Pr. CIT v. Totagars

395 ITR 611High Court2017#39 most cited

What is Pr. CIT v. Totagars authority for?

Interest income earned by a cooperative society from surplus deposits or investments held with a cooperative bank is not eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act.

1,074

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,181 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Pr. CIT v. Totagars · 395 ITR 611 · Section 80P(2)(d) · cooperative society · interest income · cooperative bank · deduction · deposits · investments · eligibility 80P

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Pr. CIT v. Totagars

Golden Square Chs Ltd., Mumbai vs. ITO-22 (1)(5), Mumbai

In the result, the two appeals filed by the assesee are allowed

ITA 572/MUM/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 May 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shir Pavan Kumar Gadaleita No. 572 & 573/Mum/2023 (A.Y: 2012-13 & 2013-14) Golden Square Chsltd., Vs. Ito – 22(1)(5),Roomno. Cst Road, Sunder Nagar 323,3Rdfloor,Piramal Kalina, Santicruz (E) Chamber,Lalbaug, Mumbai. 400098 Parel, Mumbai.400012 Pan/Gir No. : Aaaag2527M Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Shri Kunal Lunawat & Shri Rajendra Kumar Jain.Ar Respondent By : Shri Rajendra Chandekar.Dr Date Of Hearing 02.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 04.05.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: These Are The Two Appeals Filed The Assessee Against The Different Orders Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac)/Cit(A), Delhi Passed U/S 250 Of The Act.

For Appellant: Shri Kunal Lunawat, &For Respondent: Shri Rajendra Chandekar.DR
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 154(7)Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

…on under Sec. 80P(2) (d) on the interest income on the investments/deposits parked with a co-operative bank. Although, in all fairness, we may observe that the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Pr. CIT Vs. Totagars cooperative Sale Society (2017) 395 ITR 611 (Karn), had concluded that a co- operative society would not be entitled to claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2) (d). At the same time, we find, that the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. Vs. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society (2017) 392 ITR 74 (Karn) and Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the cas…

Shree Durgamata Co-Operative Credit Soc Ltd., Mumbai vs. CIT (A) - NFAC, Delhi

In the result the appeal filed by the appeal is allowed

ITA 414/MUM/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 May 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shir Pavan Kumar Gadaleshree Durgamata Co-Op Vs. Cit(A)-Nfac, Society Ltd, Room.No 245-A, Room.No.52,Khandkebldg. North Block, No.12,Jksawantmarg, New Delhi, Opp Shivaji Mandir, Delhi-110001. Dadar (W), Mumbai-400028. Pan/Gir No. : Aagas9038K Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Shri.Gautam Gokhale.Ar Respondent By : Shri.Rajendra Chandekar.Dr Date Of Hearing 01.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 01.05.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi/Cit(A) Passed U/Sec 250 Of The Act. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

For Appellant: Shri.Gautam Gokhale.ARFor Respondent: Shri.Rajendra Chandekar.DR
Section 144Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…on under Sec. 80P(2) (d) on the interest income on the investments/deposits parked with a co-operative bank. Although, in all fairness, we may observe that the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Pr. CIT Vs. Totagars cooperative Sale Society (2017) 395 ITR 611 (Karn), had concluded that a co- operative society would not be entitled to claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2) (d). At the same time, we find, that the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. Vs. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society (2017) 392 ITR 74 (Karn) and Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the cas…

Rustomjee Regency 1 Co-Op Housing Society, Mumbai vs. CIT, CPC, Bangalore

In the result the appeal filed by the appeal is allowed

ITA 588/MUM/2023[2021-2022]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Apr 2023AY 2021-2022

Bench: Shir Pavan Kumar Gadalerustomjee Regency 1 Vs. Acit,Cpc Co-Op Housing Society Bangalore Cts No. 921/1, Rustom Irani Marg, Off Js Road, Dahisar (E), Mumbai – 400068. Pan/Gir No. : Aaaar6262J Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Shri.Mayur Makadia.Ar Respondent By : Smt.Jayashree Thakur.Dr Date Of Hearing 26.04.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 28.04.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi/Cit(A) Passed U/Sec 250 Of The Act. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

