New Delhi Television Ltd. v. DCIT

116 Taxmann.com 151Supreme Court of India2020#734 most cited

What is New Delhi Television Ltd. v. DCIT authority for?

Reassessment initiated under Section 147/148 is invalid if the Assessing Officer relies on material obtained post-recording of reasons, or if it amounts to a mere change of opinion on facts fully and truly disclosed by the assessee during the original assessment. An assessee's obligation extends only to the full and true disclosure of primary facts, not to provide further assistance or inferences.

139

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2012 to 2026.

Also referred to as

New Delhi Television Ltd. v. DCIT · Section 147 · Section 148 · Income Tax Act 1961 · reassessment validity · mere change of opinion · full and true disclosure · primary facts · reasons recorded · material post-recording · Kelvinator principle · first proviso to section 147

Also reported as

424 ITR 607271 Taxmann 1

Sections most often in play

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 1961Section 148Section 142(1)Section 153CSection 132Section 151
Read the full judgment

Issues it is cited on

section 292c(1)(i)section 292c(1)full and true disclosurebeyond four yearstrue and full disclosurefirst proviso to section 147fresh tangible materialmaterial facts necessary for assessmentmere change of opinionkelvinatorsection 35dsection 151(2)

Judgments citing New Delhi Television Ltd. v. DCIT

Sanman Trade Impex Limited, Mumbai vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle-4(4), Mumbai

ITA 3491/MUM/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail ()

Section 10ASection 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 149Section 151Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “G” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) AND SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL (JUDICIAL MEMBER) ITA Nos. 3491, 3474, 3473, 3472 & 3471, 3470/MUM/2023 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2017-18 & 2020-21 to 2021-22 M/s Sanman Trade Impex Ltd. 1410, Maker Chamber V, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. PAN NO. AADCS 2973 A Appellant Vs. Asst. CIT Central Circle-4(4), Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. Respondent ITA Nos. 3606, 3605, 3603, 3602, 3614 & 3610, 3601/MUM/2023 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2018-19 & 2020-21 to 2021-22 DCIT Central Circle-4(…

Sanman Trade Impex Limited, Mumbai vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-Central Circle 4(4), Mumbai

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed dismissed whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 3474/MUM/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail ()

For Appellant: Dr. Kishor Dhule, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Mr. Rakesh Joshi
Section 143(3)Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “G” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) AND SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL (JUDICIAL MEMBER) ITA Nos. 3491, 3474, 3473, 3472 & 3471, 3470/MUM/2023 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2017-18 & 2020-21 to 2021-22 M/s Sanman Trade Impex Ltd. Asst. CIT Central Circle-4(4), 1410, Maker Chamber V, Air India Building, Vs. Nariman Point, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400021. PAN NO. AADCS 2973 A Appellant Respondent ITA Nos. 3606, 3605, 3603, 3602, 3614 & 3610, 3601/MUM/2023 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2018-19 & 2020-21 to 2021-22 DCIT Central Circle…

Sanman Trade Impex Limited, Mumbai vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle-4(4), Mumbai

ITA 3473/MUM/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jul 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail ()

For Appellant: Mr. Rakesh JoshiFor Respondent: Dr. Kishor Dhule, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 149Section 151Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “G” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) AND SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL (JUDICIAL MEMBER) ITA Nos. 3491, 3474, 3473, 3472 & 3471, 3470/MUM/2023 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2017-18 & 2020-21 to 2021-22 M/s Sanman Trade Impex Ltd. 1410, Maker Chamber V, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. PAN NO. AADCS 2973 A Appellant Vs. Asst. CIT Central Circle-4(4), Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. Respondent ITA Nos. 3606, 3605, 3603, 3602, 3614 & 3610, 3601/MUM/2023 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2018-19 & 2020-21 to 2021-22 DCIT Central Circle-4(…

Sanman Trade Impex Limited, Mumbai vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax- Central Circle 4(4), Mumbai

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed dismissed whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 3470/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jul 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail ()

