PCIT v. Avinash Kumar Setia

81 Taxmann.com 476High Court2017#953 most cited

What is PCIT v. Avinash Kumar Setia authority for?

An addition to income made based on a statement is justified, especially when such statement is corroborated by evidence found during a search operation, such as digital data and employee confirmations.

112

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Avinash Kumar Setia · Section 132(4) statement · addition based on statement · corroboration of evidence · search assessment · Section 153A · digital evidence · pen drive evidence · justified additions · Delhi High Court

Sections most often in play

Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 132Section 142(1)Section 69Section 153CSection 56
Read the full judgment

Issues it is cited on

section 133(a)abatement of assessmentsection 114(e)section 79section 153b(1)(a)time barred assessmentsection 148(1)retracted statementsection 153(1)(a)section 65bbona fide mistakestatement under section 132(4)

Judgments citing PCIT v. Avinash Kumar Setia

DCIT, New Delhi vs. Shri Mahesh Mehta, Delhi

ITA 3347/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Oct 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Kuldip Singh

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri J.K. Mishra, CIT DR
Section 139Section 143Section 153A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH ‘D’ : NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and SHRI KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.2504/Del./2014 (Assessment Year : 2009-10) Ms. Kusum Mehta, vs. ACIT, Central Circle 3, 2042, Katra Tobacco, New Delhi. Khari Baoli, Delhi – 110 006. (PAN : AAPPM3938E) ITA No.2773/Del./2014 (Assessment Year : 2009-10) ACIT, Central Circle 3, vs. Ms. Kusum Mehta, New Delhi. 2042, Katra Tobacco, Khari Baoli, Delhi – 110 006. (PAN : AAPPM3938E) ITA No.2503/Del./2014 (Assessment Year : 2009-10) Shri Mahesh Mehta, vs. ACIT, Central Circle 3, 2042, Katra Tobacco, Ne…

DCIT, New Delhi vs. Smt. Kusum Mehta, New Delhi

ITA 2773/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Oct 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Kuldip Singh

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri J.K. Mishra, CIT DR
Section 139Section 143Section 153A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH ‘D’ : NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and SHRI KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.2504/Del./2014 (Assessment Year : 2009-10) Ms. Kusum Mehta, vs. ACIT, Central Circle 3, 2042, Katra Tobacco, New Delhi. Khari Baoli, Delhi – 110 006. (PAN : AAPPM3938E) ITA No.2773/Del./2014 (Assessment Year : 2009-10) ACIT, Central Circle 3, vs. Ms. Kusum Mehta, New Delhi. 2042, Katra Tobacco, Khari Baoli, Delhi – 110 006. (PAN : AAPPM3938E) ITA No.2503/Del./2014 (Assessment Year : 2009-10) Shri Mahesh Mehta, vs. ACIT, Central Circle 3, 2042, Katra Tobacco, Ne…

Kusum Mehta, Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

ITA 2504/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Oct 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Kuldip Singh

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri J.K. Mishra, CIT DR
Section 139Section 143Section 153A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH ‘D’ : NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and SHRI KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.2504/Del./2014 (Assessment Year : 2009-10) Ms. Kusum Mehta, vs. ACIT, Central Circle 3, 2042, Katra Tobacco, New Delhi. Khari Baoli, Delhi – 110 006. (PAN : AAPPM3938E) ITA No.2773/Del./2014 (Assessment Year : 2009-10) ACIT, Central Circle 3, vs. Ms. Kusum Mehta, New Delhi. 2042, Katra Tobacco, Khari Baoli, Delhi – 110 006. (PAN : AAPPM3938E) ITA No.2503/Del./2014 (Assessment Year : 2009-10) Shri Mahesh Mehta, vs. ACIT, Central Circle 3, 2042, Katra Tobacco, Ne…

Mahesh Mehta, Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

ITA 2503/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Oct 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Kuldip Singh