For Appellant: Shri.Mayur Makadia.ARFor Respondent: Smt.Jayashree Thakur.DR
Section 143(1)Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

…on under Sec. 80P(2) (d) on the interest income on the investments/deposits parked with a co-operative bank. Although, in all fairness, we may observe that the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Pr. CIT Vs. Totagars cooperative Sale Society (2017) 395 ITR 611 (Karn), had concluded that a co- operative society would not be entitled to claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2) (d). At the same time, we find, that the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. Vs. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society (2017) 392 ITR 74 (Karn) and Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the cas…

M/S. the Ajanta Ideal Co-Operative Housing Society Limited, Mumbai vs. Asst. Director of Incometax, CPC, Bengaluru

In the result, the appeal filed by the appeal is allowed

ITA 604/MUM/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Apr 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shir Pavan Kumar Gadalethe Ajanta Ideal Co- Vs. Adit,Cpc Operative Housing 1Stfloor,Prestigealpha, Society Ltd, 7/1+2, Hosour Road, Ajanta Apartments, Bengaluru-560100. Near Bus Station, 75, Colaba Road, Mumbai-400005 Pan/Gir No. : Aaaat7871M Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : None Respondent By : Ms. Jayashree Thakur.Dr Date Of Hearing 27.04.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 28.04.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi/Cit(A) Passed U/Sec 250 Of The Act. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Ms. Jayashree Thakur.DR
Section 143(1)Section 2(19)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

…on under Sec. 80P(2) (d) on the interest income on the investments/deposits parked with a co-operative bank. Although, in all fairness, we may observe that the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Pr. CIT Vs. Totagars cooperative Sale Society (2017) 395 ITR 611 (Karn), had concluded that a co- operative society would not be entitled to claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2) (d). At the same time, we find, that the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. Vs. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society (2017) 392 ITR 74 (Karn) and Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the cas…

Beliram Industrial Estate Premises Co-Op Society Ltd, Mumbai vs. Asst. Director of Income Tax, CPC, Bangaluru

In the result the appeal filed by the appeal is allowed

ITA 590/MUM/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Apr 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shir Pavan Kumar Gadalebeliram Industrialestate Vs. Adit,Cpc, Premises Co- Soc Ltd., Bengaluru-560500 Sv Road, Dahisar, Mumbai-400068. Pan/Gir No. : Aaaab6799E Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Mr.Prakash Shah.Ar Respondent By : Ms.Jayashree Thakur.Dr Date Of Hearing 27.04.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 28.04.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi/Cit(A) Passed U/Sec 250 Of The Act.The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

For Appellant: Mr.Prakash Shah.ARFor Respondent: Ms.Jayashree Thakur.DR
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 80P(2)(d)

…on under Sec. 80P(2) (d) on the interest income on the investments/deposits parked with a co-operative bank. Although, in all fairness, we may observe that the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Pr. CIT Vs. Totagars cooperative Sale Society (2017) 395 ITR 611 (Karn), had concluded that a co- operative society would not be entitled to claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2) (d). At the same time, we find, that the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. Vs. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society (2017) 392 ITR 74 (Karn) and Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the cas…

Malad Koikl Co, Operatvie Housing Society Limited, Mumbai vs. ITO Ward 41(3)(2), Mumbai

In the result, the two appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 522/MUM/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Apr 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleita Nos. 522 & 523/Mum/2023 (A.Ys: 2018-19 & 2019-20) Maladkokilco-Operative Vs. Ito, Ward 41(3)(2), Housing Society, Dgit(Vig)(West), S-2, Ground Floor, Mumbai-400020. Sunder Nagar, Sv Road, Malad (W), Mumbai -400064. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaeam8796J Appellant .. Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Kirit Sanghavi.Ar Revenue By : Smt.Jayashree Thakur.Dr Date Of Hearing 25.04.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 27.04.2023 आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri. Kirit sanghavi.ARFor Respondent: Smt.Jayashree Thakur.DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 80Section 80P(2)(d)

