Sh. Deepak Jain, New Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi
In the result, appeal filed by assessee stands dismissed
ITA 5663/DEL/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Oct 2018AY 2009-10
Bench: Sri R.S.Syal & Smt. Beena A Pillaia.Y. 2009-10 Sh. Deepak Jain Vs. Acit, Central Circle 06 624, Modern Apartment New Delhi Sector 15, Rohini New Delhi 110 085 Pan: Afdpj7401E (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: None Respondent By: Sh. S.R.Senapati, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 01.10.2018 Date Of Pronouncement: 01St October, 2018 Order Per Beena A Pillaithe Present Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 14.08.2013 Passed By Ld.Cit(A)-Xxxi, Delhi For Assessment Year 2009-10. 2. During The Course Of Hearing Today I.E. On 01 St October, 2018, Inspite Of Service Of Notice, Nobody Was Present On Behalf Of The Assessee Nor Any Adjournment Request Received. It Therefore, Appears That The Assessee Is Not Interested To Prosecute The Matter. 3. The Law Aids Those Who Are Vigilant, Not Those Who Sleep Upon Their Rights. This Principle Is Embodied In Well Known Dictum, “Vigilantibus Et Non Dormientibus Jura Sub Veniunt’. Considering The Facts & Keeping In View The Provisions Of Rule 19(2) Of The Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules As Were Considered In The Case Of Cit Vs. Multiplan India Ltd., (38 Itd 320)(Del), We Treat This Appeal As Unadmitted.
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. S.R.Senapati, Sr. D.R
…hearing, or fails in taking steps for preparation of the paper books so as to enable hearing of the reference, the court is not bound to answer the reference.” 5. Similarly, Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of New Diwan Oil Mills vs. CIT (2008) 296 ITR 495) returned the reference unanswered since the assessee remained absent and there was not any assistance from the assessee. 6. Their Lordships of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. B. Bhattachargee & Another (118 ITR 461 at page 477-478) held that the appeal does not mean, mere filing of the memo of appeal but effectively pursuing the sam…