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri J.K. Mishra, CIT DR
Section 139Section 143Section 153A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH ‘D’ : NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and SHRI KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.2504/Del./2014 (Assessment Year : 2009-10) Ms. Kusum Mehta, vs. ACIT, Central Circle 3, 2042, Katra Tobacco, New Delhi. Khari Baoli, Delhi – 110 006. (PAN : AAPPM3938E) ITA No.2773/Del./2014 (Assessment Year : 2009-10) ACIT, Central Circle 3, vs. Ms. Kusum Mehta, New Delhi. 2042, Katra Tobacco, Khari Baoli, Delhi – 110 006. (PAN : AAPPM3938E) ITA No.2503/Del./2014 (Assessment Year : 2009-10) Shri Mahesh Mehta, vs. ACIT, Central Circle 3, 2042, Katra Tobacco, Ne…

Sajan Kumar Jain, Delhi vs. DCIT, Central Circle-25, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5949/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

Section 127Section 132Section 153ASection 153C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: ‘G’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.R.R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A .Nos.-5949 to 5951/Del/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEARS- 2013-14 to 2015-16) Sajan Kumar Jain vs DCIT 1443, Sector-14, Faridabad, Central Circle 25, Haryana. New Delhi. PAN No. ACSPJ6904A (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) I.T.A .Nos.-5945 & 5946/Del/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEARS- 2014-15 & 2015-16) Anand Kumar Jain (HUF) vs DCIT 672, Sector-14, Faridabad, Central Circle 25, Haryana. New Delhi. PAN No. AAGHA8277F (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) I.T.A .Nos.-4723, 5947 & 5948Del/2018 (ASSESSM…

Anand Kumar Jain, Faridabad vs. DCIT, Central Circle-25, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4723/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

Section 127Section 132Section 153ASection 153C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: ‘G’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.R.R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A .Nos.-5949 to 5951/Del/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEARS- 2013-14 to 2015-16) Sajan Kumar Jain vs DCIT 1443, Sector-14, Faridabad, Central Circle 25, Haryana. New Delhi. PAN No. ACSPJ6904A (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) I.T.A .Nos.-5945 & 5946/Del/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEARS- 2014-15 & 2015-16) Anand Kumar Jain (HUF) vs DCIT 672, Sector-14, Faridabad, Central Circle 25, Haryana. New Delhi. PAN No. AAGHA8277F (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) I.T.A .Nos.-4723, 5947 & 5948Del/2018 (ASSESSM…

Satish Dev Jain, Delhi vs. DCIT, Central Circle-25, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5955/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

Section 127Section 132Section 153ASection 153C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: ‘G’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.R.R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A .Nos.-5949 to 5951/Del/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEARS- 2013-14 to 2015-16) Sajan Kumar Jain vs DCIT 1443, Sector-14, Faridabad, Central Circle 25, Haryana. New Delhi. PAN No. ACSPJ6904A (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) I.T.A .Nos.-5945 & 5946/Del/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEARS- 2014-15 & 2015-16) Anand Kumar Jain (HUF) vs DCIT 672, Sector-14, Faridabad, Central Circle 25, Haryana. New Delhi. PAN No. AAGHA8277F (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) I.T.A .Nos.-4723, 5947 & 5948Del/2018 (ASSESSM…

Anand Kumar Jain, New Delhi vs. DCIT, Central Circle- 25, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5948/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

Section 127Section 132Section 153ASection 153C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: ‘G’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.R.R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A .Nos.-5949 to 5951/Del/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEARS- 2013-14 to 2015-16) Sajan Kumar Jain vs DCIT 1443, Sector-14, Faridabad, Central Circle 25, Haryana. New Delhi. PAN No. ACSPJ6904A (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) I.T.A .Nos.-5945 & 5946/Del/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEARS- 2014-15 & 2015-16) Anand Kumar Jain (HUF) vs DCIT 672, Sector-14, Faridabad, Central Circle 25, Haryana. New Delhi. PAN No. AAGHA8277F (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) I.T.A .Nos.-4723, 5947 & 5948Del/2018 (ASSESSM…