For Appellant: Dr. Kishor Dhule, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Mr. Rakesh Joshi
Section 143(3)Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “G” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) AND SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL (JUDICIAL MEMBER) ITA Nos. 3491, 3474, 3473, 3472 & 3471, 3470/MUM/2023 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2017-18 & 2020-21 to 2021-22 M/s Sanman Trade Impex Ltd. Asst. CIT Central Circle-4(4), 1410, Maker Chamber V, Air India Building, Vs. Nariman Point, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400021. PAN NO. AADCS 2973 A Appellant Respondent ITA Nos. 3606, 3605, 3603, 3602, 3614 & 3610, 3601/MUM/2023 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2018-19 & 2020-21 to 2021-22 DCIT Central Circle…

Hero Motocorp Ltd (As Successor of Hero Investment P.Ltd), New Delhi vs. DCIT, Circle 11(1), New Delhi

The appeal is allowed

ITA 1053/DEL/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Jul 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Anubhav Sharmaassessment Year: 2011-12

Section 143(3)

…does not extend to suggesting inferences of fact and law that can be drawn from such disclosure. Reference was made to decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Calcutta Discount Co. Ltd. v. ITO: 41 ITR 191 (SC). as reiterated in New Delhi Television Ltd. v. DCIT: 424 ITR 607 (SC). Reliance was also placed on ACIT vs. Oracle Financial Services Software Ltd.: [2023] 452 ITR 280 (SC). 25. As regards the argument of ld. DR about failure to not disclose "concessions" being allowed by the appellant to Honda, Ld. Sr. Counsel submitted that the reasons recorded have drawn inference of such alleged concessions being made ava…

Tanvi Sandeep Mathur, Ahmedabad vs. The DCIT, Circle-7(1), Ahmedabad

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 20/AHD/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad15 Jul 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Ms. Suchitra Kambleassessment Year: 2011-12

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 151Section 151(2)Section 54

…ITA No.20/Ahd/2020 Assessment Year: 2011-12 Page 1 of 9 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2011-12 Tanvi Sandeep Mathur, The Deputy Commissioner of C/o. M.S. Chhajed & Co., Income Tax, “Kamal Shanti”, Circle – 7(1), Beside Bank of Baroda, Ahmedabad. Nr. Sardar Patel Under Bridge, Vs. Naranpura, Ahmedabad – 380 014. [PAN – ANFPM 6538 D] (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Hem Chhajed, AR (VH) Revenue by Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 11.07.2024 Date of Prono…

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Exemptions, Circle, Jaipur vs. Global Institute of Technology Society, Jaipur Rajasthan

In the results the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 175/JPR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur27 Jun 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. S. L. Poddar, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Anoop Singh, (Addl.CIT)
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)Section 13(3)Section 143(3)Section 147

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES, “B” JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBkSM deys’k t;arHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 175/JPR/2024 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year : 2013-14 cuke Assistant Commissioner of Global Institute of Technology Vs. Income Tax, Exemptions, Circle, Society, Jaipur Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAATG 3217 H vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. S. L. Poddar, Adv. jktLo…

DCIT, Cir-3(3)(1), Mumbai vs. East West Pipeline Pvt Ltd., Mumbai

Accordingly, without any adjudication upon the merits, Ground No. 5 to 8 to raised by the Revenue are dismissed as being infructuous

ITA 1999/MUM/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Jan 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Madhur AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Biswanath Das
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 147Section 73(1)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "E" BENCH, MUMBAI SHRI B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3(3)(1), Mumbai, Room No. 609, Aaykar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Churchgate, Mumbai - 400020 …………… Appellant East West Pipeline Private Limited, 147, 14th Floor, Atlanta, 222, Vs Nariman Point, S.O. Mumbai - 400021 [PAN:AABCP4405E] ……………. Respondent Appearance For the Appellant/Department : Shri Biswanath Das For the Respondent/Assessee : Shri Madhur Agrawal Date Conclusion of hearing : 10.10.2023 Pronouncement of order : 05.01.2024 O R D E R Per Rah…

Bajaj Auto Ltd., Mumbai vs. DCIT -Ltu -1, Mumbai

In the result we find that in absence of tangible material, the reopening of assessment cannot be made

