest income earned by a co-operative society from deposits or investments made in a co-operative bank is not eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in view of Section 80P(4).

306

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Pr. CIT v. Totagars Co-operative Sales Society · 83 Taxmann.com 140 · Section 80P(2)(d) · Section 80P(4) · co-operative society interest deduction · interest from co-operative bank · deduction disallowance 80P · Totagars Karnataka High Court · investment income co-operative society

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Pr. CIT v. Totagars Co-operative Sales Society

Uti Employees Sai Samrudhi Co-Op Housing Society Ltd, Mumbai vs. Centralized Processing Unit Income Tax Dept. Bangalore, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2477/MUM/2022[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Dec 2022AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.2477/Mum/2022 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Years: 2019-20) Uti Employees Sai बिधम/ Centralized Processing Samrudhi Co-Op Housing Unit Income Tax Vs. Society Ltd. Department Bangalore- C/O Uti Amc Ltd. 560500. Uti Tower, Gn Block, Bkc Bandra East, Mumbai- 400051. स्थधयी लेखध सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aagts8239K (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Sachin Lopis Revenue By: Smt. Nayana K. Kumar सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 28/11/2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 05/12/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Aby T. Varkey, Jm: This Is An Appeal Preferred By The Appellant/Assessee Uti Employees Sai Samrudhi Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)/Nfac, Delhi Dated 25.07.2022 For The Assessment Year 2019-20. 2. Assessee Is A Co-Operative Housing Society, Registered Under The Maharashtra Co-Op Society Act 1960. The Society Was Formed By Employees & Nominees Of Unit Trust Of India (Government Entity). The Grounds Of Appeal Of The Assessee Is Against The Action Of The Ld. Cit(A) Confirming The Action Of Ao Not Allowing The Claim Of The Assessee On The Interest Income U/S 80P(2)(D) Of The Income Tax Act

For Appellant: Shri Sachin LopisFor Respondent: Smt. Nayana K. Kumar
Section 143(1)Section 80P(2)(d)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.2477/Mum/2022 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Years: 2019-20) UTI Employees Sai बिधम/ Centralized Processing Samrudhi Co-op Housing Unit Income Tax Vs. Society Ltd. Department Bangalore- C/o UTI AMC Ltd. 560500. UTI Tower, GN Block, BKC Bandra East, Mumbai- 400051. स्थधयी लेखध सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAGTS8239K (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) Assessee by: Shri Sachin Lopis Revenue by: Smt. Nayana K. Kumar सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing: 28/11/2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronou…

The Ikkaraiboluvampatti Paccs 33, Coimbatore vs. ITO, Ncw 4(2), Coimbatore

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 461/CHNY/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai02 Nov 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.461/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2017-18 M/S.Ikkaraiboluvampatti Paccs, V. The Income Tax Officer, 33, Rajaji Street, Non-Corporate Ward-4(2), Coimbatore. Coimbatore. [Pan: Aaaai 3699 A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By Mr.J.Saravanan, Adv. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.P.Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 19.10.2022 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 02.11.2022

For Respondent: Mr.P.Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ’सी’ "यायपीठ, चे"ई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI "ी वी. दुगा" राव, माननीय "ाियक सद" एवं "ी जी. मंजूनाथा, माननीय लेखा सद" के सम" BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.461/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2017-18 M/s.Ikkaraiboluvampatti PACCS, v. The Income Tax Officer, 33, Rajaji Street, Non-Corporate Ward-4(2), Coimbatore. Coimbatore. [PAN: AAAAI 3699 A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by Mr.J.Saravanan, Adv. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent by :…

Jilla Panchayat Na Karmacharioni Dhiran Ane Grahak Sahakari Mandali Ltd., Bhavanagar vs. The ACIT Circle-1, Bhavanagar

In the result appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 108/AHD/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad31 Oct 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.108/Ahd/2021 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year:2017-2018 Jilla Panchayat Na Karmacharioni Dhiran The A.C.I.T., Ane Grahak Sahakari Mandali Ltd., Vs. Circle-1, 0, Motibaug Road, Bhavnagar. Near Town Hall, Bhavnagar-364001. Pan: Aacaj3104B

For Appellant: Shri Parimalsinh B. Parmar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Atul Pandey, Sr. D.R
Section 234ASection 270ASection 56Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘’ SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.108/AHD/2021 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year:2017-2018 Jilla Panchayat Na Karmacharioni Dhiran The A.C.I.T., Ane Grahak Sahakari Mandali Ltd., Vs. Circle-1, 0, Motibaug Road, Bhavnagar. Near Town Hall, Bhavnagar-364001. PAN: AACAJ3104B (Applicant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Parimalsinh B. Parmar, A.R Revenue by : Shri Atul Pandey, Sr. D.R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date of Hearing : 12/10/2022 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 31/10/2022 आदेश/O R D E R PER…