Anand Kumar Jain, New Delhi vs. DCIT, Central Circle- 25, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5947/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

Section 127Section 132Section 153ASection 153C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: ‘G’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.R.R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A .Nos.-5949 to 5951/Del/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEARS- 2013-14 to 2015-16) Sajan Kumar Jain vs DCIT 1443, Sector-14, Faridabad, Central Circle 25, Haryana. New Delhi. PAN No. ACSPJ6904A (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) I.T.A .Nos.-5945 & 5946/Del/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEARS- 2014-15 & 2015-16) Anand Kumar Jain (HUF) vs DCIT 672, Sector-14, Faridabad, Central Circle 25, Haryana. New Delhi. PAN No. AAGHA8277F (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) I.T.A .Nos.-4723, 5947 & 5948Del/2018 (ASSESSM…

Anand Jain HUF, New Delhi vs. DCIT, Central Circle- 25, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5946/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

Section 127Section 132Section 153ASection 153C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: ‘G’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.R.R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A .Nos.-5949 to 5951/Del/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEARS- 2013-14 to 2015-16) Sajan Kumar Jain vs DCIT 1443, Sector-14, Faridabad, Central Circle 25, Haryana. New Delhi. PAN No. ACSPJ6904A (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) I.T.A .Nos.-5945 & 5946/Del/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEARS- 2014-15 & 2015-16) Anand Kumar Jain (HUF) vs DCIT 672, Sector-14, Faridabad, Central Circle 25, Haryana. New Delhi. PAN No. AAGHA8277F (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) I.T.A .Nos.-4723, 5947 & 5948Del/2018 (ASSESSM…

Anand Jain HUF, New Delhi vs. DCIT, Central Circle- 25, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5945/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

Section 127Section 132Section 153ASection 153C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: ‘G’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.R.R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A .Nos.-5949 to 5951/Del/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEARS- 2013-14 to 2015-16) Sajan Kumar Jain vs DCIT 1443, Sector-14, Faridabad, Central Circle 25, Haryana. New Delhi. PAN No. ACSPJ6904A (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) I.T.A .Nos.-5945 & 5946/Del/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEARS- 2014-15 & 2015-16) Anand Kumar Jain (HUF) vs DCIT 672, Sector-14, Faridabad, Central Circle 25, Haryana. New Delhi. PAN No. AAGHA8277F (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) I.T.A .Nos.-4723, 5947 & 5948Del/2018 (ASSESSM…

Tridevh Construction Company, Mumbai vs. ACIT - 29 (3), Mumbai

In the result, the ground of

ITA 3064/MUM/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jul 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri G. Manjunathatridevh Construction Company, Acit-29(3) 2Nd Floor, C-10, Pratyashakar Office No.32, Nirmal Galaxy, Vs. Lbs Road, Mulund West, Bhavan, Bkc, Mumbai-400080. Mumbai. Pan: Aadft2138H Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Shri Nimesh Chothani With Shri Lajari Oswal (Ar) Respondent By : Shri Manoj Kumar Singh (Cit-Dr) Date Of Hearing : 10.07.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 24.07.2019 Order Under Section 254(1)Of Income Tax Act

For Appellant: Shri Nimesh Chothani with Shri Lajari Oswal (AR)For Respondent: Shri Manoj Kumar Singh (CIT-DR)
Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 254(1)

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Tridevh Construction Company, ACIT-29(3) 2nd Floor, C-10, Pratyashakar Office No.32, Nirmal Galaxy, Vs. LBS Road, Mulund West, Bhavan, BKC, Mumbai-400080. Mumbai. PAN: AADFT2138H Appellant Respondent Appellant by : Shri Nimesh Chothani with Shri Lajari Oswal (AR) Respondent by : Shri Manoj Kumar Singh (CIT-DR) Date of Hearing : 10.07.2019 Date of Pronouncement : 24.07.2019 ORDER UNDER SECTION 254(1)OF INCOME TAX ACT PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER; 1. This appeal by ass…

