THE DEESA MERCANTILE CO.OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,DEESA vs. THE ACIT.,B.K.CIRCLE, PALANPUR
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that interest earned from co-operative banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act, following the Gujarat High Court's decision.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80P(2) for interest earned from co-operative banks. The Tribunal initially decided against the assessee but later recalled the order due to a mistake apparent from the record.
What were the issues?
Whether interest earned from co-operative banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income-tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- State Bank Of India v. CIT817 citing72 Taxmann.com 64 · 2016 · HC
- Pr. CIT v. Totagars Co-operative Sales Society306 citing83 Taxmann.com 140 · 2017 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, VICE- & SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL
O R D E R
PER P.M. JAGTAP, VICE-PRESIDENT:
In this case, the appeal filed by the assessee was earlier disposed of by the Tribunal vide its order dated 14.12.2021 wherein the issue raised in Ground Nos. 3-5 relating to the assessee’s claim for deduction under Section 80P(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” in short) in respect of interest earned from co- operative banks amounting to Rs. 72,39,179/- was decided by the Tribunal against the assessee by relying on the decision of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of PCIT vs. Tatagars Co-operative Sale Society, (2017) 83 taxmann.com 140 (Kar.). Subsequently, the assessee filed a Miscellaneous Application being MA No.09/Ahd/2022 pointing out that the said decision was rendered without taking into consideration the decision of Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of State Bank of India Vs. CIT, [2016] 72 Taxmann.com 64, which was relied upon by the assessee and even the copy of the said judgment was placed on record. It was contended on behalf of the assessee that there was thus a mistake apparent from the record in the order of the Tribunal dated 14.12.2021 on this issue and accepting the same, the Tribunal allowed the Miscellaneous Application of the assessee vide order dated 13.04.2022 whereby the order of the Tribunal dated 14.12.2021 was The Deesa Mercantile Co-op Soc Ltd. Vs. ACIT AY : 2011-12 2 recalled by the Tribunal for the limited purpose of fresh adjudication of Ground Nos. 3 to 5.
We have heard the arguments of both the sides on the issue raised in Ground Nos. 3 to 5 of the assessee’s appeal relating to its claim for deduction under Section 80P(2) of the Act in respect of interest income earned from the Co- operative Banks. As agreed by the learned representatives of both the sides, this issue is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of State Bank of India (supra), wherein it was held that Section 80P(2)(d) specifically exempts interest earned from funds invested in co-operative societies and therefore, to the extent of the interest earned from investments made by it with any co-operative society, a co-operative society is entitled to deduction of the whole of such income under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. It was clarified by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court that interest earned from investments made in any bank, not being a co-operative society, is not deductible under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. In the present case, the amount of interest in question was earned by the assessee from co-operative banks and this being the undisputed position, we hold, following the decision of the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of State Bank of India (supra), that the said interest income is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. The impugned order passed by the learned CIT(A) on this issue is, therefore, set aside and the Assessing Officer is directed to allow the claim of the assessee for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. Ground Nos. 3 to 5 of the assessee’s appeal are accordingly allowed.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 17th June, 2022 at Ahmedabad. (SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL) VICE-PRESIDENT Ahmedabad, Dated 17/06/2022 *Bt The Deesa Mercantile Co-op Soc Ltd. Vs. ACIT AY : 2011-12 3
More judgments on Section 80P(2)
- The Mrutyunjaya Large Size Co Operative… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, PalakolITA 839/VIZ/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed24 Jul 2026AY 2022-23
- Surathkal Vyavasaya Seva Sahakari Bank… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), MangaloreITA 2299/BANG/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed11 May 2026AY 2020-21
- Surathkal Vyavasaya Seva Sahakari Sangha… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), MangaloreITA 2298/BANG/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed11 May 2026AY 2018-19
- Surathkal Vyavasaya Seva Sahakari Sangha… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), MangaloreITA 2297/BANG/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed11 May 2026AY 2017-18
- Mumbai Vidi Tambakhu Vyapari Sahakari… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 22(2)(2), Piramal…ITA 1801/MUM/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed7 May 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026