PCIT v. Oil Industry Development Board

103 Taxmann.com 326Supreme Court of India2019#879 most cited

What is PCIT v. Oil Industry Development Board authority for?

Disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is not permissible in the absence of any exempt income.

120

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2026.

Also referred to as

PCIT v. Oil Industry Development Board · section 14A · exempt income · disallowance · section 143(3) · section 115JB

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing PCIT v. Oil Industry Development Board

Ebix Cash Ltd., Noida vs. ACIT Circle-5(1)(1), Gautam Budh Nagar

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed and by assessee is allowed

ITA 4453/DEL/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Sept 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwalassessment Year-2018-19) M/S Ebix Cash Ltd., Asst. Cit, Plot No.122 & 123, Nsez, Phase- Circle-5(1)(1), Ii, Noida, Vs. Gautambudh Nagar, Gautambudh Nagar-201305 Noida, Uttarparadesh. Uttar Pradesh, India. Pan-Aaace9981H (Appellant) (Respondent) Asst. Cit, M/S Ebix Cash Ltd., Circle-5(1)(1), Plot No.122 & 123, Nsez, Gautambudh Nagar, Vs. Phase-Ii, Noida, Noida, Uttar Paradesh. Gautambudh Nagar-201305 Uttar Pradesh, India. Pan-Aaace9981H (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Lalit Mohan, Ca & Shri Ankit Kumar, Adv. Department By Shrirajesh Kumar Dhanesta,Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 14/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 10/09/2025 Order Per Anubhav Sharma, Jm:

Section 10ASection 115JSection 143(3)Section 144BSection 14ASection 14A(1)Section 250

…xempt income, no disallowance can be made. Reliance can be placed on the judgment of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Cheminvest Ltd. vs. CIT, 378 ITR 33 and the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of PCIT vs. Oil Industries Development Board 103 Taxmann.com 326 (SC). 5.1 Furthermore, Ld. AR has established and demonstrated that share capital andreserves exceeds investment made, so that also does not justified disallowance. In this context, at page 31 of the PB, assessee has provided the FBIX Cash Ltd. vs. ACIT details of investment and at page 4 of PB, there is a financial statement showing wit…

Pradeep Kumar Jindal, New Delhi vs. ACIT, Circle- 20(1), New Delhi

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 6849/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Jun 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: : Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Smt. Annapurna Guptaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 6849/Del/2017 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12) बनाम/ Pradeep Kumar Jindal Acit H-1/1A, Model Town-Iii, Circle-20(1), New Delhi Vs. Behind Icici Bank, New Delhi – 110009 (C/O. Vivek Aarushi & Associates, G-40, Nizamuddin West, New Delhi, Delhi-110013) "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaipj8526A (Appellant) .. (Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant By : None ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Sunil Yadav, Cit.Dr 26/03/2025 Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement 18/06/2025 O R D E R Per Smt. Annapurna Gupta, Am:

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Yadav, CIT.DR
Section 14ASection 24bSection 250Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCHES “F”, NEW DELHI BEFORE : SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 6849/Del/2017 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12) बनाम/ Pradeep Kumar Jindal ACIT H-1/1A, Model Town-III, Circle-20(1), New Delhi Vs. Behind ICICI Bank, New Delhi – 110009 (C/o. Vivek Aarushi & Associates, G-40, Nizamuddin West, New Delhi, Delhi-110013) "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAIPJ8526A (Appellant) .. (Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant by : None ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent by : Shri Sunil Yadav, CIT.DR 2…

Cosmic Informatics Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. ACIT Central Circle - 2, New Delhi

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in appeal No

ITA 2444/DEL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sudhir Kumar & Shri Manish Agarwalita No.2442 To 2445/Del/2023 (Assessment Years 2013-14 To 2016-17) Dcit, Lotus Herbals Pvt. Ltd., Cc-20, Delhi. Room No.269A, 2 Nd Floor, Ara Vs. Centre, E-2, Jhandewalan, New Delhi-110055. Pan-Aaacl0198F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Rohit Jain, Adv. & Shri Shivam Gupta, Ca Department By Sh. Mukesh Jha, Cit Dr & Ms. Pooja Swroop, Cit-Dr 29.09.2025 Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement 23.12.2025 O R D E R Per Manish Agarwal, Am: These Are Five Appeals Filed By The Revenue Against The Separate Orders Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-27, New Delhi. All Are Dated 12.06.2023 For Assessment Years As Tabulated As Under:

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151

…the disallowance. Therefore, the action of the AO in considering the average value of gross value of investment is not correct. This view is supported by the judgement of hon’ble Supreme court in the case of CIT Vs. Oil Industry Development Board reported in 103 Taxmann.com 326 (SC), of hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case ACB India Ltd. (supra) and further of hon’ble Special Bench of Delhi Tribunal in the case of ACIT, Circle-17(1), New Delhi vs Vireet Investment (P.) Ltd. reported in [2017] 82 taxmann.com 415 (Delhi-Trib.) (SB). 35. In view of the above facts and discussions and by respectfully following the…

Cosmic Informatics Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. ACIT Central Circle - 2, New Delhi

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in appeal No

ITA 2443/DEL/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sudhir Kumar & Shri Manish Agarwalita No.2442 To 2445/Del/2023 (Assessment Years 2013-14 To 2016-17) Dcit, Lotus Herbals Pvt. Ltd., Cc-20, Delhi. Room No.269A, 2 Nd Floor, Ara Vs. Centre, E-2, Jhandewalan, New Delhi-110055. Pan-Aaacl0198F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Rohit Jain, Adv. & Shri Shivam Gupta, Ca Department By Sh. Mukesh Jha, Cit Dr & Ms. Pooja Swroop, Cit-Dr 29.09.2025 Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement 23.12.2025 O R D E R Per Manish Agarwal, Am: These Are Five Appeals Filed By The Revenue Against The Separate Orders Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-27, New Delhi. All Are Dated 12.06.2023 For Assessment Years As Tabulated As Under:

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151

…the disallowance. Therefore, the action of the AO in considering the average value of gross value of investment is not correct. This view is supported by the judgement of hon’ble Supreme court in the case of CIT Vs. Oil Industry Development Board reported in 103 Taxmann.com 326 (SC), of hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case ACB India Ltd. (supra) and further of hon’ble Special Bench of Delhi Tribunal in the case of ACIT, Circle-17(1), New Delhi vs Vireet Investment (P.) Ltd. reported in [2017] 82 taxmann.com 415 (Delhi-Trib.) (SB). 35. In view of the above facts and discussions and by respectfully following the…