Ved Prakash, Haryana vs. ACIT, Bhiwani

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is on this ground is dismissed

ITA 1413/DEL/2017[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Sh. H. S. Sidhudr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1409/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2001-02 Ita No. 1410/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2002-03 Ita No. 1411/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2003-04 Ita No. 1412/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 Ita No. 1413/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ved Parkash, Vs Asstt. Commissioner Of Income S/O Sh. Partap Singh, Tax, Sco 202-203, Office Of Paras Wali Gal, Near Bus Stand, Income Tax, Huda City Centre, Charkhi Dadri, Haryana Bhiwani (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Azyps0463J Assessee By : None Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.07.2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 09.07.2019 Order Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A), Rohtak Each Dated 30.12.2016. 2. In Ita No. 1409/Del/2017, The Assessee Has Raised The Following Effective Grounds: “1. That The Ld. Cit(A) In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case Has Erred In Dismissing The Appeal Without Considering That The Assessed Income After Giving Appeal Effect Of Order Of Ld. Cit(A) & Hon'Ble Itat Was Wrongly Determined On 03/03/2011 At Rs.1,58,925/- Instead Of Correct Computation At Rs.66,425/-. Even This Issue Has Not Been Considered Though Raised. 2. That The Ld. Cit(A) In The Facts Of The Case Has Erred In Confirming The Assessment Of Income From School Without

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES ‘G’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. H. S. Sidhu, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member ITA No. 1409/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2001-02 ITA No. 1410/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2002-03 ITA No. 1411/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2003-04 ITA No. 1412/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 ITA No. 1413/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ved Parkash, Vs Asstt. Commissioner of Income S/o Sh. Partap Singh, Tax, SCO 202-203, Office of Paras Wali Gal, Near Bus Stand, Income Tax, HUDA City Centre, Charkhi Dadri, Haryana Bhiwani (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AZYPS0463J Assessee…

Ved Prakash, Haryana vs. ACIT, Bhiwani

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is on this ground is dismissed

ITA 1412/DEL/2017[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: Sh. H. S. Sidhudr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1409/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2001-02 Ita No. 1410/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2002-03 Ita No. 1411/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2003-04 Ita No. 1412/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 Ita No. 1413/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ved Parkash, Vs Asstt. Commissioner Of Income S/O Sh. Partap Singh, Tax, Sco 202-203, Office Of Paras Wali Gal, Near Bus Stand, Income Tax, Huda City Centre, Charkhi Dadri, Haryana Bhiwani (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Azyps0463J Assessee By : None Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.07.2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 09.07.2019 Order Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A), Rohtak Each Dated 30.12.2016. 2. In Ita No. 1409/Del/2017, The Assessee Has Raised The Following Effective Grounds: “1. That The Ld. Cit(A) In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case Has Erred In Dismissing The Appeal Without Considering That The Assessed Income After Giving Appeal Effect Of Order Of Ld. Cit(A) & Hon'Ble Itat Was Wrongly Determined On 03/03/2011 At Rs.1,58,925/- Instead Of Correct Computation At Rs.66,425/-. Even This Issue Has Not Been Considered Though Raised. 2. That The Ld. Cit(A) In The Facts Of The Case Has Erred In Confirming The Assessment Of Income From School Without

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES ‘G’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. H. S. Sidhu, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member ITA No. 1409/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2001-02 ITA No. 1410/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2002-03 ITA No. 1411/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2003-04 ITA No. 1412/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 ITA No. 1413/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ved Parkash, Vs Asstt. Commissioner of Income S/o Sh. Partap Singh, Tax, SCO 202-203, Office of Paras Wali Gal, Near Bus Stand, Income Tax, HUDA City Centre, Charkhi Dadri, Haryana Bhiwani (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AZYPS0463J Assessee…