…r Sec. 80P(2)(d) on the interest income on the investments/deposits parked with a co-operative bank. Although, in all fairness, we may herein observe that the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Pr. CIT Vs. Totagars co-operative Sale Society (2017) 395 ITR 611 (Karn), had concluded that a co-operative society would not be entitled to claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2)(d). At the same time, we find, that the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. Vs. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society (2017) 392 ITR 74 (Karn) and Hon‟ble High Court of Gujarat in the case…

Middle Income Co-Op Hsg. Ltd, Mumbai vs. Assessing Officer, National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi

In the result the appeal filed by the appeal is allowed

ITA 543/MUM/2023[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Apr 2023AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shir Pavan Kumar Gadalemiddle Income Group Vs. Ito, Co.Op Hsg Soc. Ltd. Neac Centre, Behind Bldg.No. D-17, Delhi Gandhi Nagar,Bandra(E) Mumbai-400051 Pan/Gir No. : Aabm0722B Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Mr.Dharan Gandhi.Ar Respondent By : Ms.Jayashree Thakur.Dr Date Of Hearing 25.04.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 27.04.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi/Cit(A) Passed U/Sec 250 Of The Act. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

For Appellant: Mr.Dharan Gandhi.ARFor Respondent: Ms.Jayashree Thakur.DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

…r Sec. 80P(2)(d) on the interest income on the investments/deposits parked with a co-operative bank. Although, in all fairness, we may herein observe that the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Pr. CIT Vs. Totagars co-operative Sale Society (2017) 395 ITR 611 (Karn), had concluded that a Middle Income Group Co.Op Hsg Soc Ltd., Mumbai. co-operative society would not be entitled to claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2)(d). At the same time, we find, that the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. Vs. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society (2017) 392 ITR 74 (Karn…

The Motta Mahal Co.Op. Hsg Soc.Ltd, Mumbai vs. ITO, Ward 19(3)(1), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 56/MUM/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Mar 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.56/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Years: 2020-21) The Motta Mahal Co. Op बिधम/ Ito Ward 19(3)(1) Hsg Soc. Ltd Matru Mandir, Vs. The Motta Mahal Co. Op Mambai- 400007 . Hsg Soc Ltd., Nirmala Mahal, Bomanji Petit Road, Mumbai- 400036 . स्थधयी लेखध सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaaat0316R (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri. Nilesh Gaikwad Revenue By: Smt. Anil Gupta सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 01/03/2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 31/03/2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Aby T. Varkey, Jm: This Is An Appeal Preferred By The Appellant/Assessee Motta Mahal Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)/Nfac, Delhi Dated 30.11.2022 For The Assessment Year 2020-21. 2. Assessee Is A Co-Operative Housing Society, Registered Under The Maharashtra Co-Op Society Act 1960. The Grounds Of Appeal Of The Assessee Is Against The Action Of The Ld. Cit(A) Confirming The Action Of Ao/Cpc Not Allowing The Claim Of The Assessee On The Interest Income U/S 80P(2)(D) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter “The Act”) Which It Had Received From Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank To The Tune Of Rs. 99,807/-.

For Appellant: Shri. Nilesh GaikwadFor Respondent: Smt. Anil Gupta
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 80P(2)(d)

…claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(4) of the Act. Although, in all fairness, we may herein observe that the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Pr. CIT Vs. 6 A.Y. 2020-21 The Motta Mahal Co-op HSG Soc. Ltd. Totagars co-operative Sale Society (2017) 395 ITR 611 (Karn), as had been relied upon by the ld. D.R before us, had held, that a co-operative society would not be entitled to claim deduction under Sec. 80P(2)(d); but then, the Hon'ble High Court in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. Vs. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society (2017) 392 ITR 74 (Karn) and Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat in t…