INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-16(1), HYDERABAD vs. NSL NAGAPATNAM POWER VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The CIT(A) deleted the disallowance, a decision upheld by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The ITAT ruled that, as per the pre-amended Section 14A (before Finance Act, 2022), no disallowance could be made if the assessee had not earned any exempt income in the relevant assessment year, relying on various High Court and Supreme Court judgments. The Tribunal clarified that the 'Explanation' inserted in Section 14A by the Finance Act, 2022, is prospective, effective from April 1, 2022, and thus not applicable to A.Y. 2017-18.
What were the facts?
The assessee, NSL Nagapatnam Power Ventures Private Limited, filed its return for A.Y. 2017-18 declaring a loss. The Assessing Officer (AO) made a disallowance of Rs. 3,60,86,885/- under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, arguing that the assessee had invested Rs. 3,69,69,63,500/- in equity of subsidiary companies and claimed interest/other expenses, which should be disallowed even if no exempt income (dividend) was actually earned. The assessee contended that no exempt income was derived during the subject year and the investments were for business development.
What were the issues?
1. Whether disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, read with Rule 8D, can be made when no exempt income is actually earned by the assessee during the relevant assessment year (A.Y. 2017-18). 2. Whether the 'Explanation' inserted in Section 14A by the Finance Act, 2022, has retrospective applicability.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Chettinad Logistics (P) Ltd.444 citing248 Taxmann 55 · 2017 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Chettinad Logistics (P.) Ltd.421 citing95 Taxmann.com 250 · 2018 · SC
- PCIT v. Oil Industry Development Board120 citing262 Taxmann 102 · 2019 · SC
- Madhya Pradesh in Pr. CIT v. Keti Constructions18 citing162 Taxmann.com 278 · 2024 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ B ‘ Bench, Hyderabad
आदेशकी प्रनतनलनप अग्रेनर्त/ Copy of the order forwarded to:-
1. 1. निर्धाररती/The Assessee : NSL Nagapatnam Power Ventures Private Limited, 8-2-684/2/A, 4th Floor, NSL Icon Road No.12, Khairatabad, Banjara Hills, S.O., Hyderabad – 500034, Telangana. 2. रधजस्व/ The Revenue : The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 16(1), Hyderabad.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026