Ved Prakash, Haryana vs. ACIT, Bhiwani

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is on this ground is dismissed

ITA 1411/DEL/2017[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: Sh. H. S. Sidhudr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1409/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2001-02 Ita No. 1410/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2002-03 Ita No. 1411/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2003-04 Ita No. 1412/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 Ita No. 1413/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ved Parkash, Vs Asstt. Commissioner Of Income S/O Sh. Partap Singh, Tax, Sco 202-203, Office Of Paras Wali Gal, Near Bus Stand, Income Tax, Huda City Centre, Charkhi Dadri, Haryana Bhiwani (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Azyps0463J Assessee By : None Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.07.2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 09.07.2019 Order Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A), Rohtak Each Dated 30.12.2016. 2. In Ita No. 1409/Del/2017, The Assessee Has Raised The Following Effective Grounds: “1. That The Ld. Cit(A) In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case Has Erred In Dismissing The Appeal Without Considering That The Assessed Income After Giving Appeal Effect Of Order Of Ld. Cit(A) & Hon'Ble Itat Was Wrongly Determined On 03/03/2011 At Rs.1,58,925/- Instead Of Correct Computation At Rs.66,425/-. Even This Issue Has Not Been Considered Though Raised. 2. That The Ld. Cit(A) In The Facts Of The Case Has Erred In Confirming The Assessment Of Income From School Without

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES ‘G’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. H. S. Sidhu, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member ITA No. 1409/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2001-02 ITA No. 1410/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2002-03 ITA No. 1411/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2003-04 ITA No. 1412/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 ITA No. 1413/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ved Parkash, Vs Asstt. Commissioner of Income S/o Sh. Partap Singh, Tax, SCO 202-203, Office of Paras Wali Gal, Near Bus Stand, Income Tax, HUDA City Centre, Charkhi Dadri, Haryana Bhiwani (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AZYPS0463J Assessee…

Ved Prakash, Haryana vs. ACIT, Bhiwani

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is on this ground is dismissed

ITA 1410/DEL/2017[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: Sh. H. S. Sidhudr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1409/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2001-02 Ita No. 1410/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2002-03 Ita No. 1411/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2003-04 Ita No. 1412/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 Ita No. 1413/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ved Parkash, Vs Asstt. Commissioner Of Income S/O Sh. Partap Singh, Tax, Sco 202-203, Office Of Paras Wali Gal, Near Bus Stand, Income Tax, Huda City Centre, Charkhi Dadri, Haryana Bhiwani (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Azyps0463J Assessee By : None Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.07.2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 09.07.2019 Order Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A), Rohtak Each Dated 30.12.2016. 2. In Ita No. 1409/Del/2017, The Assessee Has Raised The Following Effective Grounds: “1. That The Ld. Cit(A) In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case Has Erred In Dismissing The Appeal Without Considering That The Assessed Income After Giving Appeal Effect Of Order Of Ld. Cit(A) & Hon'Ble Itat Was Wrongly Determined On 03/03/2011 At Rs.1,58,925/- Instead Of Correct Computation At Rs.66,425/-. Even This Issue Has Not Been Considered Though Raised. 2. That The Ld. Cit(A) In The Facts Of The Case Has Erred In Confirming The Assessment Of Income From School Without

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES ‘G’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. H. S. Sidhu, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member ITA No. 1409/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2001-02 ITA No. 1410/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2002-03 ITA No. 1411/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2003-04 ITA No. 1412/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 ITA No. 1413/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ved Parkash, Vs Asstt. Commissioner of Income S/o Sh. Partap Singh, Tax, SCO 202-203, Office of Paras Wali Gal, Near Bus Stand, Income Tax, HUDA City Centre, Charkhi Dadri, Haryana Bhiwani (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AZYPS0463J Assessee…

Ved Prakash, Haryana vs. ACIT, Bhiwani

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is on this ground is dismissed

ITA 1409/DEL/2017[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2019AY 2001-02