ITA 3949/MUM/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Nov 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm The Dy. Commissioner Of Bajaj Auto Limited 2N D Floor, Bajaj Bhawan, Income-Tax, Vs. 226, Nariman Point, Large Taxpayer Unit-1 Mumbai-400 021 Mumbai-400 005 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aadcb2923M

For Appellant: Shri Percy Pardiwala, Sr. Adv. &For Respondent: Shri S Srinivasu, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 145(2)Section 147

…efore, it is apparent that assessment for assessment year 2009 – 10 was already concluded when the assessment for assessment year 2010 – 11 was pending. 031. Honourable Supreme Court in New Delhi television Ltd versus Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (2020) 424 ITR 607 has categorically held that subsequent facts which come to the knowledge of the assessing officer can be taken into account to decide whether or not the assessment proceedings should be reopened. Thus, the information which comes to the notice of the assessing officer during the assessment proceedings for subsequent assessment year can definitely…

Nalini Parwani, Raipur vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1), Raipur

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of the aforesaid observations

ITA 249/RPR/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Oct 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 249/Rpr/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Nalini Parwani C/O. G.K Automobiles P. Ltd. Opp. Kabir Nagar, Gate No.2. Ring Road-2, Sondongri, Raipur (C.G.)-492 001 Pan : Aeqpp5635N .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1), Raipur (C.G.)

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh Kumar Chawda, CAFor Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 28Section 57

…transpires that the assessee had disclosed fully and truly all the material facts necessary for framing her assessment. I may herein observe that the Hon’ble Supreme Court, in the case of New Delhi Television Ltd. vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (2020) 116 Taxmann.com 151 (SC), had, inter alia, held that though the assessee is obligated to disclose the “primary facts” but it is neither required to disclose the “secondary facts” nor required to give any assistance to the 15 Nalini Parwani Vs. ITO, Ward-3(1), Raipur A.O by disclosure of the other facts and it is for the A.O to decide what inferences are to b…

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-1), Raipur vs. M/S Sunil Sponge Pvt. Ltd., Raipur

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 73/RPR/2022[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur12 Oct 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.73/Rpr/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2007-08 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Central Circle)-1, Raipur (C.G.) .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. M/S. Sunil Sponge Pvt. Ltd. H. No.11, Jalvihar Colony, Raipur (C.G.)-492 001 (C.G.) Pan : Aahcs7999A ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: S/shri, Sakshi Gopal Agrawal &For Respondent: Shri Choudhary N.C. Roy, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 40A(2)(b)

…nsactions that it had made during the year to its sister concern, viz. M/s Sunil Re-roller and Steels Pvt. Ltd. (supra). We may herein observe that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of New Delhi Television Ltd. vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (2020) 116 Taxmann.com 151 (SC), had, inter alia, held that though the assessee is obligated to disclose the “primary facts” but it is neither required to disclose the “secondary facts” nor required to give any assistance to the A.O by disclosure of the other facts and it is for the A.O to decide what inferences are to be drawn from the facts before him. It was obs…

Maya Devi Agrawal, Raipur vs. Income Tax Officer-1(3), Raipur

In the result, the assessee's appeal is allowed in terms of my observations above

ITA 193/RPR/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur08 Sept 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 193/Rpr/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09 Maya Devi Agrawal Near Dena Bank, Dupan Para Kharora, Raipur (C.G.)-493 225 Pan : Acipa5876A .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer-1(3), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

…Singhania vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income (2004) 269 ITR 192 (P& H). Apart from that, we find that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of New Delhi Television Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income 11 Maya Devi Agrawal Vs. ITO-1(3), Raipur Tax, (2020) 116 Taxmann.com 151 (SC) had, inter alia, held, that though the assessee is obligated to disclose the “primary facts”, but it is neither required to disclose the “secondary facts” nor required to give any assistance to the A.O by disclosure of the other facts, and it is for the A.O to decide what inferences are to be drawn from the facts before him. As in th…

M/S. Seema Holding Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs. A.C.I.T., Circle -1, Guwahati