The Juhu Vile Parle Development Co Operative Housing Association Ltd, Mumbai vs. Asst. Comm of Income Tax, Circle 25(3), Mumbai

In the result, both appeals by assessee are allowed

ITA 1835/MUM/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Sept 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar, Vice- & Shri Vikas Awasthyआअसं. 1834/मुं/2022 ("न.व .2017-18) आअसं. 1835/मुं/2022 ("न.व .2018-19) The Juhu Vile Parle Development Co-Operative Housing Association Ltd. Plot No.51, Jai Hind Recreation Club, N.S.Road, No.11, Vile Parle (W), Mumbai 400 056; Pan: Aabft-5293-P ...... अपीलाथ" /Appellant बनाम Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle-25(3), Kautlya, Bkc, Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051. ..... ""तवाद"/Respondent अपीलाथ" "वारा/ Appellant By : Shri Rajesh Shah ""तवाद" "वारा/Respondent By : Shri Tejinder Pal Singh सुनवाई क" "त"थ/ Date Of Hearing : 10/08/2022 घोषणा क" "त"थ/ Date Of Pronouncement : 29/09/2022 आदेश/ Order

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh ShahFor Respondent: Shri Tejinder Pal Singh
Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण मुंबई पीठ “ एच ” "ी "मोद कुमार, उपा"य" एवं "ी "वकास अव"थी, "या"यक सद"य के सम" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “ H”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT & SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आअसं. 1834/मुं/2022 ("न.व .2017-18) आअसं. 1835/मुं/2022 ("न.व .2018-19) The Juhu Vile Parle Development Co-operative Housing Association Ltd. Plot No.51, Jai Hind Recreation Club, N.S.Road, No.11, Vile Parle (W), Mumbai 400 056; PAN: AABFT-5293-P ...... अपीलाथ" /Appellant बनाम Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-25(3), Kautlya, BKC, Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051.…

The Juhu Vile Parle Development Co Operative Housing Association Ltd, Mumbai vs. Asst. Comm of Income Tax, Circle 25(3), Mumbai

In the result, both appeals by assessee are allowed

ITA 1834/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Sept 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar, Vice- & Shri Vikas Awasthyआअसं. 1834/मुं/2022 ("न.व .2017-18) आअसं. 1835/मुं/2022 ("न.व .2018-19) The Juhu Vile Parle Development Co-Operative Housing Association Ltd. Plot No.51, Jai Hind Recreation Club, N.S.Road, No.11, Vile Parle (W), Mumbai 400 056; Pan: Aabft-5293-P ...... अपीलाथ" /Appellant बनाम Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle-25(3), Kautlya, Bkc, Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051. ..... ""तवाद"/Respondent अपीलाथ" "वारा/ Appellant By : Shri Rajesh Shah ""तवाद" "वारा/Respondent By : Shri Tejinder Pal Singh सुनवाई क" "त"थ/ Date Of Hearing : 10/08/2022 घोषणा क" "त"थ/ Date Of Pronouncement : 29/09/2022 आदेश/ Order

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh ShahFor Respondent: Shri Tejinder Pal Singh
Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण मुंबई पीठ “ एच ” "ी "मोद कुमार, उपा"य" एवं "ी "वकास अव"थी, "या"यक सद"य के सम" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “ H”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT & SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आअसं. 1834/मुं/2022 ("न.व .2017-18) आअसं. 1835/मुं/2022 ("न.व .2018-19) The Juhu Vile Parle Development Co-operative Housing Association Ltd. Plot No.51, Jai Hind Recreation Club, N.S.Road, No.11, Vile Parle (W), Mumbai 400 056; PAN: AABFT-5293-P ...... अपीलाथ" /Appellant बनाम Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-25(3), Kautlya, BKC, Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051.…

The Ekta Co.Op. Credit Society Ltd., Mehsana vs. The Pr. CIT, Gandhinagar

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 562/AHD/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Us Is A Co-Operative Credit Society, Provide Credit Facility To Its Members By Giving Loan & Advances & Accepting Deposits From Members Of The Society. For The Assessment Year, 2014-15, The Assessee Field Its Return Of Income Was E-Filed On 26/11/2014 Declaring Total Income At Rs. Nil After Claiming Deduction Of Rs. 1,04,56,923/- U/S 80P Of The Act. The Return Was Processed U/S 143(1) & Then Scrutiny Assessment Was Completed By Making Addition On Account Of Interest Receipt Of Rs. 15,595/- & Addition Of Interest On Refund Received U/S 244A Of The Act Of Rs. 21,980/-. Thus Assessed The Total Income As Rs. 37,575/-.

