New Diwan Oil Mills v. CIT

296 ITR 495High Court2008#218 most cited

What is New Diwan Oil Mills v. CIT authority for?

The High Court can return a reference unanswered if the assessee fails to appear or provide assistance. This illustrates the broader principle that appellate authorities have inherent power to dismiss appeals for non-prosecution when a party does not effectively pursue their case.

351

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

New Diwan Oil Mills v. CIT · 296 ITR 495 · dismissal for non-prosecution · assessee non-appearance · failure to assist court · High Court reference unanswered · Section 250(6) · inherent power to dismiss appeal · effective pursuit of appeal

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing New Diwan Oil Mills v. CIT

Sh. Deepak Jain, New Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

In the result, appeal filed by assessee stands dismissed

ITA 5663/DEL/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Oct 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Sri R.S.Syal & Smt. Beena A Pillaia.Y. 2009-10 Sh. Deepak Jain Vs. Acit, Central Circle 06 624, Modern Apartment New Delhi Sector 15, Rohini New Delhi 110 085 Pan: Afdpj7401E (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: None Respondent By: Sh. S.R.Senapati, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 01.10.2018 Date Of Pronouncement: 01St October, 2018 Order Per Beena A Pillaithe Present Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 14.08.2013 Passed By Ld.Cit(A)-Xxxi, Delhi For Assessment Year 2009-10. 2. During The Course Of Hearing Today I.E. On 01 St October, 2018, Inspite Of Service Of Notice, Nobody Was Present On Behalf Of The Assessee Nor Any Adjournment Request Received. It Therefore, Appears That The Assessee Is Not Interested To Prosecute The Matter. 3. The Law Aids Those Who Are Vigilant, Not Those Who Sleep Upon Their Rights. This Principle Is Embodied In Well Known Dictum, “Vigilantibus Et Non Dormientibus Jura Sub Veniunt’. Considering The Facts & Keeping In View The Provisions Of Rule 19(2) Of The Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules As Were Considered In The Case Of Cit Vs. Multiplan India Ltd., (38 Itd 320)(Del), We Treat This Appeal As Unadmitted.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. S.R.Senapati, Sr. D.R

…hearing, or fails in taking steps for preparation of the paper books so as to enable hearing of the reference, the court is not bound to answer the reference.” 5. Similarly, Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of New Diwan Oil Mills vs. CIT (2008) 296 ITR 495) returned the reference unanswered since the assessee remained absent and there was not any assistance from the assessee. 6. Their Lordships of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. B. Bhattachargee & Another (118 ITR 461 at page 477-478) held that the appeal does not mean, mere filing of the memo of appeal but effectively pursuing the sam…