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 69/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 67/Gty/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Seema Holding Pvt. Ltd. I.T.O. Ward-15(2), Kolkata Vs [Now, Acit, Central Circle-1, 89, Muktaram Babu Street Guwahati] Kolkata - 700007 [Pan : Aadcs5209H] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhary, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Chandan Dutta, D/R
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

…| आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण "यायपीठ, गुवाहाटी| IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “GUWAHATI” BENCH, GUWAHATI BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI SONJOY SARMA, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 67/GTY/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/s. Seema Holding Pvt. Ltd. I.T.O. Ward-15(2), Kolkata Vs [Now, ACIT, Central Circle-1, 89, Muktaram Babu Street Guwahati] Kolkata - 700007 [PAN : AADCS5209H] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) I.T.A. No. 68/GTY/2023 Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/s. Seema Holding Pvt. Ltd. I.T.O. Ward-15(2), Kolkata [Now, ACIT, Central Circle-1, Vs 89, Muktaram Babu Street Gu…

M/S. Seema Holding Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs. A.C.I.T., Circle -1, Guwahati

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 68/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 67/Gty/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Seema Holding Pvt. Ltd. I.T.O. Ward-15(2), Kolkata Vs [Now, Acit, Central Circle-1, 89, Muktaram Babu Street Guwahati] Kolkata - 700007 [Pan : Aadcs5209H] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhary, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Chandan Dutta, D/R
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

…| आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण "यायपीठ, गुवाहाटी| IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “GUWAHATI” BENCH, GUWAHATI BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI SONJOY SARMA, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 67/GTY/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/s. Seema Holding Pvt. Ltd. I.T.O. Ward-15(2), Kolkata Vs [Now, ACIT, Central Circle-1, 89, Muktaram Babu Street Guwahati] Kolkata - 700007 [PAN : AADCS5209H] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) I.T.A. No. 68/GTY/2023 Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/s. Seema Holding Pvt. Ltd. I.T.O. Ward-15(2), Kolkata [Now, ACIT, Central Circle-1, Vs 89, Muktaram Babu Street Gu…

M/S. Seema Holding Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs. A.C.I.T., Circle -1, Guwahati

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 67/GTY/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 67/Gty/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Seema Holding Pvt. Ltd. I.T.O. Ward-15(2), Kolkata Vs [Now, Acit, Central Circle-1, 89, Muktaram Babu Street Guwahati] Kolkata - 700007 [Pan : Aadcs5209H] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhary, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Chandan Dutta, D/R
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

…| आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण "यायपीठ, गुवाहाटी| IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “GUWAHATI” BENCH, GUWAHATI BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI SONJOY SARMA, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 67/GTY/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/s. Seema Holding Pvt. Ltd. I.T.O. Ward-15(2), Kolkata Vs [Now, ACIT, Central Circle-1, 89, Muktaram Babu Street Guwahati] Kolkata - 700007 [PAN : AADCS5209H] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) I.T.A. No. 68/GTY/2023 Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/s. Seema Holding Pvt. Ltd. I.T.O. Ward-15(2), Kolkata [Now, ACIT, Central Circle-1, Vs 89, Muktaram Babu Street Gu…

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-1(1), Raipur vs. Shri Sharad Goel, Raipur

In the result appeal of the revenue stands dismissed, in terms of our observations herein above

ITA 93/RPR/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur07 Jul 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD (Judicial Member), SHRI ARUN KHODPIA (Accountant Member)

For Respondent: Smt. Ila M. Parmar, CIT-DR
Section 250(4)Section 45(3)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, रायपुर न्यायपीठ, रायपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR श्री रविश सूद, न्याधयक सदस्य एिं श्री अरुण खोड़वपया, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष । BEFORE SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JM & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, AM आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.93/RPR/2020 (Assessment Year: 2011-2012) ACIT-1(1), Raipur Vs Shri Sharad Goel, Lodhipara Chowk, Raipur (CG) PAN No. :AGVPG 5894 M (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) .. : Shri Amit M. Jain, Advocate धििााररती की ओर से /Assessee by राजस्ि की ओर से /Revenue by : Smt. Ila M. Parmar, CIT-DR सुििाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 13/04/2023 घोषणा की तारीख/Date…

