M/S. JUDICIAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,MYSURU vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), MYSORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal corrected an inadvertent error in the citation of a case mentioned in its previous order. The citation '392 ITR 0074 (Karnataka)' was substituted with the correct citation '395 ITR 611 (Karnataka)'.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was disposed of by an order dated 11.4.2023. A corrigendum was issued to correct a citation error in paragraph 8 of the original order.
What were the issues?
Correction of a case citation error in a previous tribunal order. The correct citation for a case related to deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) was identified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Pr. CIT v. Totagars1,074 citing395 ITR 611 · 2017 · HC
- Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. v. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society762 citing392 ITR 74 · 2017 · HC
This appeal by the assessee is disposed of by order dated 11.4.2023. In para 8 of the order, the sentence towards end of the para reads as under:-
8. On the other hand, the ld. DR supported the orders of lower authorities and submitted ………………………………….. He further submitted that in the case of PCIT & Ors. v. Totagars Co-operative Sale Society reported in 392 ITR 0074 (Karnataka), the Hon’ble Court had decided that deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) is allowable on the interest income received from co-operative society.
It is noticed that there is an inadvertent error in mentioning the citation of the case of PCIT & Ors. v. Totagars Co-operative Sale Society as 392 ITR 0074 (Karnataka) instead of 395 ITR 611 (Karnataka). Hence the citation ‘392 ITR 0074’ therein is modified and substituted to read as “395 ITR 611”.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- J.M.Swamy vs. Government Of INDIAKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Acc LTD. vs. Secy.Industries Deptt.Orissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Kumaran Transports (Tuticorin) Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Madras · 16 Oct 2026