Pr. CIT v. Shyam Steel Industries Ltd.

93 Taxmann.com 495High Court2018#7531 most cited

What is Pr. CIT v. Shyam Steel Industries Ltd. authority for?

A capital subsidy, the real purpose of which is to incentivize new or expanded units, is to be treated as a capital receipt, not a revenue receipt. The form or mechanism of the subsidy is irrelevant.

15

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2007 to 2024.

Also referred to as

Pr. CIT v. Shyam Steel Industries Ltd. · capital subsidy · capital receipt · revenue receipt · incentive · expansion · new units · Ponni Sugars & Chemicals Ltd.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Pr. CIT v. Shyam Steel Industries Ltd.

Pr. CIT v. Shyam Steel Industries Ltd. (93 Taxmann.com 495) — Cited in 15 Judgments | BharatTax