PCIT v. Mohommad Haji Adam & Co.

103 Taxmann.com 459High Court2019#691 most cited

What is PCIT v. Mohommad Haji Adam & Co. authority for?

The primary onus to prove the genuineness of expenditure claimed as a deduction, particularly for disputed purchases, rests with the assessee. It is the assessee's burden to substantiate such purchases under the Act.

146

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2026.

Also referred to as

PCIT v. Mohommad Haji Adam & Co. · Bombay High Court 2019 · 103 Taxmann.com 459 · Section 37(1) · Section 69C · onus of proof · genuineness of expenditure · disputed purchases · assessee's burden · business deduction · primary onus on taxpayer

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing PCIT v. Mohommad Haji Adam & Co.

Showing 120 of 146 · Page 1 of 8

...