Jt. CIT (Ods) - CC -1(4), Mumbai vs. Ultratech Cement Ltd., Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 222/MUM/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jun 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon’Bledeputy Commissioner Of Income Tax V. M/S. Ultratech Cement Ltd., Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9Th Floor 2Nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road Pratishtha Bhavan, Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent) Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Osd) V. M/S. Ultratech Cement Ltd. Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9Th Floor 2Nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road Pratishtha Bhavan Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent) & M/S. Ultratech Cement Limited V. Dcit, Central Circle- 1(4) [Acit, Cc] Room. No 902, 9Th Floor Ahura Centre, B-Wing, 2Nd Floor Pratishtha Bhavan Mahakali Caves Road Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 Maharishi Karve Road Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 35D

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “F”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s. Ultratech Cement Ltd., Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9th Floor 2nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road Pratishtha Bhavan, Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 PAN: AAACL6442L (Appellant) (Respondent) Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD) v. M/s. Ultratech Cement Ltd. Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9th Floor 2nd Floo…

Ultra Tech Cement Limited, Mumbai vs. ACIT- CC 1(4), Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 220/MUM/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jun 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon’Bledeputy Commissioner Of Income Tax V. M/S. Ultratech Cement Ltd., Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9Th Floor 2Nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road Pratishtha Bhavan, Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent) Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Osd) V. M/S. Ultratech Cement Ltd. Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9Th Floor 2Nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road Pratishtha Bhavan Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent) & M/S. Ultratech Cement Limited V. Dcit, Central Circle- 1(4) [Acit, Cc] Room. No 902, 9Th Floor Ahura Centre, B-Wing, 2Nd Floor Pratishtha Bhavan Mahakali Caves Road Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 Maharishi Karve Road Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 35D

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “F”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s. Ultratech Cement Ltd., Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9th Floor 2nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road Pratishtha Bhavan, Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 PAN: AAACL6442L (Appellant) (Respondent) Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD) v. M/s. Ultratech Cement Ltd. Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9th Floor 2nd Floo…

DCIT Cir 1(4), Mumbai vs. M/S. Ultratech Cement Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1789/MUM/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jun 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon’Bledeputy Commissioner Of Income Tax V. M/S. Ultratech Cement Ltd., Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9Th Floor 2Nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road Pratishtha Bhavan, Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent) Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Osd) V. M/S. Ultratech Cement Ltd. Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9Th Floor 2Nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road Pratishtha Bhavan Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent) & M/S. Ultratech Cement Limited V. Dcit, Central Circle- 1(4) [Acit, Cc] Room. No 902, 9Th Floor Ahura Centre, B-Wing, 2Nd Floor Pratishtha Bhavan Mahakali Caves Road Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 Maharishi Karve Road Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 35D

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “F”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s. Ultratech Cement Ltd., Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9th Floor 2nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road Pratishtha Bhavan, Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 PAN: AAACL6442L (Appellant) (Respondent) Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD) v. M/s. Ultratech Cement Ltd. Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9th Floor 2nd Floo…

M/S. Ultratech Cement Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT Cent Cir-1(4), Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1466/MUM/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jun 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon’Bledeputy Commissioner Of Income Tax V. M/S. Ultratech Cement Ltd., Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9Th Floor 2Nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road Pratishtha Bhavan, Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent) Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Osd) V. M/S. Ultratech Cement Ltd. Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9Th Floor 2Nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road Pratishtha Bhavan Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent) & M/S. Ultratech Cement Limited V. Dcit, Central Circle- 1(4) [Acit, Cc] Room. No 902, 9Th Floor Ahura Centre, B-Wing, 2Nd Floor Pratishtha Bhavan Mahakali Caves Road Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 Maharishi Karve Road Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 35D

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “F”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s. Ultratech Cement Ltd., Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9th Floor 2nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road Pratishtha Bhavan, Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 PAN: AAACL6442L (Appellant) (Respondent) Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD) v. M/s. Ultratech Cement Ltd. Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9th Floor 2nd Floo…