Bench: Sh. H. S. Sidhudr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1409/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2001-02 Ita No. 1410/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2002-03 Ita No. 1411/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2003-04 Ita No. 1412/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 Ita No. 1413/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ved Parkash, Vs Asstt. Commissioner Of Income S/O Sh. Partap Singh, Tax, Sco 202-203, Office Of Paras Wali Gal, Near Bus Stand, Income Tax, Huda City Centre, Charkhi Dadri, Haryana Bhiwani (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Azyps0463J Assessee By : None Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.07.2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 09.07.2019 Order Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A), Rohtak Each Dated 30.12.2016. 2. In Ita No. 1409/Del/2017, The Assessee Has Raised The Following Effective Grounds: “1. That The Ld. Cit(A) In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case Has Erred In Dismissing The Appeal Without Considering That The Assessed Income After Giving Appeal Effect Of Order Of Ld. Cit(A) & Hon'Ble Itat Was Wrongly Determined On 03/03/2011 At Rs.1,58,925/- Instead Of Correct Computation At Rs.66,425/-. Even This Issue Has Not Been Considered Though Raised. 2. That The Ld. Cit(A) In The Facts Of The Case Has Erred In Confirming The Assessment Of Income From School Without

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES ‘G’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. H. S. Sidhu, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member ITA No. 1409/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2001-02 ITA No. 1410/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2002-03 ITA No. 1411/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2003-04 ITA No. 1412/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 ITA No. 1413/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ved Parkash, Vs Asstt. Commissioner of Income S/o Sh. Partap Singh, Tax, SCO 202-203, Office of Paras Wali Gal, Near Bus Stand, Income Tax, HUDA City Centre, Charkhi Dadri, Haryana Bhiwani (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AZYPS0463J Assessee…

DCIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. Florentine Estate Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 752/DEL/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Jun 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishidcit, Florentine Estate Pvt. Ltd, Vs. Central Circle-18, W-82A, Greater Kailash-Ii, New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri J. K. Mishra, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143Section 153ASection 153C

…INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “D”: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DCIT, Florentine Estate Pvt. Ltd, Vs. Central Circle-18, W-82A, Greater Kailash-II, New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Revenue by : Shri J. K. Mishra, CIT DR Assessee by: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Adv Shri Shailesh Gupta, CA Ms. Madhu Aggarwal, Adv Date of Hearing 10/04/2019 Date of pronouncement 26/06/2019 O R D E R PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, A. M. 1. This appeal is filed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle – 27, New Delhi (the ld AO) against…

Surya Agrotech Infrastructure Ltd, New Delhi vs. ACIT, Central Circle-8, New Delhi

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 1158/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 May 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawal, Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawal, G.D. Agrawal, Vice G.D. Agrawal, Vice & And & Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 37Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI DELHI BENCH DELHI DELHI BENCH BENCH ’G’: NEW DELHI BENCH : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGRAWAL, BEFORE SHRI BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGRAWAL, G.D. AGRAWAL, VICE G.D. AGRAWAL, VICE VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT PRESIDENT AND PRESIDENT AND AND AND , JUDICIAL MEMBER MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE , JUDICIAL MEMBER , JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No 1156/Del/2019 ITA ITA No No 1156/…

Surya Agrotech Infrastructure Ltd, New Delhi vs. ACIT, Central Circle-8, New Delhi

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 1157/DEL/2019[201`3-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 May 2019

Bench: Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawal, Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawal, G.D. Agrawal, Vice G.D. Agrawal, Vice & And & Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 37Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI DELHI BENCH DELHI DELHI BENCH BENCH ’G’: NEW DELHI BENCH : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGRAWAL, BEFORE SHRI BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGRAWAL, G.D. AGRAWAL, VICE G.D. AGRAWAL, VICE VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT PRESIDENT AND PRESIDENT AND AND AND , JUDICIAL MEMBER MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE , JUDICIAL MEMBER , JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No 1156/Del/2019 ITA ITA No No 1156/…