PCIT v. Mohommad Haji Adam & Co.

103 Taxmann.com 459High Court2019#688 most cited

What is PCIT v. Mohommad Haji Adam & Co. authority for?

Where purchases are found to be bogus, the profit element embedded in such purchases is to be brought to tax, not the entire purchase value. An addition for non-genuine purchases may be justified.

146

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2026.

Also referred to as

PCIT v. Mohommad Haji Adam & Co. · 103 Taxmann.com 459 · bogus purchases · non-genuine purchases · profit element addition · business income

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing PCIT v. Mohommad Haji Adam & Co.

ITO-19(1)(1), Mumbai vs. Deepak Jagshibhai Visaria, Mumbai

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue bearing ITA Nos

ITA 4082/MUM/2024[2009]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Feb 2025

Bench: Itat By The Cbdt, Vide Its Circular No.5/2024 Dated 15/03/2024 As Mended By Circular No. F.No.279/Misc/142/2007-Itj(Pg) Dated 15/03/2024. But The Ld.Dr Stated That The Assessee’S Case Falls Under The Exception Provided In Paragraph 3.1(H) Of The Above Circular, Wherein It Is Stated That In Case Involving Organized Tax Evasion Including The Case Of Accommodation Entry Of Bogus Purchases, The Decision Of That Appeal Shall Be Taken On Merit Without Having Rigor To Tax Effect & The Monetary Effect. The Ld.Ar Has Not Made Any Objection. So Accordingly, Both The Appeals Are Taken For Adjudication.

For Appellant: Shri Prateek JainFor Respondent: Shri Asif Karmali (SR DR)
Section 143(3)Section 250

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “J(SMC)”, MUMBAI BEFORESHRI AMARJITSINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER - A.Y. 2011-12 - A.Y. 2009-10 Income-tax Officer, vs Mr. Deepak JagshibhaiVisaria Primal Chamber, 501, 5th Floor, Room No.11,2ndFloor, 61, Doctor Piramal Chambers, Lalbaug, Niwas, Banganga Road, Mumbai-400 012 Walkeshwar, Mumbai-400 006 PAN : AAAPV9782G APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Prateek Jain Respondent by : Shri Asif Karmali (SR DR) Date of hearing : 15/01/2025 Date of pronouncement : 04/02/2025 O R D E R PER ANIKESH BANERJEE: Both the appeal…

Income Tax Officer, Piramal Chamber, Mumbai vs. Deepak Jagshibhai Visaria, Mumbai

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue bearing ITA Nos

ITA 4077/MUM/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Feb 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Itat By The Cbdt, Vide Its Circular No.5/2024 Dated 15/03/2024 As Mended By Circular No. F.No.279/Misc/142/2007-Itj(Pg) Dated 15/03/2024. But The Ld.Dr Stated That The Assessee’S Case Falls Under The Exception Provided In Paragraph 3.1(H) Of The Above Circular, Wherein It Is Stated That In Case Involving Organized Tax Evasion Including The Case Of Accommodation Entry Of Bogus Purchases, The Decision Of That Appeal Shall Be Taken On Merit Without Having Rigor To Tax Effect & The Monetary Effect. The Ld.Ar Has Not Made Any Objection. So Accordingly, Both The Appeals Are Taken For Adjudication.

For Appellant: Shri Prateek JainFor Respondent: Shri Asif Karmali (SR DR)
Section 143(3)Section 250

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “J(SMC)”, MUMBAI BEFORESHRI AMARJITSINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER - A.Y. 2011-12 - A.Y. 2009-10 Income-tax Officer, vs Mr. Deepak JagshibhaiVisaria Primal Chamber, 501, 5th Floor, Room No.11,2ndFloor, 61, Doctor Piramal Chambers, Lalbaug, Niwas, Banganga Road, Mumbai-400 012 Walkeshwar, Mumbai-400 006 PAN : AAAPV9782G APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Prateek Jain Respondent by : Shri Asif Karmali (SR DR) Date of hearing : 15/01/2025 Date of pronouncement : 04/02/2025 O R D E R PER ANIKESH BANERJEE: Both the appeal…