For Appellant: Shri Sunil H. Talati, A.RFor Respondent: Shri James Kurian, CIT/D.R
Section 143(1)Section 244ASection 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD “B” BENCH Before: Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member And Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar, Judicial Member Assessment Year 2014-15 The Ekta Co-Operative The Pr.Commissioner Credit Society Ltd. At; of Income Tax, Sokhada, Taluka : Vs Gandhinagar Vijapur, District: (Respondent) Mehsana PAN No: AAAAT4874A (Appellant) Appellant by : Shri Sunil H. Talati, A.R. Respondent by : Shri James Kurian, CIT/D.R. Date of hearing : 17-08-2022 Date of pronouncement : 24-08-2022 आदेश/ORDER PER : T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:- The present appeal has been filed by the Assesse…

Shree Tuljabhavani Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit, Pune vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -5, Pune

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 254/PUN/2020[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Jul 2022AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.254/Pun/2020 िनधा"रणवष" /Assessment Year: 2014-15 Shree Tuljabhavani Nagari The Principal Commissioner Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit, Vs Of Income Tax - 5, Pune. 17/04, 103, Shri Tuljibhavani Plaza Mangalnagar, Wakad Road, Thergaon, Pune. Pan: Aadas 9902 P Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue Assessee By None. Revenue By Shri Arvind Desai – Dr Date Of Hearing 16/06/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 28/07/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr.Dipak P.Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld.Pr.Commissioner Of Income-Tax-5, Pune’S, Order Dated 08.01.2019For The Assessment Year 2014-15, Involving Proceedings Under Section 263(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax Has Erred In Passing The Order Which Is Without Jurisdiction & Bad In Law. Same May Please Be Cancelled. 2. Pr.Cit Has Erred In Alleging That Order U/S 143(3) Passed By Assessing Officer Is Erroneous In So Far As It Is Prejudicial To The Interest Of Revenue. Appellant Prays To Cancel The Same.

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 263(1)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “ए” "ायपीठ पुणेम"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, PUNE BEFORE SHRI S.S.GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं. / ITA No.254/PUN/2020 िनधा"रणवष" /Assessment Year: 2014-15 Shree Tuljabhavani Nagari The Principal Commissioner Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit, Vs of Income Tax - 5, Pune. 17/04, 103, Shri Tuljibhavani Plaza Mangalnagar, Wakad Road, Thergaon, Pune. PAN: AADAS 9902 P Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue Assessee by None. Revenue by Shri Arvind Desai – DR Date of hearing 16/06/2022 Date of pronouncement 28/07/2022 आदेश/ ORDER PER…

Shree Ashapura Co.Op. Credit So.Ltd., Vijapur vs. Pr.CIT., Gandhinagar

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 856/AHD/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad06 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice- & Smt.Suchitra R. Kambleassessment Year : 2014-15 Shree Ashapura Co-Op. Credit Principal Commissioner Of Society Limited, Vs Income-Tax, Opp. Gram Panchayat Office, Gandhinagar Pilvai, Taluka Vijapur, Dist. Mehsana-382850 Pan : Aaaaa 6598 C अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Vijay Kumar Jaiswal, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 30/06/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 06/07/2022 आदेश/O R D E R

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Kumar Jaiswal, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 244ASection 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)

…Gujarat Gramin Bank was wrongly allowed by the Assessing Officer as deduction under Section 80P(2) of the Act which was contrary to the principles enunciated by the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of PCIT Vs. Totgars Co-operative Sale Society, [2017] 83 Taxmann.com 140 (Karnataka). According to the learned PCIT, the order passed by the Assessing Officer dated 23.06.2016 under Section 143(3) of the Act allowing such deduction thus was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue and accordingly a show-cause notice was issued by him to the assessee under Section 263 of the Act. In reply, it was…

The Sardar Patel Co Opertaive Credit Society Limited, Mehsana vs. The Pr. CIT, Gandhinagar

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 575/AHD/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice- & Ms. Madhumita Royassessment Year : 2014-15 The Sardar Patel Co-Operative Credit Principal Commissioner Of Society Limited, Vs Income-Tax, Near Hdfc Bank Ltd., T.B. Road, Gandhinagar Vijapur, Dist. Mehsana Pan : Aaaat 4741 N अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri H.V. Doshi, Ca Revenue By : Shri James Kurian, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 07/06/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 17/06/2022 आदेश/O R D E R Per P.M. Jagtap, Vice-: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Learned Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Gandhinagar (“Pcit” In Short) Dated 11.03.2019 Passed Under Section 263 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act” In Short).

For Appellant: Shri H.V. Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri James Kurian, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 244ASection 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)

…Co-operative Banks was wrongly allowed by the Assessing Officer as deduction under Section 80P(2) of the Act which was contrary to the principles enunciated by the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of PCIT Vs. Totgars Co-operative Sale Society, [2017] 83 Taxmann.com 140 (Karnataka). According to the learned PCIT, the order passed by the Assessing Officer dated 27.09.2016 under Section 143(3) of the Act allowing such deduction thus was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue and accordingly a show-cause notice was issued by him to the assessee under Section 263 of the Act. In reply, it was…